Bernhard Diensberg
Studia Etymologica Cracoviensia, Volume 20, Issue 1, 2015, pp. 71-88
https://doi.org/10.4467/20843836SE.15.005.2791Bernhard Diensberg
Studia Etymologica Cracoviensia, Volume 17, Issue 1, 2012, pp. 7-24
https://doi.org/10.4467/20843836SE.12.001.0391English lexemes containing intrusive nasal consonants mostly have a difficult origin in common. In what follows (part I), the relevant word material will be ordered according to its phonological structure. In principle we follow the ordering of Gustav Muthmann’s Reverse English Dictionary. Based on Phonological and Morphological Principles of 2002. In cases such as jig v. and its frequentative jiggle v., paralleled by most probably related and nearly synonymous jog v. and its frequentative joggle v., the attested forms are not only rare but also late. Therefore, we have been constrained to base some etymologies on roots, mostly of imitative origin. In part II, some French loan verbs, which show unusual retention of Old French -er/-re in Middle English, will be examined.
Bernhard Diensberg
Studia Etymologica Cracoviensia, Volume 20, Issue 1, 2015, pp. 63-69
https://doi.org/10.4467/20843836SE.15.004.2790Regarding the word form aroint, I am going to propose an etymological base for it in the group of French loanwords of the structure oin + consonant. As far as verbal loans are concerned, the root -oint can either stand for the 3rd pers. sing. pres. ind. or for the past participle of Old French verbs of the type poindre ‘to pierce, prick; to sting, bite’ (AND1: poindre), uindre, oindre ‘to anoint; to rub, smear’ (AND1: oindre). Apart from a short bibliography, the Appendix contains a selection of illustrative material.