FAQ

Positional faithfulness and nasal assimilation in English

Data publikacji: 29.11.2023

Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis, 2023, Volume 140, Issue 4, s. 267 - 285

https://doi.org/10.4467/20834624SL.23.014.18636

Autorzy

Paweł Rydzewski
Uniwersytet Warszawski, ul. Krakowskie Przedmieście 30, 00-927 Warszawa, Polska
Wszystkie publikacje autora →

Tytuły

Positional faithfulness and nasal assimilation in English

Abstrakt

This article analyzes the process of Nasal Assimilation in English.1 The approach to Nasal Assimilation in a standard rule-based framework can be conducted in two ways: by assuming an underlying alveolar nasal or by employing underspecification. The article contributes to the ongoing debate regarding underspecification in phonology and focuses on employing underspecified representations in Optimality Theory. First, it is argued that in such words as, for instance, somber, Nasal Assimilation is best analyzed in terms of positional faithfulness in the form of prevocalic faithfulness. Second, as the analyses show, positional faithfulness does not provide a workable scenario for all the data, and it is necessary to use underspecification to satisfactorily analyze English words which lack the context for positional faithfulness, for example, swamp. Nevertheless, subsequent evaluations demonstrate that in certain phrases, for instance, sing boys, employing underspecification is not sufficient either, and level distinction is necessary. Therefore, the article also offers an argument in favour of levels in Optimality Theory.

* This paper develops the analysis originally conducted in Rubach (2019) by extending the empirical coverage.

Bibliografia

Baković E. 2000. Harmony, dominance and control. [PhD dissertation, Rutgers University].

Beckman J.N. 1997. Positional faithfulness, positional neutralization and Shona vowel harmony. – Phonology 20.1: 1–46.

Bermúdez-Otero R. 2001. Voicing and continuancy in Catalan: A non-vacuous Duke-of-York gambit and a richness of the base paradox. [MS thesis, University of Manchester].

Booij G. E., Rubach J. 1987. Postcyclic versus postlexical rules in Lexical Phonology. – Linguistic Inquiry 19.1: 1–44.

Casali R. 1997. Vowel elision in hiatus contexts: Which vowel goes? – Language 73.3: 493–533.

Chomsky N., Halle M. 1968. The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.

Halle M. 1992. Phonological features. – Bright W. (ed.). International encyclopedia of linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 218–227.

Kiparsky, P. 1982. From cyclic to Lexical Phonology. – van der Hulst H., Norval S. (eds.). The structure of phonological representations. [vol. 1]. Dordrecht: Foris Publications: 191–185.

Kiparsky P. 1985. Some consequences of Lexical Phonology. – Phonology Yearbook 2: 85–198.

Kiparsky P. 1997. LP and OT. [Handout, Cornell Linguistic Institute].

Kiparsky P. 2000. Opacity and cyclicity. – The Linguistic Review 17.2/4: 351–365.

Kuźmicki M. 2019. Stem level and word level in Lexical Phonology and Optimality Theory: English and Nahuatl nasal assimilation and Polish palatalization. [PhD dissertation, University of Warsaw].

Lombardi L. 1999. Positional faithfulness and voicing assimilation in Optimality Theory. – Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 17: 267–302.

McCarthy J.J., Prince A. 1995. Faithfulness and reduplicative identity. – Beckman J.N., Dickey L.W., Urbanczyk S. (eds.). University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 19. Amherst (MA): Graduate Linguistic Student Association Publications: 259–384.

Pater J. 1999. Austronesian nasal substitution and other NC effects. – Kager R., van der Hulst H., Zonneveld W. (eds.). The prosody-morphology interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 310–343.

Prince A., Smolensky P. 2004. Optimality Theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Oxford: Blackwell. [Revision of 1993 technical report, Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Sciences. Available on Rutgers Optimality Archive, ROA-537].

Rubach J. 1984. Cyclic and lexical phonology. The structure of Polish. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.

Rubach J., Booij G. 1990. Syllable structure assignment in Polish. – Phonology 7.1: 121–158.

Rubach J. 2000a. Glide and glottal stop insertion in Slavic languages: A DOT analysis. – Linguistic Inquiry 31.2: 271–317.

Rubach J. 2000b. Backness switch in Russian. – Phonology 17.1: 39–64.

Rubach J. 2003a. Duke-of-York derivations in Polish. – Linguistic Inquiry 34.4: 601–629.

Rubach J. 2003b. Polish palatalization in Derivational Optimality Theory. – Lingua 113.3: 197–237.

Rubach J. 2008a. Prevocalic faithfulness. – Phonology 26.3: 433–468.

Rubach J. 2008b. Palatal nasal decomposition in Slovene, Upper Sorbian and Polish. – Journal of Linguistics 44.1: 169–204.

Rubach J. 2011. Syllabic repairs in Macedonian. – Lingua 121.2: 237–268.

Rubach J. 2014. Soft labial conspiracy in Kurpian. – Journal of Linguistics 50.1: 185–230.

Rubach J. 2017. Polish yers: Representation and analysis. – Journal of Linguistics 52.2: 422–466.

Rubach J. 2019. Three arguments for underspecified representations. – Studies in Polish Linguistics 14.4: 191–217.

Sagey E. 1986. The representation of features and relations in non-linear phonology. [PhD dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology].

Trubetzkoy N.S. 1939. Grundzuge der Phonologie. Travaux du circle linguistique de Prague 7. Prague: Cercle Linguistique de Prague. [English translation: Principles of phonology. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1969.]

Vaysman O. 2002. Against richness of the base: Evidence from Nganasan. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 28.1: 327–338.

Informacje

Informacje: Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis, 2023, Volume 140, Issue 4, s. 267 - 285

Typ artykułu: Oryginalny artykuł naukowy

Tytuły:

Polski:

Positional faithfulness and nasal assimilation in English

Angielski:

Positional faithfulness and nasal assimilation in English

Autorzy

Uniwersytet Warszawski, ul. Krakowskie Przedmieście 30, 00-927 Warszawa, Polska

Publikacja: 29.11.2023

Status artykułu: Otwarte __T_UNLOCK

Licencja: CC BY  ikona licencji

Udział procentowy autorów:

Paweł Rydzewski (Autor) - 100%

Korekty artykułu:

-

Języki publikacji:

Angielski

Liczba wyświetleń: 339

Liczba pobrań: 328

<p> Positional faithfulness and nasal assimilation in English</p>