Network models: an assessment
cytuj
pobierz pliki
RIS BIB ENDNOTEWybierz format
RIS BIB ENDNOTENetwork models: an assessment
Data publikacji: 20.12.2010
Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis, 2010, Volume 127, Issue 1, s. 39 - 56
Autorzy
Network models: an assessment
This article – based on a larger study (Pawelec 2009) – has two aims. The more limited one is to present network models proposed by Ronald Langacker and George Lakoff. I try to show that both ventures rest on manifestly different assumptions, contrary to the widespread view that they are convergent or complementary. Langacker’s declared aim is “descriptive adequacy”: his model serves as a global representation of linguistic intuitions, rooted in convention. Lakoff, on the other hand, offers a developmental model: a fairly general abstract schema is “imagistically” specified and transformed, while the more specific schemas serve as the basis for metaphorical transfers. My wider aim is to offer a preliminary assessment of theoretical justifications and practical potential of network models in lexical semantics.
Croft W., Cruse D.A. 2004. Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge.
Dunbar G. 1991. The cognitive lexicon. Tübingen.
Evens M.W. (ed.) 1988. Relational models of the lexicon. Representing knowledge in semantic networks. Cambridge.
Johnson M. 1987. The body in the mind. Chicago.
Katz J. 1971. The underlying reality of language. New York.
Kleiber G. 2003. Semantyka prototypu. Kategorie i znaczenie leksykalne. [1990: La semantique du prototype. Categories et sens lexical. Paris]. Kraków.
Lakoff G. 1987. Women, fire, and dangerous things. What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago, London.
Lakoff G. 1990. The Invariance Hypothesis: is abstract reason based on image-schemas? – Cognitive Linguistics 1.1: 39–74.
Lakoff G. 1996 Moral politics. Chicago.
Lakoff G., Johnson M. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago.
Lakoff G., Johnson M. 1999. Philosophy in the flesh. New York.
Lakoff G., Núñez R. 2001. Where mathematics comes from. New York.
Lakoff G., Turner M. 1989 More than cool reason. Chicago.
Langacker R. 1987 Foundations of cognitive grammar. [vol. I Theoretical prerequisites]. Stanford, ca
Langacker R. 1988. A usage-based model. – Rudzka-Ostyn B. (ed.) Topics in cognitive linguistics. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: 127–161.
Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk B. 2007. Polysemy, prototypes, and radial categories. – Geeraerts D., Cuyckens H. (eds.) The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics. Oxford, New York: 139–169.
Łozowski P. 1999. Panchrony, or linguistics without synchrony. – Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk B. (ed.) Cognitive perspectives on language. Frankfurt am Main: 23–35.
Normand C. 2004. System, arbitrariness, value. – Sanders C. (ed.) The Cambridge companion to Saussure. Cambridge: 88–104.
Oakley T. 2007. Image schemas. – Geeraerts D., Cuyckens H. (eds.) The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics. Oxford, New York: 214–235.
Pawelec A. 2005. Znaczenie ucieleśnione. Propozycje kręgu Lakoffa. Kraków.
Pawelec A. 2009. Prepositional network models. A hermeneutical case study. Kraków.
Rúa, P.L. 2003. Birds, colours and prepositions. The theory of categorization and its applications in linguistics. München.
Saussure F. de 1959. Course in general linguistics. New York.
Tabakowska, E. 1995. Gramatyka i obrazowanie. Kraków.
Talmy L. 1995. The cognitive culture system. Duisburg.
Taylor J. 1989. Linguistic categorization. Prototypes in linguistic theory. Oxford.
Tuggy D. 2007. Schematicity. – Geeraerts D., Cuyckens H. (eds.) The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics. Oxford, New York: 82–116.
Tyler A., Evans V. 2003. Reconsidering prepositional polysemy networks: The case of over. – Nerlich B. et al. (eds.) Flexible patterns of meaning in mind and language. Berlin, New York: 95–159.
Zlatev J. 2003. Polysemy or generality? Mu. – Cuyckens H. et al. (eds.) Cognitive approaches to lexical semantics. Berlin: 447–494.
Brückner A. 1927. Słownik etymologiczny języka polskiego. Kraków.
Longman Dictionary = 2003. Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English. Harlow.
Informacje: Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis, 2010, Volume 127, Issue 1, s. 39 - 56
Typ artykułu: Oryginalny artykuł naukowy
Tytuły:
Network models: an assessment
Network models: an assessment
Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie, Polska, ul. Gołębia 24, 31-007 Kraków
Publikacja: 20.12.2010
Status artykułu: Otwarte
Licencja: Żadna
Udział procentowy autorów:
Korekty artykułu:
-Języki publikacji:
AngielskiLiczba wyświetleń: 2327
Liczba pobrań: 1387