Aromanian – Language or Dialect? Overview of Historical and Contemporary Opinions
cytuj
pobierz pliki
RIS BIB ENDNOTEWybierz format
RIS BIB ENDNOTEAromanian – Language or Dialect? Overview of Historical and Contemporary Opinions
Data publikacji: 05.08.2021
Romanica Cracoviensia, Tom 21 (2021), Tom 21, Numer 2, s. 105 - 114
https://doi.org/10.4467/20843917RC.21.011.14066Autorzy
Aromanian – Language or Dialect? Overview of Historical and Contemporary Opinions
This article aims at presenting two concepts from the modern typology of the Romance languages, with a special focus on the Aromanian ethnolect. The first concept, which is widely accepted in the Romanian linguistics and was most prevalent before the Second World War, does not recognise Aromanian as a separate language, but treats it as one of four dialects of the Romanian language. The second movement, much closer to modern Romanist research at the international level, opts for a full autonomy of all Balkan Romance ethnolects and attributes to them statuses of national languages. It also negates the existence of a common Romanian language in the first millennium, arguing that the Balkan Romance languages developed independently from a late form of Balkan Latin around the 11th century.
*Translation of the paper founded by the “Proofreading and translations at POB Heritage” programme.
Informacje: Romanica Cracoviensia, Tom 21 (2021), Tom 21, Numer 2, s. 105 - 114
Typ artykułu: Oryginalny artykuł naukowy
Tytuły:
Aromanian – Language or Dialect? Overview of Historical and Contemporary Opinions
Aromanian – Language or Dialect? Overview of Historical and Contemporary Opinions
Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie, Polska, ul. Gołębia 24, 31-007 Kraków
Publikacja: 05.08.2021
Status artykułu: Otwarte
Licencja: CC BY-NC-ND
Udział procentowy autorów:
Korekty artykułu:
-Języki publikacji:
AngielskiLiczba wyświetleń: 1174
Liczba pobrań: 2088