FAQ

Rocznik Kognitywistyczny

Neuropoznawcze modele przestępczości i ich zastosowanie w psychologii sądowej na przykładzie diagnostyki dewiacyjnych preferencji seksualnych

Data publikacji: 29.06.2012

Rocznik Kognitywistyczny, 2011, Tom 5, s. 83 - 91

https://doi.org/10.4467/20843895RK.12.010.0414

Autorzy

,
Krzysztof Kasparek
Wszystkie publikacje autora →
Paweł Banaś D.
Wszystkie publikacje autora →

Abstrakt

Neurocognitive Models of Crime and their Application in Forensic Psychology Based on Deviant Sexual Preferences Diagnosis

This article applies to applications of cognitive neuroscience in forensic psychology and sexology. Many studies show that anti-social people demonstrate deficits in the central area of ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VMPF) and related to it executive functions (FZ). These people have difficulties with learning, discounting of rewards and use the rules. The somatic markers theory explains this in terms of disorders in the formation of association between stimulus and reward or punishment (function VMPF). Tests involving VMPF should therefore differentiate between control groups and those manifesting anti-social behavior. The theory is confirmed by numerous studies measuring the efficiency of the FZ in the population of sex offenders. Deficits in the FZ are used in the diagnosis of deviant sexual preferences

Bibliografia

Abel G.G., Huffmann J., Warberg B., Holland C.L. (1998). Visual Reaction Time and Plethysmography as Measures of Sexual Interest in Child Molesters. „Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment” 10, s. 81–95.

Banse R., Schmidt A.F., Clarbour J. (2010). Indirect Measures of Sexual Interest in Child Sex Offenders: A Multimethod Approach. „Criminal Justice and Behavior” 37(3), s. 319–335.

Beech A.R., Kalmus E., Tipper S.P., Baudouin J.-Y., Flak V., Humphreys G.W. (2008). Children Induce an Enhanced Attentional Blink in Child Molesters. „Psychological Assessment” 20(4), s. 397–402.

Blackburn R. (1996). What Is Forensic Psychology? „Legal and Criminological Psychology” 1, s. 3–16.

Blanchard R. (2009). Paraphilia Scales from Kurt Freund’s Erotic Preferences Examination Scheme, www.hu-berlin.de (dostęp: 31.01.2011).

Damasio A.R., Tranel D., Damasio H. (1990). Individuals with Sociopathic Behavior Caused by Frontal Damage Fail to Respond Autonomically to Social Stimuli. „Behavioural Brain Research” 41, s. 81–94.

Damasio A.R., Tranel D., Damasio H. (1991). Somatic Markers and the Guidance of Behavior: Theory and Preliminary Testing, [w:] H.S. Levin, H.M. Eisenberg, A.L. Benton (red.), Frontal Lobe Function and Dysfunction. New York: Oxford University Press.

Damasio H., Grabowski T., Frank R., Galaburda A.M., Damasio A.R. (1994). The Return of Phineas Gage: Clues about the Brain from the Skull of a Famous Patient. „Science” 264, s. 1102–1105.

Gierowski J.K., Jaśkiewicz-Obydzińska T., Najda M. (2008). Psychologia w postępowaniu karnym. Warszawa: LexisNexis.

Gray N.S., Brown A.S., MacCulloch M.J., Smith J., Snowden R.J. (2005). An Implicit Test of the ssociations between Children and Sex in Pedophiles. „Journal of Abnormal Psychology” 114(2), s. 304–308.

Gress C.L.Z. (2005). Viewing Time Measures and Sexual Interest: Another Piece of the Puzzle.„Journal of Sexual Aggression” 11, s. 117–125.

Hanson R.K., Morton-Bourgon K. (2004). Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Canada. Predictors of Sexual Recidivism: An Updated Meta-Analysis. Public Works and Government Services Canada.

Imhoff R., Schmidt A.F., Nordsiek U., Luzar C., Young A.W., Banse R. (2010). Viewing Time Effects Revisited: Prolonged Response Latencies for Sexually Attractive Targets under Restricted Task Conditions. „Archives of Sexual Behavior” 39(6), s. 1275–1288.

Kalmus E., Beech A. (2005). Forensic Assessment of Sexual Interest: A Review. „Aggression and Violent Behavior” 10(2), s. 193–217.

Laakso M., Vaurio O., Koivisto E., Savolainen L., Eronen M., Aronen H.J., Hakola P., Repo E., Soininen H., Tiihonen J. (2001). Psychopathy and the Posterior Hippocampus. „Behavioural Brain Research” 118, s. 187–193.

Letourneau E.J. (2002). A Comparison of Objective Measures of Sexual Arousal and Interest: Visual Reaction Time and Penile Plethysmography. „Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment” 14(3), s. 207–223.

Mokros A., Dombert B., Osterheider M., Zappalà A., Santtila P. (2010). Assessment of Pedophilic Sexual Interest with an Attentional Choice Reaction Time Task. „Archives of Sexual Behavior” 39(5), s. 1081–1090.

Moore C.S., Oaksford M. (2002). Emotional Cognition, [w:] C.S. Moore, M. Oaksford (red.), Emotional Cognition: From Brain to Behaviour. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Nęcka E., Orzechowski J., Szymura B. (2006). Psychologia poznawcza. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Academica.

Nelson E.S. (2010). Intro to the ABEL Assessment of Sexual Interest, www.psylaw.com/uploads/ABEL_Assessment_for_VSOTA.pdf (dostęp: 15.05.2012).

Norman D.A., Shallice T. (1988). Attention to Action: Willed and Automatic Control of Behaviour, [w:] M.S. Gazzaniga (red.), Cognitive Neuroscience: A Reader. Oxford: Blackwell.

Price S., Hanson R.K. (2007). A Modified Stroop Task with Sexual Offenders: Replication of a Study. „Journal of Sexual Aggression” 13(3), s. 203–216.

Raine A., Lencz T., Bihrle S., LaCasse L., Colletti P. (2000). Reduced Prefrontal Gray Matter

Volume and Reduced Autonomic Activity in Antisocial Personality Disorder. „Archives of General Psychiatry” 57, s. 119–127.

Rolls E. (2002). The Functions of the Orbitofrontal Cortex, [w:] D.T. Struss, R.T. Knight (red.), Principles of Frontal Lobe Function. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Rosenzweig S. (1942). The Photoscope as an Objective Device for Evaluating Sexual Interest. „Psychosomatic Medicine” 4, s. 150–157.

Santtila P., Mokros A., Viljanen K., Koivisto M., Sandnabba N.K., Zappalà A. (2009). Assessment of Sexual Interest Using a Choice Reaction Time Task and Priming: A Feasibility Study. „Legal and Criminological Psychology” 14(1), s. 65–82.

Singer B. (1984). Conceptualizing Sexual Arousal and Attraction. „Journal of Sex Research” 20, s. 230–240.

Smith P., Waterman M. (2004). Processing Bias for Sexual Material: The Emotional Stroop and Sexual Off enders. „Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment” 16(2), s. 163–171.

Spinella M., White J., Frank M., Schiraldi J. (2006). Evidence of Orbitofrontal Dysfunction in Sex Offenders. „International Journal of Forensic Psychology” 3, s. 62–68.

Tranel D. (2002). The Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex, [w:] D.T. Struss, R.T. Knight (red.), Principles of Frontal Lobe Function. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ward T., Beech T. (2006). An Integrated Theory of Sexual Offending. „Aggression and Violent Behavior” 11, s. 44–63.

Weber S., Habel U., Amunts K., Schneider F. (2008). Structural Brain Abnormalities in Psychopaths – A Review. „Behavioral Sciences and the Law” 26, s. 7–28.

Wright L.W., Adams H.E. (1994). Assessment of Sexual Preference Using a Choice Reaction Time Task. „Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment” 16, s. 221–231.

Informacje

Informacje: Rocznik Kognitywistyczny, 2011, s. 83 - 91

Typ artykułu: Oryginalny artykuł naukowy

Tytuły:

Angielski:

Neuropoznawcze modele przestępczości i ich zastosowanie w psychologii sądowej na przykładzie diagnostyki dewiacyjnych preferencji seksualnych

Publikacja: 29.06.2012

Status artykułu: Otwarte __T_UNLOCK

Licencja: Żadna

Udział procentowy autorów:

Krzysztof Kasparek (Autor) - 50%
Paweł Banaś D. (Autor) - 50%

Korekty artykułu:

-

Języki publikacji:

Polski

Liczba wyświetleń: 2373

Liczba pobrań: 1118