Power in Deaf Pedagogy and Curriculum Design: Multimodality in the Digital Environments of Deaf Education (DE2)
cytuj
pobierz pliki
RIS BIB ENDNOTEWybierz format
RIS BIB ENDNOTEPower in Deaf Pedagogy and Curriculum Design: Multimodality in the Digital Environments of Deaf Education (DE2)
Data publikacji: 2022
Przegląd Kulturoznawczy, 2022, Numer 3 (53) Technology between empowerment and exclusion, s. 345 - 381
https://doi.org/10.4467/20843860PK.22.025.16614Autorzy
Power in Deaf Pedagogy and Curriculum Design: Multimodality in the Digital Environments of Deaf Education (DE2)
Deaf people are a heterogeneous global minority singularly linked by technology. I posit that deaf people wield the cutting-edge of innovation by developing or repurposing digital technologies in deaf education as a means to leverage the affordances of visuospatial sign languages and multimodal communication. Throughout, I investigate a nexus of historical, cultural, social, political, and ideological struggle where deaf people use their own power and self-determination to counteract harmful forces like oppression and exclusion. To do this, I synthesize the digital environments of deaf education (DE2) and articulate a theory of deaf educational power centered on the interdependence of digital knowledge modes and the deaf users driving their development. I situate modes as a fundamental unit of analysis. Multimodality is related to power and ethics in education and assists in critically analyzing DE2. Multimodal theory illustrates how power is used in DE2 and shows ecological relationships between pedagogical ethics and knowledge co-construction by deaf students and educators. In sum; deaf people use multimodal technologies to construct deaf-centric educational power. Three major findings are categorized: (1) the purposes for which DE2 are designed, (2) the practices constitutive of DE2, and (3) disciplines represented in DE2 research. Two exemplars from category 3 are shown and analyzed. Both interrelate Deaf Culture, sign language, and digital education technologies. One is situated in a deaf student protest about language and communication access. The second is rooted in the multilingual characteristics of an international consortium related to deaf science epistemologies. Overall, I elucidate a social history of technology in deaf education to show that DE2 is a globalized phenomenon transcending geopolitical boundaries.
Albertini J.A., Kelly R.R., Matchett M.K., Personal Factors That Influence Deaf College Students’ Academic Success, “Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education”2012, vol. 17 (1), pp. 85–101. DOI: 10.1093/deafed/enr016.
Bahn B., Senses and Culture: Exploring Sensory Orientations [in:] H.-D. Bauman, J.J. Murray (eds.), Deaf Gain: Raising the Stakes for Human Diversity, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis 2014, pp. 233–254.
Bartels M., Learn to Say Astronomy, Constellation, Solar Eclipse, and More in Sign Languages, “Newsweek”2017, https://www.newsweek.com/learn-say-astronomy-constellation-solar-eclipse-and-more-sign-languages-743043.
Bauman H.-D., Murray J.J., Deaf Gain: An Introduction [in:] H.-D. Bauman, J.J. Murray (eds.), Deaf Gain: Raising the Stakes for Human Diversity, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis 2014, pp. xv–xlii.
Bauman H.-D., Murray J.J., Deaf Studies in the 21st Century: “Deaf Gain” and the Future of Human Diversity [in:] L. Davis (ed.), The Disability Studies Reader (4th ed.), Routledge, New York 2013, pp. 246–262.
Beal-Alvarez J., Cannon J.E., Technology Intervention Research with Deaf and Hard of Hearing Learners: Levels of Evidence, “American Annals of the Deaf”2014, vol. 158 (5), pp. 486–505.
Becvar L.A., Hollan J., Hutchins E., Hands as Molecules: Representational Gestured Used for Developing Theory in a Scientific Laboratory, “Semiotica”2005, vol. 156 (1/4), pp. 89–112.
Behm G., Kushalnagar R., Stanislow J., Kelstone A.W., Enhancing Accessibility of Engineering Lectures for Deaf and Hard of Hearing (DHH): Real-time Tracking Text Displays (RTTD) in Classrooms, American Society for Engineering Education, Seattle 2015.
Boote D.N., Beile P., Scholars Before Researchers: On the Centrality of the Dissertation Literature Review in Research Preparation, “Educational Researcher”2005, vol. 34 (6), pp. 3–15. DOI: 10.3102/0013189X034006003.
Burgstahler S., Opening Doors or Slamming Them Shut? Online Learning Practices and Students with Disabilities, “Social Inclusion”2015, vol. 3 (6), pp. 69–79. DOI: 10.17645/si.v3i6.420.
Burgstaler S., Cory R.C., Universal Design in Higher Education: From Principles to Practice, Harvard Education Press, Cambridge 2009.
Burke T.B., Armchairs and Stares: On the Privation of Deafness [in:] H.-D. Bauman, J.J. Murray (eds.), Deaf Gain: Raising the Stakes for Human Diversity, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis 2014, pp. 3–22.
Cannon J.E., Fredrick L.D., Easterbrooks S.R., Vocabulary Instruction Through Books Read in American Sign Language for English-language Learners with Hearing Loss, “Communication Disorders Quarterly” 2010, vol. 31 (2), pp. 98–112. DOI: 10.1177/1525740109332832.
Cawthon S.W., Garberoglio C.L., Research in Deaf Education, Oxford University Press, New York 2017.
Clemens J., Nash A., Being and Media: Digital Ontology after the Event of the End of the Media, “The Fiberculture Journal” 2015, vol. 24, pp. 6–32.
Curry M.J., Media Literacy for English Language Learners: A Semiotic Approach, “Literacy and Numeracy Studies” 1999, vol. 9 (2), pp. 29–46.
Davis L., The End of Identity Politics: On Disability as an Unstable Category [in:] L. Davis (ed.), The Disability Studies Reader (4th ed.), Routledge, New York 2013, pp. 263–277.
Domingo R., Minakawa A., Li Q., Panel. An Autoethnography Method on the Study of Power Dynamics on Language Ideologies in the Context of Deaf Communities in The Philippines, Japan, and China, 10th Annual Deaf Academics and Researchers Conference: Strengthening Deaf Academics and Researchers Agora, Montreal 2021.
Dowaliby F., Lang H., Adjunct Aids in Instructional Prose: A Multimedia Study with Deaf College Students, “Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education” 1999, vol. 4 (4), pp. 270–282. DOI: 10.1093/deafed/4.4.270.
Dye M.W.G., Hauser P.C., Bavelier D., Visual Skills and Cross-Modal Plasticity in Deaf Readers, “Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences” 2008, vol. 1145, pp. 71–82. DOI: 10.1196/annals.1416.013.
Eagleman D., Can We Create New Senses for Humans?, TED Talks, 2015, http://www.ted.com/talks/david_eagleman_can_we_create_new_senses_for_humans?language=en.
Easterbrooks S.R., Stephenson B., An Examination of Twenty Literacy, Science, and Mathematics Practices Used to Educate Students Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing, “American Annals of the Deaf” 2006, vol. 151 (4), pp. 385–396. DOI: 10.1353/aad.2006.0043.
Easterbrooks S.R., Stoner M., Using a Visual Tool to Increase Adjectives in the Written Language of Students Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing, “Communication Disorders Quarterly” 2006, vol. 27 (2), pp. 95–109.
Fleischer L., Critical Pedagogy and ASL Videobooks [in:] H.-D. Bauman (ed.), Open Your Eyes: Deaf Studies Talking, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis 2008, pp. 158–166.
Furth H.G., Research with the Deaf: Implications for Language and Cognition, “Psychological Bulletin”1964, vol. 62 (3), pp. 145–164. DOI: 10.1037/h0046080.
Gillard P., Astbrink G., Baily J., Mobile Communication in Real Time for the First Time: User Evaluation of Non-voice Terminal Equipment for People with Hearing and Speech Disabilities [in:] T. Sobh et al. (eds.), Innovative Algorithms and Techniques in Automation, Industrial Electronics, and Telecommunications, Springer, Dordrecht 2007, pp. 347–352.
Glickman N.S., Hall W.C., Language Deprivation and Deaf Mental Health, Routledge, New York 2019.
Hamraie A., Building Access: Universal Design and the Politics of Disability, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis 2017.
Hamraie A., Fritsch K., Crip Technoscience Manifesto, “Catalyst; Feminism, Theory, Technoscience” 2019, vol. 5 (1), pp. 1–34.
Harris R., Seizing Academic Power: Creating Deaf Counternarratives (film produced by S.C. Loeffler, published by ASLized, 2015), https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C3Ae20lXJ1I.
Harris R., Seizing Academic Power: Creating Deaf Counternarratives. Transcript (produced by S.C. Loeffler, published by ASLized, 2015), http://aslized.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/AcademicPowerTranscript.pdf.
Hauser P. et al., Deaf Epistemology: Deafhood and Deafness, “American Annals of the Deaf” 2010, vol. 154 (5), pp. 486–496. DOI: 10.1353/aad.0.0120.
Hernandez F.A. et al., Education in the Age of Extreme Digital Exploration, Discovery, and Innovation [in:] M.A. Peters, T. Besley, D. Araya (eds.), The New Development Paradigm: Education, Knowledge Economy, and Digital Futures, Peter Lang, New York 2014, pp. 94–114.
Hodge R., Kress G., Social Semiotics, Cornell University Press, Ithaca 1988.
Hopper M.J., Positioned as Bystanders: Deaf Students’ Experiences and Perceptions of Informal Learning Phenomena (doctoral dissertation), University of Rochester, Rochester 2011.
Humphries T. et al., Language Acquisition for Deaf Children: Reducing the Harms of Zero Tolerance to the Use of Alternative Approaches, “Harm Reduction Journal” 2012, vol. 9 (16), pp. 3–9. DOI: 10.1186/1477-7517-9-16.
Hunter L., The Embodied Classroom: Deaf Gain in Multimodal Composition and Digital Studies, “Journal of Interactive Technology and Pedagogy” 2015, vol. 8, pp. 1–19.
Ito M. et al., Hanging Out, Messing Around, Geeking Out: Living and Learning with New Media, MIT Press, Cambridge 2010.
Jewitt C., An Introduction to Multimodality [in:] C. Jewitt (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis, Routledge, New York 2009, pp. 14–27.
Katz S., The Covid Zoom Boom is Reshaping Sign Language, “Scientific American”2021, https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-covid-zoom-boom-is-reshaping-sign-language1/.
Keating M., Mirus G., American Sign Language in Virtual Space: Interactions between Deaf Users of Computer-Mediated Video Communication and the Impact of Technology on Language Practices, “Language in Society” 2003, vol. 32 (5), pp. 693–714. DOI: 10.1017/S0047404503325047.
Knoors H., Hermens D., Effective Instruction for Deaf and Hard-of-hearing Students: Teaching Strategies, School Settings, and Student Characteristics [in:] M. Marschark, P.E. Spencer (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Deaf Studies, Language, and Education, Oxford University Press, New York 2010.
Knoors H., Marschark M., Language Planning for the 21st Century: Revisiting Bilingual Language Policy for Deaf Children, “Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education”2012, vol. 17 (3), pp. 291–305. DOI: 10.1093/deafed/ens018.
Knoors H., Brons M., Marschark M., Deaf Education beyond the Western World, Oxford University Press, New York 2019.
Knoors H., Marschark M. (eds.), Teaching Deaf Learners: Creating a Global Evidence Base, Oxford University Press, New York 2015.
Kourbetis V., Boukouras K., Gelastopoulou M., Multimodal Accessibility for Deaf Students Using Interactive Video, Digital Repository and Hybrid Books [in:] M. Antona, C. Stephanidis (eds.), Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction: Users and Context Diversity, Springer International Publishing, Cham 2016, pp. 93–102.
Kourbetis V., Gelastopoulou M., Using ICT to Develop Universally Designed Educational Materials for Students with Disabilities, ICICTE 2017 Proceedings, pp. 12–21.
Kourbetis V., Karipi S., How Can You Talk about Bilingual Education of the Deaf If You Do Not Teach Sign Language as a First Language? [in:] C. Enns, J. Henner, L. McQuarrie (eds.), Discussing Bilingualism in Deaf Children: Essays in Honor of Robert Hoffmeister, Routledge, New York 2021, pp. 113–131.
Kress G., Discourse Analysis and Education: A Multimodal Social Semiotic Approach [in:] R. Rogers (ed.), Critical Discourse Analysis in Education (2nd ed.), Routledge, New York 2011.
Kress G., Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication, Routledge, New York 2010.
Kress G., Multimodality: Challenges to Thinking about Language, “TESOL Quarterly” 2000, vol. 34, pp. 337–340. DOI: 10.2307/3587959.
Kress G., What is Mode? [in:] C. Jewitt (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis, Routledge, New York 2009, pp. 54–67.
Kress G., Jewitt C., Ogborn J., Tsatsarelis C., Shapes of Knowledge [in:] G. Kress, C. Jewitt, J. Ogborn, C. Tsatsarelis, Multimodal Teaching and Learning: The Rhetorics of the Science Classroom, Continuum, New York 2001, pp. 99–127.
Kropp M., McCartin E., Using Blogs and Tech Tools to Teach Writing to Deaf and Hard of Hearing Students [in:] J. Nickerson (ed.), Teaching for Success: Literacy, Diversity, and Technology, PEPNet-South, Knoxville 2008, pp. 97–104.
Kuntze M., Golos D., Revisiting Rethinking Literacy [in:] C. Enns, J. Henner, L. McQuarrie (eds.), Discussing Bilingualism in Deaf Children: Essays in Honor of Robert Hoffmeister, Routledge, New York 2021, pp. 99–112.
Kuntze M., Golos D., Enns C., Rethinking Literacy: Broadening Opportunities for Visual Learners, “Sign Language Studies” 2014, vol. 14 (2), pp. 203–234.
Kusters A., International Sign as a Conference Language, 10th Annual Deaf Academics and Researchers Conference: Strengthening Deaf Academics and Researchers Agora, Montreal 2021.
Kusters A., Green M., Moriarty E., Snoddon K., Sign Language Ideologies: Practices and Politics [in:] A. Kusters, M. Green, E. Moriarty, K. Snoddon (eds.), Sign Language Ideologies in Practice, De Gruyter Mouton, Boston–Berlin 2020, pp. 3–22.
Kusters A., Spotti M., Swanwick P., Tapio E., Beyond Languages, Beyond Modalities: Transforming the Study of Semiotic Repertoires, “International Journal of Multilingualism” 2017, vol. 14 (3), pp. 219–232. DOI: 10.1080/14790718.2017.1321651.
Lang H., Higher Education for Deaf Students: Research Priorities in the New Millennium, “Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education” 2002, vol. 7 (4), pp. 267–280. DOI: 10.1093/deafed/7.4.267.
Lang H., Steely D., Web-based Science Instruction for Deaf Students: What Research Says to the Teacher, “Instructional Science” 2003, vol. 31 (6), pp. 277–298. DOI: 10.1023/A:1024681909409.
Lee V.R., Adaptations and Continuities in the Use and Design of Visual Representations in US Middle School Science Textbooks, “International Journal of Science Education” 2010, vol. 32, pp. 1099–1126. DOI: 10.1080/09500690903253916.
Luft P., Bonello M., Zirzow N.K., Technology Skills Assessment for Deaf and Hard of Hearing Students in Secondary School, “American Annals of the Deaf” 2009, vol. 4, pp. 389–399. DOI: 10.1353/aad.0.0106.
Maiorana-Basas M., Pagliaro C.M., Technology Use Among Adults Who Are Deaf and Hard of Hearing: A National Study, “Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education” 2014, vol. 19 (3), pp. 400–209. DOI: 10.1093/deafed/enu005.
Malzkuhn M., Herzig M., Bilingual Storybook App Designed for Deaf Children Based on Research Principles, “International Journal of Advanced Computer Science” 2013, vol. 3 (12), pp. 631–635. DOI: 10.1145/2485760.2485849.
Marti E., Tables as Cognitive Tools in Primary Education [in:] C. Andersen, N. Scheuver, M.P. Perez Echeverria, E.V. Teubal (eds.), Representational Systems and Practices as Learning Tools, Sense Publishers, Rotterdam 2009, pp. 133–148.
Maxwell J.A., Literature Reviews of and for Educational Research: A Response To Boote & Beile, “Educational Researcher” 2006, vol. 35 (9), pp. 28–31. DOI: 10.3102/0013189X035009028.
Muir L.J., Richardson I.E.G., Perception of Sign Language and Its Application to Visual Communication for Deaf People, “Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education” 2005, vol. 10 (4), pp. 390–401. DOI: 10.1093/deafed/eni037.
Murray J.J., Haualand H., Teaching Transnationally: International Signs and Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration in an Online Course on Transnational Deaf Lives, 10th Annual Deaf Academics and Researchers Conference: Strengthening Deaf Academics and Researchers Agora, Montreal 2021.
Napoli D.J., A Magic Touch: Deaf Gain and the Benefits of Tactile Sensation [in:] H.-D. Bauman, J.J. Murray (eds.), Deaf Gain: Raising the Stakes for Human Diversity, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis 2014, pp. 211–232.
National Deaf Center, Poll: Pandemic Hits Deaf Students Harder, e-mail released research brief, May 5, 2020, http://eepurl.com/g3hy3T.
National Deaf Center, Universal Design, 2019, https://www.nationaldeafcenter.org/resource/universal-design.
Nowicki R., “Insights into the Autonomy of Video Relay Interpreters.” Book Review of Alley, E. (2019), “Professional Autonomy in Video Relay Service Interpreting.” Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press, “American Annals of the Deaf” 2020, vol. 165 (1), pp. 128–131.
Nuccetelli G., de Monte M.T., Deaf People Education: Crossing Linguistic Borders through E-learning [in:] P. Monachesi, A.M. Gliozzo, E. Westerhout (eds.), Proceedings of the First Workshop on Supporting E-learning with Language Resources and Semantic Data, Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, Valletta 2010, pp. 24–28.
Panera J., Computers and the Writing Process: [Deaf] Students’ Comfort Level with Computer Assisted Writing – Shortcomings of the Grammar Checker [in:] J. Nickerson (ed.), Teaching for Success: Literacy, Diversity, and Technology, PEPNet-South, Knoxville 2008, pp. 109–114.
Pappas C.C. et al., Book Writing and Illustrating: Ways with Text and Pictures [in:] M. Varelas, C.C. Pappas, Children’s Ways with Science and Literacy: Integrated Multimodal Enactments in Urban Elementary Classrooms, Routledge, New York 2012.
Parasnis I., Samar V.J., Fischer S.D., Deaf College Students’ Attitudes Toward Racial/Ethnic Diversity, Campus Climate, and Role Models, “American Annals of the Deaf” 2005, vol. 150 (1), pp. 47–58. DOI: 10.1353/aad.2005.0022.
Parton B.S., Sign Language Recognition and Translation: A Multidisciplined Approach from the Field of Artificial Intelligence, “Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education” 2006, vol. 11 (1), pp. 94–101. DOI: 10.1093/deafed/enj003.
Peters M., Besley T., Araya D. (eds.), The New Development Paradigm: Education, Knowledge Economy, and Digital Futures, Peter Lang, New York 2014.
Pizzuto E. et al., Language Resources and Visual Communications in a Deaf-centered Multimodal E-learning Environment: Issues to Be Addressed [in:] P. Monachesi, A.M. Gliozzo, E. Westerhout (eds.), Proceedings of the First Workshop on Supporting E-learning with Language Resources and Semantic Data, Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, Valletta 2010, pp. 18–23.
Power D., Power M.R., Communication and Culture: Signing Deaf People Online in Europe, “Technology and Disability” 2009, vol. 21 (4), pp. 127–134. DOI: 10.1375/audi.32.1.31.
Power D., Power M.R., Everyone Here Speaks TXT: Deaf People Using SMS in Australia and the Rest of the World, “Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education” 2004, vol. 9 (3), pp. 333–343. DOI: 10.1093/deafed/enh042.
Quinn G., Cameron A., Signs to Unlock Scientific Concepts Deaf Academic Conference, 10th Annual Deaf Academics and Researchers Conference: Strengthening Deaf Academics and Researchers Agora, Montreal 2021.
Raike A., Searching Knowledge CinemaSense as a Case Study in Collaborative Production of a WWW Service in Two Universities [in:] K. Misenberger, J. Claus. W. Zagler, A.I. Karshmer (eds.), Computers Helping People with Special Needs: 11th International Conference, ICCHP, Linz 2008, pp. 568–574.
Raike A., Hakkarainen K., Concept Maps in the Design of an Accessible CinemaSense Service, “Art, Design, & Communication in Higher Education” 2009, vol. 8 (1), pp. 27–55. DOI: 10.1386/adch.8.1.27_1.
Raike A., Keune A., Lindholm B., Muttilainen J., Concept Design for a Collaborative Digital Learning Tool for Film Post-Production, “Journal of Media Practice 2013”, vol. 14 (4), pp. 307–329. DOI: 10.1386/jmpr.14.4.307_1.
Raike A., Pylvänen S., RainòP., Co-Design from Divergent Thinking [in:] H.-D. Bauman, J.J. Murray (eds.), Deaf Gain: Raising the Stakes for Human Diversity, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis 2014, pp. 402–420.
Raike A., Saad-Sulonen J., Scheible J., Visual Tools for Accessible Computer Supported Collaboration [in:] K. Misenberger, J. Claus. W. Zagler, A.I. Karshmer (eds.), Computers Helping People with Special Needs: 11th International Conference, ICCHP, Linz 2008, pp. 142–149.
Reagan T., Ideological Barriers to American Sign Language: Unpacking Linguistic Resistance, “Sign Language Studies” 2011, vol. 11 (4), pp. 606–636.
Roth W.-M., Gestures: Their Role in Teaching and Learning, “Review of Educational Research”2001, vol. 71 (3), pp. 365–392. DOI: 10.3102/00346543071003365.
Ryan R.M., Deci E.L., Self-Regulation and the Problem of Human Autonomy: Does Psychology Need Choice, Self-Determination, and Will?, “Journal of Personality” 2006, vol. 74, no. 6, pp. 1557–1585.
Ryoo K., Linn M.C., Can Dynamic Visualizations Improve Middle School Students’ Understanding of Energy in Photosynthesis?, “Journal of Research in Science Teaching” 2012, vol. 49, pp. 218–243. DOI: 10.1002/tea.21003.
Saldaña J., The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers, Sage Publications, London 2012.
Seessel J., Listening to Silenced Voices: Teaching Writing to Deaf Students and What It Can Teach Us about Composition Studies, “Teaching English in the Two-Year College” 2013, vol. 40 (4), pp. 399–415.
Shah D., Software Allows Deaf to Speak over Mobile, 2008, https://www.newlaunches.com/archives/software_allows_deaf_to_speak_over_mobile.php.
Shepherd C.M., Alpert M., Using Technology to Provide Differentiated Instruction for Deaf Learners, “Journal of Instructional Pedagogies” 2015, vol. 16, pp. 1–7. DOI: 10.1109/GHTC.2013.6713653.
Sherriff L., Nokia Launches Mobile Phone for the Deaf: Portable Talk-Type System Developed with the Help of RNID, 1999, https://www.theregister.com/1999/09/02/nokia_launches_mobile_phone/.
Skyer M.E., Invited Article: The Bright Triad and Five Propositions: Toward a Vygotskian Framework for Deaf Pedagogy and Research, “American Annals of the Deaf” 2020, vol. 164 (5), pp. 577–591.
Skyer M.E., Pupil ⇄ Pedagogue: Grounded Theories about Biosocial Interactions and Axiology for Deaf Educators (doctoral dissertation), University of Rochester 2021.
Skyer M.E., Writing Critical Deaf Pedagogy [in:] P.J. Graham, N. Neild (eds.), Strategies for Promoting Independence and Literacy for Deaf Learners with Disabilities, IGI Global 2022 (in preparation).
Skyer M.E., Cochell L., Aesthetics, Culture, Power: Critical Deaf Pedagogy and ASL Video-Publications as Resistance-to-Audism in Deaf Education and Research, “Critical Education” 2020, vol. 11 (15), pp. 1–26.
Straetz K. et al., An E-learning Environment for Deaf Adults, 2005, https://www.academia.edu/50539079/An_E_learning_environment_for_deaf_adults?auto=download&email_work_card=download-paper.
Sutherland A., Padden T., Videoconferencing for Deaf People: A Case Study of On-line Education for Deaf People, “Deafness and Education International” 2006, vol. 1 (2), pp. 114–120. DOI: 10.1179/146431599790561352.
Swanwick R., Goodchild S., Adami E., Problematizing Translanguaging as an Inclusive Pedagogical Strategy in Deaf Education, “International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism” 2022, pp. 1–18. DOI: 10.1080/13670050.2022.2078650.
Swanwick R., Marschark M., Enhancing Education for Deaf Children: Research into Practice and Back Again, “Deafness and Education International” 2010, vol. 12 (4), pp. 217–235. DOI: 10.1179/1557069X10Y.0000000002.
Thoutenhoofd E.D., Acting with Attainment Technologies in Deaf Education: Reinventing Monitoring as an Intervention Collaboratory, “Sign Language Studies” 2010, vol. 10 (2), pp. 214–230.
Unsworth L., Cleirigh C., Multimodality and Reading: The Construction of Meaning through Image–Text Interaction [in:] C. Jewitt (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis, Routledge, New York 2009, pp. 151–163.
Valente J.M., Cyborgization: Deaf Education for Young Children in the Cochlear Implantation Era, “Qualitative Inquiry” 2011, vol. 17 (7), pp. 639–652.
Valentine G., Skelton T., ‘An Umbilical Cord to the Word:’ The Role of the Internet in D/Deaf People’s Information and Communication Practices, “Information, Communication & Society” 2009, vol. 12 (1), pp. 44–65. DOI: 10.1080/13691180802158573.
Van Haitsma P., New Pedagogical Engagements with Archives: Student Inquiry and Composing in Digital Spaces, “College English”2015, vol. 78 (1), pp. 34–55.
Virdi J., Hearing Happiness: Deaf Cures in History, University of Chicago Press, Chicago 2019.
Weber J., Skyer M.E., “The Aesthetics of OER, Deaf Pedagogy, and Curriculum Design Contra the ‘Wicked Policy Problems’ of Deaf Education, “Revista Iberoamericana de Educaión a Distancia” 2022, vol. 25 (2), pp. 2–21.
Wehmeyer M.L., Self-Determination and Individuals with Severe Disabilities: Re-Examining Meanings and Misinterpretations, “Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities” 2005, vol. 30 (3), pp. 113–120, https://doi.org/10.2511/rpsd.30.3.113.
Wells G., Modes of Meaning in a Science Activity, “Linguistics and Education” 2000, vol. 10, pp. 307–334. DOI: 10.1016/S0898-5898(99)00011-X.
Wood K.M., Blackboard in College Writing Classrooms with Deaf Students [in:] J. Nickerson (ed.), Teaching for Success: Literacy, Diversity, and Technology, PEPNet-South, Knoxville 2008, pp. 115–117.
Young A., Temple B., Approaches to Social Research: The Case of Deaf Studies, Oxford University Press, New York 2014.
Informacje: Przegląd Kulturoznawczy, 2022, Numer 3 (53) Technology between empowerment and exclusion, s. 345 - 381
Typ artykułu: Oryginalny artykuł naukowy
Tytuły:
Power in Deaf Pedagogy and Curriculum Design: Multimodality in the Digital Environments of Deaf Education (DE2)
Power in Deaf Pedagogy and Curriculum Design: Multimodality in the Digital Environments of Deaf Education (DE2)
University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Stany Zjednoczone
Publikacja: 2022
Status artykułu: Otwarte
Licencja: CC BY
Udział procentowy autorów:
Korekty artykułu:
-Języki publikacji:
AngielskiLiczba wyświetleń: 1523
Liczba pobrań: 671