FAQ

The significance of freehand drawing in the teaching process in general construction
project classes

Data publikacji: 22.01.2016

Czasopismo Techniczne, 2015, Architektura Zeszyt 4-A (4) 2015, s. 203 - 211

https://doi.org/10.4467/2353737XCT.15.302.4705

Autorzy

Małgorzata Mełges
Institute of Building Design, Faculty of Architecture, Cracow University of Technology
Wszystkie publikacje autora →

Tytuły

The significance of freehand drawing in the teaching process in general construction
project classes

Abstrakt

As you know, the first requirement faced by the candidate wishing to study at the Faculty of Architecture is freehand drawing; passing the examination in it is the basis for admission. Freehand drawing in both the teaching process, and then in the professional activity is an expression of artistic and spatial sensitivity of every student and architect. It also has a high priority in the design process, especially at the stage of an idea, concept and architectural creation. Before there appeared the possibility of using the computer, concepts and student projects had been performed manually during the teaching of all design subjects. It was a rule to prepare designs in pencil techniques, in ink, and other tools and techniques ‒ e.g. watercolor, tempera, feather, etc. The creative process required understanding and analysis of the developed vision or architectural issue in the context of brain ‒ eye ‒ hand relations. In the era of universal computerization these relations and correlations have been weakened, which, as can be seen in practice, does not always produce good ‒ expected ‒ results in the teaching process. First of all, probably, due to the deterioration of the function of imagination (including aesthetic one) among entrants and the strengthening of their tendency to laziness (including taking “shortcuts”), which in a sense is ‒ for artistic professions ‒ even murderous. Therefore, observing messages of creativity among students of architecture, one can state that the computer can, of course, be an aid, but it cannot be the main tool in mental, emotional and creative development process.

Bibliografia

[1] Białkiewicz A., Rola rysunku w warsztacie architekta. Szkoła krakowska w kontekście dokonań wybranych uczelni europejskich i polskich, Monograph 315, Politechnika Krakowska, Kraków 2004.

[2] Gill R., Zasady rysunku realistycznego, Książka dla projektantów ilustratorów i artystów, Galaktyka, Spółka z o.o., Łódź 1997.

[3] Knothe J., Z żabiej perspektywy, Nasza Księgarnia, Warszawa 1977.

[4] Orzechowski M., Rysunek, zmysł architektury, Wydawnictwo Blue Bird, Warszawa 2014.

[5] Jose M. Parramon i Muntsa Calbo, Perspektywa w rysunku i w malarstwie, Wydawnictwa Szkolne i Pedagogiczne, Warszawa 1993.

[6] Wojciechowski L., Dokumentacja budowlana 1, Rysunek budowlany, Wydawnictwo Szkolne i Pedagogiczne, Warszawa 1985.

[7] Wolszczan A., Nowoczesna komunikacja ‒ NAUKAEKSTRA, Biblioteka Gazety Wyborczej 20, Agora 2012.

[8] Żychowska M.J., Confrontation with the future, Architecture Confrontation With The Past, monograph edited by: E. Trocka-Leszczyńska, E. Przesmycka, Politechnika Wrocławska, Wrocław 2014. Ill. 5. Professor Akio Hizume’s sketches, explaining the principle of statics of historic buildings in seismic areas in Japan

Informacje

Informacje: Czasopismo Techniczne, 2015, Architektura Zeszyt 4-A (4) 2015, s. 203 - 211

Typ artykułu: Oryginalny artykuł naukowy

Tytuły:

Polski:

The significance of freehand drawing in the teaching process in general construction
project classes

Angielski:

The significance of freehand drawing in the teaching process in general construction
project classes

Autorzy

Institute of Building Design, Faculty of Architecture, Cracow University of Technology

Publikacja: 22.01.2016

Status artykułu: Otwarte __T_UNLOCK

Licencja: CC BY  ikona licencji

Udział procentowy autorów:

Małgorzata Mełges (Autor) - 100%

Korekty artykułu:

-

Języki publikacji:

Angielski