Mirosława Podhajecka
Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis, Volume 140, Issue 3, 2023, s. 215-235
https://doi.org/10.4467/20834624SL.23.011.18272Erazm Rykaczewski’s Dokładny słownik polsko-angielski… (1851) was the first Polish- English dictionary. As well as English equivalents for Polish headwords, it offered a rich selection of Polish illustrative examples paired with their English counterparts to provide the user with information on the way the headwords are used in context. While making a bilingual dictionary requires fluency in both languages, Rykaczewski’s knowledge of English was somewhat less than perfect. In the light of the above, how he compiled the volume’s English side remains largely unresolved. This paper empirically tests the hypothesis that he drew on the works of other lexicographers. The research methodology was twofold. Firstly, Fleming and Tibbins’s Royal dictionary (1844-1845) was examined to ascertain whether it formed a part of Rykaczewski’s background material and, if so, to what extent. Secondly, English examples of usage unrecorded in the Royal dictionary were verified against Google Books, a gigantic corpus of texts, to identify potential sources.
Mirosława Podhajecka
Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis, Volume 141, Issue 3, 2024, s. 185-204
https://doi.org/10.4467/20834624SL.24.011.19923Mirosława Podhajecka
Prace Historyczne, Numer 145 (2), 2018, s. 271-301
https://doi.org/10.4467/20844069PH.18.014.7816Lecturers of English in Vilnius and Cracow between the wars: Biographical attempts
Mirosława Podhajecka
Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis, Volume 132, Issue 4, 2015, s. 239-261
https://doi.org/10.4467/20834624SL.15.022.4429The present paper is a contribution to the history of Polish-English and English-Polish lexicography. It aims to throw some light on two bilingual dictionaries compiled by Ludwik Krzyżanowski, which have so far been shrouded in mystery. Fonds no. 49 deposited in the New York archives of the Polish Institute of Arts and Sciences of America (PIASA) provide archives in New York provide valuable data on the author and his scholarly activity, as well as a tiny part of a dictionary typescript that allows for a preliminary assessment of the lexicographic endeavour.
Mirosława Podhajecka
Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis, Volume 131, Issue 1, 2014, s. 67-90
https://doi.org/10.4467/20834624SL.14.004.1376This paper aims to provide a survey of the early polyglot dictionaries which paired Polish with English, based on the premise that the polyglots can be considered as predecessors of bilingual dictionaries proper. Following this rationale, the authoress examines chronologically the first three of the multilingual endeavours: Ambrogio Calepino’s Dictionarium undecim linguarum … (1590), Hieronymus Megiser’s Thesaurus polyglottus: vel, dictionarium multilingue … (1603), and Georg Henisch’s Teütsche Sprach und Weissheit. Thesaurus linguae and sapientiae Germanicae … (1616). The focus is primarily on the linguistic material of the polyglots, but the assumed aims and readership are also tackled briefly. As bilingual wordbooks have traditionally catered to the needs of users of one or both of the respective languages, the polyglot dictionaries are additionally looked at from the perspective of Polish-English language contact in the sixteenth, seventeenth, and eighteenth centuries.
Mirosława Podhajecka
Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis, Volume 131, Issue 2, 2014, s. 193-212
https://doi.org/10.4467/20834624SL.14.010.2018