FAQ

Public Health and Governance

Search results

simple search

search np. “cognitive architectures” AND 1993-200 NOT Urban
advanced search
ex. 1234-6789
ex. 10.4467/16890027AP.16.022.6009
ex. Uniwersytet Jagielloński

Zasady przeprowadzania strategii wyszukiwania na potrzeby raportów HTA

Publication date: 2019

Public Health and Governance, 2019, Volume 17, Issue 4, pp. 230 - 240

https://doi.org/10.4467/20842627OZ.19.024.12186

Authors

,
Konrad Pirek
Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Tariff System, Warsaw, Poland
All publications →
,
Tomasz Garbaty
Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Tariff System, Warsaw, Poland
All publications →
Marta Owczarek
Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Tariff System, Warsaw, Poland
All publications →

Pobierz pełny tekst

Download PDF PDF
Print print Cite cite Share share

Titles

Zasady przeprowadzania strategii wyszukiwania na potrzeby raportów HTA

Abstract

Literature search strategy for Health Technology Assessment Reports   

Preparation of HTA reports requires access to the latest and most reliable knowledge in the field of health care. Systematic reviews are the basic tools used to obtain it. In order to find the literature necessary for a systematic review, search strategies are performed in databases. With their help it is possible to thoroughly and reliably search the resources of individual databases and find the required information. Properly executed search strategies also reduce the risk of missing valuable publications. During the preparation of the search strategy, one should use the tools and additional functions implemented in individual databases, thanks to which it is possible to strictly control the process and adapt it to your own needs. Performing a search strategy is a basic skill for anyone who prepares HTA reports.
 
* Przygotowanie do wydania elektronicznego finansowane w ramach umowy 637/P-DUN/2019 ze środków Ministra Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę.

Keywords

References

1. Pubmed Help, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK3827/#pubmedhelp (dostęp: 1.07.2019).
 
2. Embase Learn and Support, https://www.elsevier.com/solutions/embase-biomedical-research/learn-and-support (dostęp: 1.07.2019).
 
3. Cochrane Polska, https://poland.cochrane.org/pl/jak-interpretowa%C4%87-przegl%C4%85dy-systematyczne (dostęp: 1.07.2019).
 
4. Murad M.H., Montori V.M., Ioannidis J.P. et al., How to read a systematic review and meta-analysis and apply the results to patient care: users’ guides to the medical literature, „JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association ” 2014; 312 (2): 171–179.
 
5. Wytyczne AOTMiT 2016, http://www.aotm.gov.pl/www/wp-content/uploads/wytyczne_hta/2016/20160913_Wytyczne_AOTMiT.pdf (dostęp: 11.06.2019).
 
6. Charles Sturt University 1, https://libguides.csu.edu.au/c.php?g=476545&p=3997202 (dostęp: 12.07.2019).
 
7. Charles Sturt University 2, https://libguides.csu.edu.au/c.php?g=476545&p=4949988 (dostęp: 4.06.2019).
 
8. Charles Sturt University 3, https://libguides.csu.edu.au/c.php?g=476545&p=4833434 (dostęp: 1.07.2019).
 
9. Charles Sturt University 4, https://libguides.csu.edu.au/c.php?g=476545&p=3826737 (dostęp: 22.07.20190).
 
10. Pittway (2008), Systematic literature reviews, w: Thorpe R., Holt R., The SAGE Dictionary of Qualitative Management Research, SAGE Publications Ltd., London 2008, doi:10.4135/9780857020109.
 
11. Liberati A., Altman D.G., Tetzlaff J. et al., The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and metaanalyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration, „Annals of Internal Medicine” 2009; 151: W65–W94.
 
12. Moher D., Liberati A., Tetzlaff J. et al., Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement, „Annals of Internal Medicine” 2009; 151: 264–269.
 
13. EUnetHTA Guidelines: Process of information retrieval for systematic reviews and health technology assessments on clinical effectiveness, July 2015.
 
14. Skala AMSTAR, https://amstar.ca/Amstar-2.php (dostęp: 21.07.2019).
 
15. University of Michigan Library, https://guides.lib.umich.edu/sysreviews (dostęp: 12.07.2019).
 
16. Sampson M., McGowan J., Cogo E. et al., An evidence-based prectice guideline for the peer review od lectronic search strategies, „Journal of Clinical Epidemiology” 2009; 62: 944–952.
 
17. Ovid Guide, http://site.ovid.com/site/help/documentation/osp/en/Content/syntax.htm#truncation (dostęp: 1.07.2019).
 
18. Cochrane Search Help, https://www.cochranelibrary.com/advanced-search/search-manager (dostęp: 1.07.2019).
 
19. Neyt M., Chalon P.X., Search MEDLINE for Economic Evaluations: Tips to Translate an OVID Strategy into a PubMed One, „PharmacoEconomics” 2013; 31: 1087–1090.

Information

Information: Public Health and Governance, 2019, Volume 17, Issue 4, pp. 230 - 240

Article type: Original article

Titles:

Polish:

Zasady przeprowadzania strategii wyszukiwania na potrzeby raportów HTA

English:

Literature search strategy for Health Technology Assessment Reports   

Authors

Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Tariff System, Warsaw, Poland

Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Tariff System, Warsaw, Poland

Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Tariff System, Warsaw, Poland

Published at: 2019

Article status: Open

Licence: CC BY-NC-ND licence icon

Percentage share of authors:

Konrad Pirek (Author) - 33%
Tomasz Garbaty (Author) - 33%
Marta Owczarek (Author) - 34%

Article corrections:

-

Publication languages:

Polish

View count: 1079

Number of downloads: 2321

<p> Literature search strategy for Health Technology Assessment Reports   </p>
Download PDF Download xml