Reflexivity in Modern Hebrew and Polish – contrastive remarks
cytuj
pobierz pliki
RIS BIB ENDNOTEChoose format
RIS BIB ENDNOTEReflexivity in Modern Hebrew and Polish – contrastive remarks
Publication date: 11.09.2012
Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis, 2012, Volume 129, Issue 3, pp. 163 - 188
https://doi.org/10.4467/20834624SL.12.011.0600Authors
Reflexivity in Modern Hebrew and Polish – contrastive remarks
Naturally reflexive actions are expressed by intransitive reflexive stems in Hebrew and by transitive verbs with the reflexive pronoun się in Polish. 2. Actions that are not naturally reflexive are expressed by transitive stems with the reflexive pronoun ’acmo in Hebrew, and by transitive verbs with the reflexive pronoun siebie in Polish. 3. Adverbials with anaphors referring to a subject contain personal pronouns in Hebrew, the reflexive pronoun siebie in Polish, if the reflexive reference of the pronoun is not abnormal. Otherwise the reflexive pronoun ’acmo and the emphatic pronoun samego siebie are used. 4. If a pronoun referring to the subject is a predicate, then in Hebrew it always has the form of an ordinary personal pronoun, while in Polish both the personal and the reflexive pronoun is possible, depending on the copula.
Badawi E.M., Carter M.G., Gully A. 2004. Modern written Arabic. A comprehensive grammar. London.
Doron E. 2003. Agency and voice: The semantics of the Semitic templates. – Natural Language Semantics 11: 1–67 [online http://pluto.huji.ac.il/~edit/edit/].
Doron E. 2008. Trumato šel habinyan lemašma’ut hapo’al [The contribution of the template to verb meaning]. – Hatav G. (ed.) Modern linguistics of Hebrew. Jerusalem [online http://pluto.huji.ac.il/~edit/edit /].
Doron E., Rappaport Hovav M. 2007. Towards a uniform theory of valence-changing operations. – Proceedings of IATL 23 [online http://pluto.huji.ac.il/~edit/edit/]: 57–88.
Doron E., Rappaport Hovav M. 2009. A unified approach to reflexivization in Semitic and Romance. – Brill’s Annual of Afroasiatic Languages and Linguistics 1: 75–105.
Glinert L. 2004. The grammar of modern Hebrew. Cambridge.
Goldenberg G. 1998. “Oneself”, “one’s own” and “one another” in Amharic. – Studies in Semitic linguistics. Selected writings by Gideon Goldenberg. Jerusalem: 384–402.
Halevy R. 2007. The subject co-referential l-pronoun in Hebrew. – Studies in Semitic and general linguistics in honor of Gideon Goldenberg. Münster: 299–321 [online http://huji. academia.edu/rivkahalevy/Papers].
Karolak S. 1984. Składnia wyrażeń predykatywnych. – Topolińska Z. (ed.) Gramatyka współczesnego języka polskiego. Składnia. Warszawa: 11–211.
Madelska L., Warchoł-Schlottmann M. 2008. Odkrywamy język polski. Gramatyka dla uczących (się) języka polskiego jako obcego. Kraków.
Mandelblit N. 2000. The grammatical marking of conceptual integration: From syntax to morphology. – Cognitive Linguistics 11–3.4: 197–251.
Polański K. (ed.) 1999. Encyklopedia językoznawstwa ogólnego. Wrocław.
Reinhart T., Siloni T. 2005. The lexicon-syntax parameter: Reflexivization and other arity operations. – Linguistic Inquiry 36.3: 389–436 [online: www.let.uu.nl/~tanya.reinhart/ personal].
Saloni Z. 1976. Cechy składniowe polskiego czasownika. Wrocław.
Szlifersztejnowa S. 1968. Bierne czasowniki zaimkowe (reflexiva) w języku polskim. Wrocław.
Wilczewska K. 1966. Czasowniki zwrotne we współczesnej polszczyźnie. Toruń. Zribi-Hertz A. 2008. From intensive to reflexive: The prosodic factor. – König E., Gast V. (eds
Information: Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis, 2012, Volume 129, Issue 3, pp. 163 - 188
Article type: Original article
Titles:
Reflexivity in Modern Hebrew and Polish – contrastive remarks
Reflexivity in Modern Hebrew and Polish – contrastive remarks
Jagiellonian University in Kraków, Gołębia 24, 31-007 Kraków, Poland
Published at: 11.09.2012
Article status: Open
Licence: None
Percentage share of authors:
Article corrections:
-Publication languages:
EnglishView count: 2091
Number of downloads: 1630