FAQ
logo of Jagiellonian University in Krakow

An Experimental Comparison of Popular Estimation Methods for the Weibull, Gamma and Gompertz Distributions

Publication date: 23.01.2012

Schedae Informaticae, 2011, Volume 20, pp. 67 - 82

https://doi.org/10.4467/20838476SI.11.003.0289

Authors

Iwona Żerda
All publications →

Titles

An Experimental Comparison of Popular Estimation Methods for the Weibull, Gamma and Gompertz Distributions

Abstract

The aim of this study was to describe some parametric estimation methods for the Weibull, gamma and Gompertz distributions and to identify among them estimators the most efficient in practical applications. Techniques which are considered as traditional methods, like the maximum likelihood (MLE) and the method of moments (MM) estimation but also some newer and less commonly used techniques like the Lmoment estimator (LME), least-square estimator (LSE), generalized spacing estimator (GSE) and percentile estimator (PE) were presented. The application of each method was demonstrated in a simulation study using data sets generated for different distribution parameters and sample sizes. Discussed estimators were compared in terms of their efficiency and bias measured by mean-square errors (MSE) based on the simulations results.

References

Aldrich J.; R.A. Fisher and the Making of Maximum Likelihood 1912-1922, Statistical Science, 12, 1997, pp. 162–176.

Anatolyev S., Kosenok G.; An Alternative to Maximum Likelihood Based on Spacings, Econometric Theory, 21, 2005, pp. 472–476.

Benard A., Bos-Levenbach E.C.; Het uitzetten van waarnemingen op waarschijnlijkdeidspapier (The Plotting of Observations on Probability Paper), Statististica Neerlandica, 7, 1953, pp. 163–173.

Cheng R.C.H., Amin N.A.K.; Estimating Parameters in Continuous Univariate Distributions with a Shifted Origin, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, 45, 1983, pp. 394–403.

Cramer H.; Mathematical Methods of Statistics, Princeton University Press, 1946.

d’Agostino R.B., Stephens M.A.; Goodness-of-fit techniques, Marcel Dekker INC, 1986.

Ekstrom M.; On the consistency of the maximum spacing method, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 70, 1998, pp. 209–224.

Ekstrom M.; Consistency of Generalized Maximum Spacing Estimates, Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 28, 2001, pp. 343–354.

Ghosh K., Jammalamadaka S.R.; A general estimation method using spacings, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 93, 2001, pp. 71–82.

Hosking J.R.M.; L-Moments: Analysis and Estimation of Distributions Using Linear Combinations of Order Statistics, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, 52, 1990, pp. 105–124.

Milewska A., Zukowska J.; An Attempt of Apply the Weibull Distribution in Road Traffic Losses Analysis, Journal of KONBiN, 4, 2008.

Nemes G.; New asymptotic expansion for the

Information

Information: Schedae Informaticae, 2011, Volume 20, pp. 67 - 82

Article type: Original article

Titles:

Polish:

An Experimental Comparison of Popular Estimation Methods for the Weibull, Gamma and Gompertz Distributions

English:

An Experimental Comparison of Popular Estimation Methods for the Weibull, Gamma and Gompertz Distributions

Published at: 23.01.2012

Article status: Open

Licence: None

Percentage share of authors:

Iwona Żerda (Author) - 100%

Article corrections:

-

Publication languages:

English