An Experimental Comparison of Popular Estimation Methods for the Weibull, Gamma and Gompertz Distributions
cytuj
pobierz pliki
RIS BIB ENDNOTEChoose format
RIS BIB ENDNOTEAn Experimental Comparison of Popular Estimation Methods for the Weibull, Gamma and Gompertz Distributions
Publication date: 23.01.2012
Schedae Informaticae, 2011, Volume 20, pp. 67 - 82
https://doi.org/10.4467/20838476SI.11.003.0289Authors
An Experimental Comparison of Popular Estimation Methods for the Weibull, Gamma and Gompertz Distributions
The aim of this study was to describe some parametric estimation methods for the Weibull, gamma and Gompertz distributions and to identify among them estimators the most efficient in practical applications. Techniques which are considered as traditional methods, like the maximum likelihood (MLE) and the method of moments (MM) estimation but also some newer and less commonly used techniques like the Lmoment estimator (LME), least-square estimator (LSE), generalized spacing estimator (GSE) and percentile estimator (PE) were presented. The application of each method was demonstrated in a simulation study using data sets generated for different distribution parameters and sample sizes. Discussed estimators were compared in terms of their efficiency and bias measured by mean-square errors (MSE) based on the simulations results.
Aldrich J.; R.A. Fisher and the Making of Maximum Likelihood 1912-1922, Statistical Science, 12, 1997, pp. 162–176.
Anatolyev S., Kosenok G.; An Alternative to Maximum Likelihood Based on Spacings, Econometric Theory, 21, 2005, pp. 472–476.
Benard A., Bos-Levenbach E.C.; Het uitzetten van waarnemingen op waarschijnlijkdeidspapier (The Plotting of Observations on Probability Paper), Statististica Neerlandica, 7, 1953, pp. 163–173.
Cheng R.C.H., Amin N.A.K.; Estimating Parameters in Continuous Univariate Distributions with a Shifted Origin, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, 45, 1983, pp. 394–403.
Cramer H.; Mathematical Methods of Statistics, Princeton University Press, 1946.
d’Agostino R.B., Stephens M.A.; Goodness-of-fit techniques, Marcel Dekker INC, 1986.
Ekstrom M.; On the consistency of the maximum spacing method, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 70, 1998, pp. 209–224.
Ekstrom M.; Consistency of Generalized Maximum Spacing Estimates, Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 28, 2001, pp. 343–354.
Ghosh K., Jammalamadaka S.R.; A general estimation method using spacings, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 93, 2001, pp. 71–82.
Hosking J.R.M.; L-Moments: Analysis and Estimation of Distributions Using Linear Combinations of Order Statistics, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, 52, 1990, pp. 105–124.
Milewska A., Zukowska J.; An Attempt of Apply the Weibull Distribution in Road Traffic Losses Analysis, Journal of KONBiN, 4, 2008.
Nemes G.; New asymptotic expansion for the
Information: Schedae Informaticae, 2011, Volume 20, pp. 67 - 82
Article type: Original article
Titles:
An Experimental Comparison of Popular Estimation Methods for the Weibull, Gamma and Gompertz Distributions
An Experimental Comparison of Popular Estimation Methods for the Weibull, Gamma and Gompertz Distributions
Published at: 23.01.2012
Article status: Open
Licence: None
Percentage share of authors:
Article corrections:
-Publication languages:
EnglishView count: 2346
Number of downloads: 1052