The Repatriation of Human Remains in France: 20 Years of (Mal)practice

Sophie Vigneron

Titles

Abstract

This article analyses three cases of repatriation of human remains by French public museums in order to critically examine the difficulties in the changing institutional practice. It critically ssesses the statutory and administrative processes that have been used to repatriate human remains and identifies the difficulties that have been and are mostly still encountered. Firstly, it evaluates the public/private conundrum of ownership of human remains in French law, which explains why Parliament had to intervene to facilitate the repatriation of remains in public museum collections, whereas a private society could repatriate the skulls of chief Ataï and his doctor to New Caledonia without legal difficulties. Secondly, it reviews the need for parliamentary intervention for the repatriation of the remains of Saartjie Baartman to South Africa and several Mokomokai to New Zealand. Finally, it criticizes the administrative deadlock that has prevented the development of a repatriation practice that could have b en established after the successful repatriation of the remains of Vamaica Peru to Uruguay. Unfortunately, the process has remained opaque and ineffective, owing to a variety of factors; in particular the ambiguity regarding the role of the Commission scientifique nationale des collections, which is set to be abolished and whose role will be undertaken by the Haut conseil des Musées de France, and a lack of political, financial, and structural support from the Ministry of Culture. Until these shortcomings are addressed and clear criteria for repatriation are drawn up, it is unlikely that France will develop a coherent, transparent, and effective process for the repatriation of human remains.

Keywords

human remains, repatriation, France, Maori, Commission scientifique nationale des collections

References

Administrative Court of Appeal of Douai, Decision of 24 July 2008, “Actualité juridique de droit administratif” 2008.

Administrative Tribunal of Rouen, Decision of 27 December 2007, “Panorama (Dalloz)” 2008.

Bailey M., London’s National Army Museum to Return Emperor’s Hair to Ethiopia, “Art Newspaper”, 4 March 2019, https://www.theartnewspaper.com/news/london-s-national-army-museum-to-return-emperor-s-hair-to-ethiopia [accessed: 04.03.2019].

Bailey M., Oxford Museum Rethinks Famed Display of Shrunken Heads, “Art Newspaper”, 6 March 2019, https://www.theartnewspaper.com/news/oxford-museum-rethinksfamed-display-of-shrunken-heads [accessed: 11.03.2019].

Bayer K., 60 Maori and Moriori Heads and Skulls Repatriated from UK and US, “New Zealand Herald” 12 May 2016, http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid= 11638270 [accessed: 30.03.2020].

Bel M., Berger M., Paterson R.K., Administrative Tribunal of Rouen, Decision No. 702737, December 27, 2007 (Maori Head Case), “International Journal of Cultural Property” 2008, Vol. 15.

Blanchard P., Daeninckx D., Un chef revient parmi les siens, “Le Monde”, 10 August 2013.

Breske A., Politics of Repatriation: Formalizing Indigenous Repatriation Policy, “International Journal of Cultural Property” 2018, Vol. 25.

Brown M.F., Bruchac M., NAGPRA from the Middle Distance, Legal Puzzles and Unintended Consequences, in: J.H. Merryman (ed.), Imperialism, Art and Restitution, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2006.

Code civil [French Civil Code], 15 March 1803, as amended.

Code général de la propriété des personnes publiques [Public Bodies’ Property Code], 21 April 2006.

Comptes rendus de la Commission de la Culture, de l’Education et de la Communication, Mme Catherine Morin-Desailly, présidente. Restitution des biens culturels – Audition de M. Michel Van Praët, professeur émérite du Museum national d’histoire naturelle, membre de la Commission scientifique nationale des collections, 15 January 2020, http://www.senat.fr/compte-rendu-commissions/20200113/cult.html [accessed: 20.02.2020].

Comptes rendus de la Commission de la Culture, de l’Education et de la Communication, Mme Catherine Morin-Desailly, présidente. Restitution des biens culturels – Audition de M. Stéphane Martin, ancien président de l’établissement public du musée du Quai Branly – Jacques Chirac, 19 February 2020, http://www.senat.fr/compte-rendu-commissions/20200217/cult.html [accessed: 02.03.2020].

Comptes rendus de la Commission de la Culture, de l’Education et de la Communication, Mme Catherine Morin-Desailly, présidente. Restitution des biens culturels – Audition de M. Jacques Sallois, ancien président de la Commission scientifique nationale des collections, 15 January 2020, http://www.senat.fr/compte-rendu-commissions/20200113/cult.html [accessed: 20.02.2020].

Comptes rendus de la Commission de la Culture, de l’Education et de la Communication, Mme Catherine Morin-Desailly, présidente. Audition de M. Jacques Sallois, président de la commission scientifique nationale des collections (CNSC), sur le rapport de cette commission au Parlement, 18 March 2015, http://www.senat.fr/compte-rendu-commissions/20150316/cult.html#toc3 [accessed: 13.03.2020].

Comptes rendus de la Commission de la Culture, de l’Education et de la Communication, Mme Catherine Morin-Desailly, présidente. Organismes extra-parlementaires – Communications, 4 December 2019, http://www.senat.fr/compte-rendu-commissions/20191202/cult.html [accessed: 20.02.2020].

Cornu M., France, in: T. Kono (ed.), The Impact of Uniform Laws on the Protection of Cultural Heritage and the Preservation of Cultural Heritage in the 21st Century, Martinus Nijhoff, Leiden 2010.

Cornu M., Fromageau J. (eds.), Dictionnaire compare du droit du patrimoine culturel, CNRS, Paris 2012.

Cornu M., Mallet-Poujol N., Droit, oeuvres d’art et musées, protection et valorisation des collections, 2nd ed., CNRS éditions, Paris 2006.

Cornu M., Renold M.-A., New Developments in the Restitution of Cultural Property: Alternative Means of Dispute Resolution, “International Journal of Cultural Property” 2010, Vol. 17(1).

Court of Cassation (France), First Civil Chamber, Case No. 70-12.490, Judgment of 23 February 1972, Bulletin civ. 1 n. 61 p. 54.

Davies C., Property Rights in Human Remains and Artefacts and the Question of Repatriation, “Newcastle Law Review” 2004, Vol. 8.

Décret n° 92-1338 du 22 décembre 1992 portant création de l’Etablissement public du musée du Louvre [Decree No. 92-1338 of 22 December 1992 Creating the Public Establishment of the Louvre Museum], Journal officiel de la République française, 23 December 1992.

Department for Culture, Media and Sport, Guidance for the Care of Human Remains in Museums, October 2005.

Frerking C., Gill-Frerking H., Human Remains as Heritage: Categorisation, Legislation and Protection, “Art Antiquity & Law” 2017, Vol. 22. Garcia C., La France va collaborer avec l’Australie pour la restitution de restes humains aborigènes, “Le Journal des Arts”, 20 November 2014, https://www.lejournaldesarts.fr/patrimoine/la-france-va-collaborer-avec-laustralie-pour-la-restitution-de-restes-humains-aborigenes [accessed: 10.05.2019].

Gremillet D., Kasbarian G., Rapport n° 66 fait au nom de la commission mixte paritaire (21 October 2020) http://www.senat.fr/rap/l20-066/l20-066.html [accessed: 27.10.2020].

Groupe de travail sur la problématique des restes humains dans les collections publiques (GTPRH), Les restes humains dans les collections publiques, Office de coopération et d’information muséales, Dijon 2019.

Harris F., Understanding Human Remains Repatriation: Practice Procedures at the British Museum and the Natural History Museum, “Museum Management and Curatorship” 2015, Vol. 30.

Hickley C., Germany Returns Indigenous Remains of 45 Ancestors to Australia in ‘Long Overdue Step’, “Art Newspaper”, 29 November 2019, https://www.theartnewspaper.com/news/germany-returns-indigenous-remains-of-45-ancestors-to-australia-in-longoverdue-step [accessed: 09.12.2019].

Huffer D., Chappell D., The Mainly Nameless and Faceless Dead: An Exploratory Study of the Illicit Traffic in Archaeological and Ethnographic Human Remains, “Crime, Law and Social Change” 2014, Vol. 62.

Huffer D., Graham S., Fleshing Out the Bones: Studying the Human Remains Trade with Tensorflow and Inception, “Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology” 2018, Vol. 1.

Jenkins T., Keeping their Marbles, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2016.

Keeler H., Indigenous International Repatriation, “Arizona State Law Journal” 2012, Vol. 44.

Krmpotich C., Remembering and Repatriation: The Production of Kinship, Memory and Respect, “Journal of Material Culture” 2010, Vol. 15.

Krmpotich C., Repatriation and the Generation of Material Culture, “Mortality” 2011, Vol. 16.

Lambert-Pennington K., What Remains? Reconciling Repatriation, Aboriginal Culture, Representation and the Past, “Oceania” 2007, Vol. 77(3).

Le Garrec J., Rapport 3563 sur la proposition de loi adoptée par le Sénat relative à la restitution par la France de la dépouille mortelle de Saartjie Baartman à l’Afrique du Sud, Assemblée nationale, Commission des affaires culturelles, 30 January 2002.

Le Moal C., Rapport 2447 sur la proposition de loi adoptée par le Sénat visant à autoriser la restitution par la France des têtes maories à la Nouvelle-Zélande et relative à la gestion des collections, Assemblée nationale, Commission des affaires culturelles, 7 April 2010.

Lenzerini F., Cultural Identity, Human Rights, and Repatriation of Cultural Heritage of Indigenous Peoples, “The Brown Journal of World Affairs” 2016, Vol. 23.

Lenzerini F., The Tension between Communities’ Cultural Rights and Global Interests: The Case of the Maori Mokomokai, in: S. Borelli, F. Lenzerini (eds.), Cultural Heritage, Cultural Rights, Cultural Diversity: New Developments in International Law, Brill Nijhoff, Leiden 2012.

Loi n° 2002-323 du 6 mars 2002 relative à la restitution par la France de la dépouille mortelle de Saartjie Baartman à l’Afrique du Sud [Law No. 2002-323 of 6 March 2002 Relating to the Restitution of the Remains of Saartjie Baartman by France to South Africa], Journal officiel de la République française, 7 March 2002.

Loi n° 2010-501 du 18 mai 2010 visant à autoriser la restitution par la France des têtes maories à la Nouvelle-Zélande et relative à la gestion des collections [Law No. 2010-501 of 18 May 2010 to Authorise the Return of Maori Heads to New Zealand by France and Relating to the Management of Collections], Journal officiel de la République française, 19 May 2010.

Loi n° 2020-1525 du 7 décembre 2020 d’accélération et de simplification de l’action publique [Law No. 2020-1525 of 7 December 2020 for the Improvement of Efficiency of Public Decision Making], Journal officiel de la République française, 8 December 2020.

Loiseau G., Des cadavres mais des hommes, note sous CA Paris 30 avril 2009, “Semaine Juridique”, 15 June 2009.

Merryman J., Two Ways of Thinking about Cultural Property, “American Journal of International Law” 1986, Vol. 80(4).

Morin-Desailly C., Restitution de la tête maori de Rouen: enfin l’épilogue heureux d’une formidable aventure humaine, Press release, 27.04.2011.

Moudileno L., Returning Remains: Saartjie Baartman, or the “Hottentot Venus” as Transnational Postcolonial Icon, “Forum for Modern Language Studies” 2009, Vol. 45.

Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, International Repatriation, https://www.tepapa.govt.nz/international-repatriation [accessed: 08.04.2019].

Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, Repatriation, https://www.tepapa.govt.nz/about/repatriation [accessed: 30.03.2020].

Natural History Museum, Museum Returns Remains to Torres Strait Islands, 10 March 2011, https://web.archive.org/web/20150628094224/http://www.nhm.ac.uk/about-us/news/2011/march/museum-returns-remains-to-torres-strait-islands95251.html [accessed: 03.10.2020].

Our Body: The Universe Within, Standard Process of Plastination, http://www.ourbodytheuniversewithin.com [accessed: 04.10.2020].

Overholtzer L., Argueta J.R., Letting Skeletons out of the Closet: The Ethics of Displaying Ancient Mexican Human Remains, “International Journal of Heritage Studies” 2018, Vol. 24.

Pfeiffer S., Lesage L., The Repatriation of Wendat Ancestors, 2013, “Canadian Journal of Archaeology” 2014, Vol. 38.

Projet de loi n° 307 d’accélération et de simplification de l’action publique, 5 February 2020 http://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/dyn/15/dossiers/acceleration_simplification_action_publique?etape=15-SN1-DEPOT [accessed: 27.10.2020].

Projet de loi accélération et simplification de l’action publique, Sénat, 3 March 2020 http://www.senat.fr/seances/s202003/s20200303/s20200303021.html#section2355 [accessed: 27.10.2020].

Projet de loi nº 484, modifié, par l’Assemblée nationale, d’accélération et de simplification de l’action publique (6 October 2020) http://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/dyn/15/textes/l15t0484_texte-adopte-seance#B3805787492 [accessed: 27.10.2020].

Question N° 10652 de Mme Fadila Khattabi, 15ème legislature, 2018, http://questions.assemblee-nationale.fr/q15/15-10652QE.htm [accessed: 04.03.2019].

Question N° 3325 de M. M’jid El Guerrab, 15ème legislature, 2018, http://questions.assemblee-nationale.fr/q15/15-3325QE.htm [accessed: 04.03.2019].

Question N° 35855 de Mme Huguette Bello, 14ème legislature, 2013, http://questions.assemblee-nationale.fr/q14/14-35855QE.htm [accessed: 04.03.2019].

Question N° 83570 de M. Thierry Lazaro, 14ème legislature, 2016, http://questions.assemblee-nationale.fr/q14/14-83570QE.htm [accessed: 09.03.2019].

Rapport au Parlement de la Commission scientifique nationale des collections (CSNC). Annexes:1re partie, 11 February 2015.

Rassool C., Re-storing the Skeletons of Empire: Return, Reburial and Rehumanisation in Southern Africa, “Journal of Southern African Studies” 2015, Vol. 41.

Reinius L.G., The Ritual Labor of Reconciliation: An Autoethnography of a Return of Human Remains, “Museum Worlds” 2017, Vol. 5.

Restitution de la «Vénus hottentote», Journal officiel de la République française. Assemblée nationale. Débats parlementaires, 21 February 2002, http://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/11/cri/html/20020142.asp [accessed: 29.03.2019].

Restitution des têtes maories, Journal officiel de la République française. Assemblée nationale. Compte rendu intégral, 30 April 2010, http://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/13/pdf/cri/2009-2010/20100172.pdf [accessed: 11.07.2019].

Restitution des têtes maories, Journal officiel de la République française. Assemblée nationale. Compte rendu intégral, 4 May 2010, http://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/13/pdf/cri/2009-2010/20100176.pdf [accessed: 11.07.2019].

Restitution par la France des têtes maories, Journal officiel de la République française. Sénat. Compte rendu intégral, 29 June 2009, http://www.senat.fr/seances/s200906/s20090629/s20090629.pdf [accessed: 11.07.2019].

Richardson R., Death, Dissection and the Destitute, 2nd ed., University of Chicago Press, Chicago 2000.

Richert P., Rapport 177 sur la proposition de loi autorisant la restitution par la France de la dépouille mortelle de Saartjie Baartman, dite «Vénus hottentote» à l’Afrique du Sud, Sénat, Commission des affaires culturelles, 23 January 2002.

Richert P., Rapport 379 sur La gestion des collections des musées, Sénat, Commission des affaires culturelles, 3 July 2003.

Richert P., Rapport 482 sur la Proposition de loi visant à autoriser la restitution par la France des têtes maories, Sénat, Commission des affaires culturelles, 23 June 2009.

Rigaud J., Réflexion sur la possibilité pour les opérateurs publics d’aliéner des oeuvres de leurs collections, Ministère de la Culture et de la Communication, 6 February 2008, https://www.vie-publique.fr/sites/default/files/rapport/pdf/084000071.pdf [accessed: 17.05.2019].

Rivet P., Les derniers Charruas, “Revista de la Sociedad «Amigos de la Arqueología»” 1930.

Saartjie Baartman Is Finally, Finally Home, “New African” 2002, Vol. 408.

Sardier T., Benjamin Stora : «La restitution de dépouilles à l’Algérie s’inscrit dans une accélération du travail mémoriel», “Libération”, 9 July 2020, https://www.liberation.fr/debats/2020/07/09/benjamin-stora-la-restitution-de-depouilles-a-l-algerie-s-inscrit-dans-une-acceleration-du-travail-m_1793846 [accessed: 27.10.2020].

Sarr F., Savoy B., The Restitution of African Cultural Heritage. Toward a New Relational Ethics, November 2018, http://restitutionreport2018.com [accessed: 30.03.2020].

Saujot C., Inaliénabilité reconnue aux collections muséales : le recours à la procédure de déclassement doit être respectée, “La Semaine Juridique” 2008.

Seidemann R.M., Altered Meanings: The Department of the Interior’s Rewriting of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act to Regulate Culturally Unidentifiable Human Remains, “Temple Journal of Science, Technology & Environmental Law” 2009,Vol. 28

Seidemann R.M., Bones of Contention: A Comparative Examination of Law Governing Human Remains from Archaeological Contexts in Formerly Colonial Countries, “Louisiana Law Review” 2004, Vol. 64.

Tsosie R.A., Privileging Claims to the Past: Ancient Human Remains and Contemporary Cultural Values, “Arizona State Law Journal” 1999, Vol. 31.

United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous People, A/RES/61/295, 13 September 2007.

Upham M., From the Venus Sickness to the Hottentot Venus. Saartjie Baartman and the Three Men in Her Life: Alexander Dunlop, Hendrik Caesar and Jean Riaux, “Quarterly Bulletin of the National Library of South Africa” 2007, Vol. 61.

Van Praët M., Saartjie Baartman, Une restitution témoin d’un contexte muséal en évolution, in: C. Blanckaert (ed.), La Vénus hottentote: entre Barnum et Muséum, Publications Scientifiques du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris 2013.

White L., The Traffic in Heads: Bodies, Borders and the Articulation of Regional Histories, “Journal of Southern African Studies” 1997, Vol. 23.

World Archaeological Congress, Code of Ethics, https://worldarch.org/code-of-ethics/ [accessed: 30.03.2020].

World Archaeological Congress, Codes of Ethics, https://web.archive.org/web/20071224200459/http://www.worldarchaeologicalcongress.org/site/about_ethi.php [accessed: 04.10.2020].

World Intellectual Property Organization, Mataatua Declaration on Cultural and Intellectual Property Rights of Indigenous Peoples, https://www.wipo.int/tk/en/databases/creative_heritage/indigenous/link0002.html [accessed: 05.03.2020].

Information

Information: Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2020, 2/2020 (6), pp. 313 - 338

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSNR.20.022.13025

Article type: Original article

Titles:

Polish:

The Repatriation of Human Remains in France: 20 Years of (Mal)practice

English:

The Repatriation of Human Remains in France: 20 Years of (Mal)practice

Authors

Sophie Vigneron

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8667-4406

Kent Law School University of Kent Canterbury, Kent England, CT2 7NS, United Kingdom

Published at: 2020

Article status: Open

Licence: CC BY-NC-ND

Percentage share of authors:

Sophie Vigneron (Author) - 100%

Article corrections:

-

Publication languages:

English

View count: 1464

Number of downloads: 2367

<p> The Repatriation of Human Remains in France: 20 Years of (Mal)practice</p>

Pobierz pełny tekst

Titles

Abstract

Keywords

References

Information

Authors