The Intangible Cultural Heritage System: Many Challenges, Few Proposals

Ahmed Skounti

Titles

Abstract

The 2003 Convention is one of the most powerful normative instruments of UNESCO in the fields of culture and cultural heritage. Ten years after its entry into force, it’s worth scrutinizing its implementation globally. One hundred and seventy-four States have become parties to the Convention as of 12 May 2017. Four hundred and twenty-nine elements and 17 programs, activities, and projects have been inscribed altogether on the Urgent Safeguarding List and Representative List or selected on the Register of Good Safeguarding Practices. The 2003 Convention has given birth to what I propose to call an “Intangible Cultural Heritage System” (“ICH System”): a constellation of actors either on the local, national, or international levels who contribute, in different ways, to its implementation. This paper examines the main challenges posed to this system in the last decade. It focuses on key-issues to which the 2003 Convention is confronted today: the universality of the concept of ICH, the governance of the 2003 Convention and its implementation on the international, national, and local levels, the listing process, including its positive and negative effects, the role of communities and other stakeholders in the implementation process, and the impact of safeguarding on ICH elements. Through a critical approach, both from inside and outside the functioning of the ICH System, the main objective of the paper is to make a contribution to the efforts seeking at the enhancement of the safeguarding worldwide. Its aim is a contribution both to the academic research in the field of heritage

studies and to the improvement of the implementation worldwide.

The 2003 Convention is one of the most powerful normative instruments of UNESCO in the fields of culture and cultural heritage. Ten years after its entry into force, it’s worth scrutinizing its implementation globally. One hundred and seventy-four States have become parties to the Convention as of 12 May 2017. Four hundred and twenty-nine elements and 17 programs, activities, and projects have been inscribed altogether on the Urgent Safeguarding List and Representative List or selected on the Register of Good Safeguarding Practices. The 2003 Convention has given birth to what I propose to call an “Intangible Cultural Heritage System” (“ICH System”): a constellation of actors either on the local, national, or international levels who contribute, in different ways, to its implementation. This paper examines the main challenges posed to this system in the last decade. It focuses on key-issues to which the 2003 Convention is confronted today: the universality of the concept of ICH, the governance of the 2003 Convention and its implementation on the international, national, and local levels, the listing process, including its positive and negative effects, the role of communities and other stakeholders in the implementation process, and the impact of safeguarding on ICH elements. Through a critical approach, both from inside and outside the functioning of the ICH System, the main objective of the paper is to make a contribution to the efforts seeking at the enhancement of the safeguarding worldwide. Its aim is a contribution both to the academic research in the field of heritage

studies and to the improvement of the implementation worldwide.

Keywords

Intangible Cultural Heritage System, the 2003 Convention, UNESCO, universality, safeguarding, communities, governance

References

Adell N. et al. (eds.), Between Imagined Communities and Communities of Practice: Participation, Territory and the Making of Heritage, Universitätsverlag Göttingen, Göttingen 2015.

Aikawa-Faure N., From the Proclamation of Masterpieces to the Convention for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage, in: L. Smith, N. Akagawa (eds.), Intangible Heritage, Routledge, London – New York 2009.

Blake J., UNESCO’s 2003 Convention on Intangible Cultural Heritage. The Implications of Community Involvement in “Safeguarding”, in: L. Smith, N. Akagawa (eds.), Intangible Heritage, Routledge, London – New York 2009.

Bortolotto C., Authenticity: A Non-Criterion for Inscription on the Lists of UNESCO’s Intangible Heritage Convention, in: The Second ICH Researchers Forum of 2003 Convention, International Research Centre for Intangible Cultural Heritage in the Asia-Pacific Region (IRCI), Tokyo 2013.

Bortolotto C., UNESCO and Heritage Self-Determination: Negotiating Meaning in the Intergovernmental Committee for the Safeguarding of the ICH, in: N. Adell et al. (eds.), Between Imagined Communities and Communities of Practice Participation, Territory and the Making of Heritage, Universitätsverlag Göttingen, Göttingen 2015.

Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage, 17 October 2003, 2368 UNTS 1.

Duvelle C., A Decade of Implementation of the Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage, “Ethnologies (Québec)” 2014, Vol. 36(1-2).

Eco U., Le Vertige de la Liste, Flammarion, Paris 2009.

Fredheim L.H., Khalaf M., The Significance of Values: Heritage Value Typologies Re-Examined, “International Journal of Heritage Studies” 2016, Vol. 22(6).

Jacobs M., The Spirit of the Convention – Interlocking Principles and Ethics for the Safeguarding Intangible Cultural Heritage, “International Journal of Intangible Heritage” 2016, Vol. 11.

Kono T. (ed.), Intangible Cultural Heritage and Intellectual Property: Communities, Cultural Diversity and Sustainable Development, Intersentia, Antwerp – Oxford – Portland 2009.

Kono T., Taking Stock of the Elements Inscribed on the Lists: Actual Trends, Categories and Examples, 2012, http://ich.unesco.org/doc/src/ITH-12-7.COM_WG-4-EN.doc [accessed: 28.06.2017].

Kurin R., U.S. Consideration of the Intangible Cultural Heritage Convention, “Ethnologies (Québec)” 2014, Vol. 36(1-2).

Kuutma K., Who Owns Our Songs? Authority of Heritage and Resources for Restitution, “Ethnologia Europaea” 2009, Vol. 39(2).

Labadi S., UNESCO, Cultural Heritage and Outstanding Universal Value: Value-based Analyses of the World Heritage and Intangible Cultural Heritage, AltaMira, Lanham 2013.

Pocius G.L., The Government of Canada and Intangible Cultural Heritage, “Ethnologies

(Québec)” 2014, Vol. 36(1-2).

Rudolff B., Raymond S., A Community Convention? An Analysis of Free, Prior and Informed Consent

Given under the 2003 Convention, “International Journal of Intangible Heritage”

2013, Vol. 8.

Schreiber H., Intangible Cultural Heritage and Soft Power: Exploring the Relationship, “International

Journal of Intangible Heritage” 2017, Vol. 12.

Skounti A., Possible Ways to Deal with “Similar Elements”: The Extension of an Inscribed Element and the Nomination of “Serial Elements”, 2012, http://ich.unesco.org/doc/src/ITH-12-7. COM_WG-5-EN.doc [accessed: 28.06.2017].

Skounti A., Réflexions sur les critères d’inscription sur les listes de la Convention du patrimoine culturel immatériel, in: The First ICH Researchers Forum of 2003 Convention, International Research Centre for Intangible Cultural Heritage in the Asia-Pacific Region (IRCI), Tokyo 2012.

Skounti A., The Authentic Illusion: Humanity’s Intangible Cultural Heritage, the Moroccan Experience, in: L. Smith, N. Akagawa (eds.), Intangible Heritage, Routledge, London – New York 2009.

Smith L., Uses of Heritage, Routledge, London – New York 2006.

UNESCO Operational Directives for the Implementation of the Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage, 2016 version.

Information

Information: Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2017, 2/2017 (3), pp. 61 - 76

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSNR.17.022.8423

Article type: Original article

Titles:

Polish:

The Intangible Cultural Heritage System: Many Challenges, Few Proposals

English:

The Intangible Cultural Heritage System: Many Challenges, Few Proposals

Authors

Ahmed Skounti

Department of Anthropology National Institute of Archaeology and Heritage Sciences Rabat, Morocco

Published at: 03.07.2018

Article status: Open

Licence: CC BY-NC-ND

Percentage share of authors:

Ahmed Skounti (Author) - 100%

Article corrections:

-

Publication languages:

English

View count: 3799

Number of downloads: 1788

<p> The Intangible Cultural Heritage System: Many Challenges, Few Proposals</p>

Pobierz pełny tekst

Titles

Abstract

Keywords

References

Information

Authors