Adebiyi B., Legal and Other Issues in Repatriating Nigeria’s Looted Artefacts, independently published, 2009.

Autocephalous Greek-Orthodox Church of Cyprus v. Goldberg, 717 F. Supp. 1374 (S.D. Ind. 1989), aff’d, 917 F.2d 278, 294 (7th Cir. 1990).

Autocephalous Greek-Orthodox Church v. Goldberg Feldman Fine Arts, Inc., 917 F.2d 278, 294 (7th Cir. 1990).

Bakalar v. Vavra, 819 F. Supp. 2d 293, 306 (2d Cir. N.Y. 2010).

Bundesgesetz über den internationalen Kulturgütertransfer (Kulturgütertransfergesetz, KGTG) [Swiss Federal Act on the International Transfer of Cultural Property], 20 June 2003, AS 2005, pp. 1869 ff., as amended.

Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch [German Civil Code].

Burgerlijk Wetboek [Dutch Civil Code].

Cenini M., Gli acquisti a non domino, Giuffrè, Milano 2009.

Code civil [French Civil Code].

Codice civile [Italian Civil Code].

Comporti M., Per una diversa lettura dell’articolo 1153 cod. civ. a tutela dei beni culturali, in: Scritti in onore di Luigi Mengoni, Vol. 1, Giuffrè, Milano 1995.

Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict, 14 May 1954, 249 UNTS 240.

Council Directive 93/7/EEC of 15 March 1993 on the return of cultural objects unlawfully removed from the territory of a Member State, OJ L 74, 27.03.1993, p. 74.

Council of Europe Convention on Offences relating to Cultural Property, 19 March 2017, CETS 221.

Council Regulation (EEC) No. 3911/92 of 9 December 1992 on the export of cultural goods, OJ L 395, 31.12.1992, p. 1.

Court of Appeal, The Queen (Kathleen Elizabeth Simonis) v. Arts Council England v. Ministero dei Beni e delle Attività Culturali e del Turismo, The Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, [2020] EWCA 374 (Civ).

Criminal Tribunal of Pesaro, Order No. 35-2016 of 8 June 2018.

Decreto Legislativo 22 gennaio 2004, n. 42: Codice dei beni culturali e del paesaggio [Legislative Decree No. 42 of 22 January 2004: Code of Cultural Heritage and Landscape], Gazzetta Ufficiale No. 45.

Directive 2014/60/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on the return of cultural objects unlawfully removed from the territory of a Member State and amending Regulation (EU) No. 1024/2012 (Recast), OJ L 159, 28.05.2014, p. 1.

Draft Convention Providing a Uniform Law On the Acquisition in Good Faith of Corporeal Movables, “Uniform Law Review” 1975, Vol. os-3(1).

DuBoff L., Murray M.D., Art Law. Cases and Materials, 2nd ed., Aspen Publishing, Frederick, MD 2018.

Fincham D., Towards a Rigorous Standard for the Good Faith Acquisition of Antiquities, “Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce” 2010, Vol. 37(2).

Fontaine M., Best Efforts, Reasonable Care, Due Diligence et règles de l’art dans le contrats internationaux, “Revue de droit des affaires internationales” 1988, Vol. 8.

Gerstenblith P., Art, Cultural Heritage, and the Law, Carolina Academic Press, Durham, NC 2018.

Gesetz zum Schutz von Kulturgut [Cultural Property Protection Act], 31 July 2016, Federal Law Gazette (BGBl.) Part I, p. 1914.

Giardini G., Taming the Italian ‘Trojan Horse’: The a non domino Sales of Cultural Objects, “Uniform Law Review” 2023, Vol. 28(1).

Giardini G., The Principle of International Restitution of Cultural Property in the 1954 Hague Convention: the UNIDROIT Contribution, “Uniform Law Review” 2018, Vol. 23(1).

Gröschler P., L’acquisto a non domino dei beni mobili nell’ordinamento tedesco tra diritto germanico e tempi moderni, “Cultura giuridica e diritto vivente” 2020, Vol. 7.

Jagielska-Burduk A., Nabycie własności dobra kultury od nieuprawnionego: wybrane zagadnienia [Purchase of a Cultural Object from a Non-Owner: Selected Problems], “Santander Art and Culture Law Review” 2015, Vol. 1(1).

Kono T. (ed.), The Impact of Uniform Laws on the Protection of Cultural Heritage and the Preservation of Cultural Heritage in the 21st Century, Martinus Nijhoff, Leiden–Boston 2010.

Lalive P., A Disturbing International Convention: UNIDROIT, “Art Antiquity and Law” 1999, Vol. 4(3).

Last K.V., The Resolution of Cultural Property Disputes: Some Issues of Definition, in: The Resolution of Cultural Property Disputes, Kluwer Law International, The Hague 2004.

Lee v. Bayes (and Robinson S. C. 25 L. J. C. P. 249; 2 Jur. N. S. 1093).

Lixinski L., Central and South America, in: F. Francioni, A.F. Vrdoljak (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Cultural Heritage Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2020.

Magri G., L’acquisto a non domino tra diritto privato italiano e tendenze europee, “Cultura giuridica e diritto vivente” 2020, Vol. 7.

Matteucci M., La protection des biens culturels en cas de conflits armés: une initiative italienne, 1977 (unpublished).

Matteucci M., Nota sulla Convenzione per la protezione dei beni culturali in caso di conflitto armato, “Rivista di Diritto Internazionale” 1958, Vol. 41.

Mautner M., “The Eternal Triangles of the Law”: Toward a Theory of Priorities in Conflicts Involing Remote Parties, “Michigan Law Review” 1991, Vol. 90(1).

Menzel v. List, 246 N.E.2d 742, 745 (N.Y. 1969).

Merryman J.H., Cultural Property Internationalism, “International Journal of Cultural Property” 1985, Vol. 12(1).

Merryman J.H., Two Ways of Thinking about Cultural Property, “The American Journal of International Law” 1986, Vol. 80(4).

N.Y. County District Attorney’s Office, Michael Steinhardt’s Statement of Fact, 6 December 2021.

Noth M.G., Noth E.K., Switzerland’s New Federal Act on the International Transfer of Cultural Property, “Art Antiquity and Law” 2005, Vol. 10(1).

O’Keefe P.J., Commentary on the UNESCO 1970 Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property, 2nd rev. ed., Institute of Art and Law, Builth Wells 2007.

O’Keefe R., Cultural Heritage and International Humanitarian Law, in: F. Francioni, A.F. Vrdoljak (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Cultural Heritage Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2020.

O’Keeffe v. Snyder, 416 A.2d 862, 872 (N.J. 1980).

Ouedraogo A., La due diligence en droit international: de la règle de la neutralité au principe general, “Revue générale de droit” 2012, Vol. 42(2).

People v. Agnello, 178 A.D. 2d 414, 416 (2d Dep’t 1991).

People v. Grossfeld, 216 A.D. 2d 319 (2d Dep’t 1995).

People v. Landfair, 191 A.D. 2d 825, 827 (3d Dep’t 1993).

People v. Reichbach, 131 A.D. 2d 515, 516 (2d Dep’t 1987).

Phelan M.E., Scope of Due Diligence Investigation in Obtaining Title to Valuable Artwork, “Seattle University Law Review” 2000, Vol. 23.

Porter v. Wertz, 416 N.Y.S.2d 254, 259 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979), aff’d, 421 N.E.2d 500 (N.Y. 1981).

Prott L.V., Commentary on the UNIDROIT Convention, Institute of Art and Law, Builth Wells 2nd rev. ed. 2020.

Prott L.V., The Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict (The Hague Convention) 1954, in: M. Briat, J.A. Freedberg (eds.), Legal Aspects of International Trade in Art, Kluwer Law International, The Hague 1996.

Prott L.V., The UNIDROIT Convention on Stolen or Illegally Exported Cultural Objects – Ten Years On, “Uniform Law Review” 2009, Vol. 14(1-2).

Prott L.V., UNESCO/UNIDROIT: A Partnership Against Trafficking in Cultural Objects, “Uniform Law Review” 1996, Vol. 1.

Reichelt G., La protection internationale des biens culturels, “Uniform Law Review” 1985, Vol. o.s. 13(1).

Reichelt G., Study LXX – Doc. 1: The Protection of Cultural Property, December 1986.

Renold M.-A., Stolen Art: The Ubiquitous Question of Good Faith, in: The Resolution of Cultural Property Disputes, Kluwer Law International, The Hague 2004.

Republic of Turkey v. Christie’s Inc., 17 Civ. 3086 (AJN) (S.D.N.Y. 2021).

Reversal in Two California Cases Prompt Debate on Time Limits, “IFAR Report” 1996, Vol. 17(5).

Roodt C., Private International Law, Art and Cultural Heritage, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham 2015.

Rossi R., Due Diligence in the Acquisition of Cultural Objects, “Uniform Law Review” 2015, Vol. 20(4).

Sacco R., Caterina R., Il possesso, 3rd ed., Giuffrè Editore, Milano 2014.

Sauveplanne J.G., Etudes XLV – Doc. 5: Les mesures protectrices relatives à la conservation des objets d’arts, 1963.

Schneider M., Protection and Return of Cultural Objects: The Interplay of Law and Ethics, in: Realising Cultural Heritage Law: Festschrift for Patrick Joseph O’Keefe, Institute of Art and Law, Builth Wells 2013.

Schneider M., The 1995 UNIDROIT Convention: An Indispensable Complement to the 1970 UNESCO Convention and an Inspiration for the 2014/60/EU Directive, “Santander Art and Culture Law Review” 2016, Vol. 2(2).

Schneider M., UNIDROIT Convention on Stolen or Illegally Exported Cultural Objects: Explanatory Report, “Uniform Law Review” 2001, Vol. 3.

Schwartz A., Scott R.E., Rethinking the Laws of Good Faith Purchase, “Columbia Law Review” 2011, Vol. 111, http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/4166/ [accessed: 04.05.2023].

Schweizerisches Zivilgesetzbuch [Swiss Civil Code], AS 24 233.

Sher H., Due Diligence Investigations, “Juta’s Business Law” 1988, Vol. 6(1).

Supreme Court of Cassation (Italy), 2nd Civil Section, Judgment No. 5349 of 18 February 2022.

Supreme Court of Cassation (Italy), 3rd Penal Section, Judgment No. 22 of 30 November 2018.

Supreme Court of Cassation (Italy), 3rd Penal Section, Judgment No. 42458 of 22 October 2015.

Szabados T., In Search of the Holy Grail of the Conflict of Laws of Cultural Property: Recent Trends in European Private International Law Codifications, “International Journal of Cultural Property” 2020, Vol. 27(3).

The Sale of Goods Act 1979 c. 54.

Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, OJ C 326, 26.10.2012, p. 47.

Trib. Torino, 25 marzo 1982, “Rivista di diritto internazionale privato e processuale” 1982.

UNESCO Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property, 14 November 1970, 823 UNTS 231.

UNESCO, Draft Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict, 11 July 1952, UNESCO Doc. CL/656.

UNESCO, Historical Note concerning the Draft Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict, 1 March 1954, UNESCO Doc. CBC/7.

UNESCO, Measures for Ensuring the Co-Operation of Interested States in the Protection, Preservation and Restoration of Antiquities, Monuments and Historic Sites; and Possibility of Establishing an International Fund to Subsidize Such Preservation and Restoration, 27 March 1950, UNESCO Doc. 5C/PRG/6.

UNESCO, Preliminary Draft Convention concerning the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property, 8 August 1969, UNESCO Doc. SHC/MD/3, Annex.

UNESCO Executive Board, Report on the Possibility of Drafting a Convention concerning the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property, 22 April 1968, UNESCO Doc. 78 EX/9.

UNIDROIT Convention on Stolen or Illegally Exported Cultural Objects, 24 June 1995, 2421 UNTS 457.

UNIDROIT Convention relating to a Uniform Law on the Formation of Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (ULFC), 1 July 1964, https://www.unidroit.org/instruments/ international-sales/ulfc-1964/ [accessed: 04.05.2023].

UNIDROIT Convention relating to a Uniform Law on the International Sale of Goods (ULIS), 1 July 1964, https://www.unidroit.org/english/conventions/1964ulis/convention-in-

ternational-sale-goods1964.pdf [accessed: 04.05.2023].

UNIDROIT, Brief Comparative Survey of the Legal Protection Afforded to the Holder under the Law Concerning the Transfer of Movable Property, U.D.P. 1953 – Etudes: XXXVIII, Cultural Property – Document 2, 5 March 1954, Appendix to UNESCO Doc. CBC/6.

UNIDROIT, Remarks of the International Institute for the Unification of Private Law on the Restitution of Cultural Property Which Has Changed Hands During a Military Occupation,

U.D.P. 1953 – Etudes: XXXVIII, Cultural Property – Document 1, 5 March 1954, UNESCO Doc. CBC/6.

UNIDROIT, Study LXX – Doc. 10: Summary Report on the First Session of the UNIDROIT Study Group on the International Protection of Cultural Property, January 1989.

UNIDROIT, Study LXX – Doc. 17: Communication from the Commission of the European Communities to the Council on the Protection of National Treasures Possessing Artistic, Historic or Archaeological Value: Needs Arising from the Abolition of Frontiers in 1992, December 1989.

UNIDROIT, Study LXX – Doc. 18: Summary Report on the Third Session of the UNIDROIT Study Group on the International Protection of Cultural Property, May 1990.

UNIDROIT, Study LXX – Doc. 23: Report on the First Session of the Committee of Governmental Experts on the International Protection of Cultural Property, July 1991.

United States v. 10th Century Cambodian Sandstone Sculpture, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45903, 7 (S.D.N.Y. 2013).

van Gaalen M., Verheij A., The Consequences for the Netherlands of the UNIDROIT Convention, “Art Antiquity and Law” 1998, Vol. 3(1). Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, 23 May 1969, 1155 UNTS 331.

Visconti A., Problemi e prospettive della tutela penale del patrimonio culturale, Giappichelli, Torino 2023.

Winkworth v. Christie Manson and Woods Ltd. [1980] 1 ER (Ch) 496.