FAQ

Soft Law in Promoting the Return of Zhaoling Two Steeds in Tang Dynasty

Publication date: 2020

Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2020, 2/2020 (6), pp. 293 - 312

https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSNR.20.021.13024

Authors

Li Weifang
School of International Law, East China University of Political Science and Law (ECUPL), 1575 Wanhangdu Rd, Changning District Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5387-0910 Orcid
All publications →

Titles

Soft Law in Promoting the Return of Zhaoling Two Steeds in Tang Dynasty

Abstract

It is generally accepted that stolen cultural objects shall be returned, but it is still a more complex and comparatively ambiguous matter when it comes to solving cases left over by history. The Six Stone Horse Reliefs are one of the most influential works of art in Chinese history, but unfortunately the beginning of 20th century witnessed the political and social upheaval of China, which resulted not only in people’s suffering but also in the loss of the cultural relics. The Six Stone Horse Reliefs were stolen and broken in China. Two of the six stone horses, called Sa Luzi and Quan Maogua, were illegally shipped to the United States and today are exhibited at the University Museum of Pennsylvania. While referring to the example of the Six Stone Horse Reliefs, this article puts forward the argument for using soft-law instruments to break through the shortcomings of existing international treaties and the limitations of domestic law.

References

Adler A., Review of Patrick J. O’Keefe Commentary on the 1970 UNESCO Convention, “Art Antiquity & Law” 2010, Vol. 15(3).

American Alliance of Museums, Archaeological Material and Ancient Art, https://www.aamus. org/programs/ethics-standards-and-professional-practices/archaeological-material-and-ancient-art/ [accessed: 25.04.2020].

American Alliance of Museums, Code of Ethics for Museums, https://www.aam-us.org/programs/ethics-standards-and-professional-practices/code-of-ethics-for-museums/ [accessed: 25.04.2020].

Archaeological Resources Protection Act, 16 U.S.C. §§ 470aa–470mm.

Bounia A., Codes of Ethics and Museum Research, “Journal of Conservation and Museum Studies” 2014, Vol. 12(1), https://www.jcms-journal.com/articles/10.5334/jcms.1021214/ [accessed: 25.04.2020].

Campfens E., Restitution of Looted Art: What About Access to Justice?, “Santander Art and Culture Law Review” 2018, Vol. 2(4).

Chen Wenping, 昭陵两骏流失海外真相新证 [New Evidence about the Loss of the Emperor’s Two Steeds from Zhao Mausoleum], “Collections” 2017, Vol. 2.

China Culture, Zhaoling Museum, http://en.chinaculture.org/library/2008-01/18/content_30789.htm [accessed: 25.04.2020].

Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict, 14 May 1954, 249 UNTS 240.

Convention on Cultural Property Implementation Act, https://eca.state.gov/files/bureau/97-446.pdf [accessed: 25.04.2020].

Convention on Stolen or Illegally Exported Cultural Objects, 24 June 1995, 34 ILM 1322.

Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property, 14 November 1970, 823 UNTS 231.

Cornu M., Renold M.-A., New Developments in the Restitution of Cultural Property: Alternative Means of Dispute Resolution, “International Journal of Cultural Property” 2010, Vol. 17(1).

Druzin B.H., Why Does Soft Law Have any Power Anyway?, “Asian Journal of International Law” 2017, Vol. 7(2).

Greek Orthodox Patriarchate of Jerusalem v. Christie’s, Inc., 98 Civ. 7664(KMW), 1999 U.S. Dist. (S.D.N.Y. 30 August 1999).

Guzman A.T., Meyer T.L., International Soft Law, “Journal of Legal Analysis” 2010, Vol. 2(1). ICOM, Code of Ethics for Museums, 2017, https://icom.museum/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/ICOM-code-En-web.pdf [accessed: 25.04.2020].

ICOM, Statutes, 2017, https://icom.museum/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/2017_ICOM_Statutes_EN.pdf [accessed: 25.04.2020].

ICOMOS, International Charter for the Conservation and Restoration of Monuments and Sites (The Venice Charter 1964), https://www.icomos.org/charters/venice_e.pdf [accessed: 25.04.2020].

ICOMOS, The Nara Document on Authenticity (1994), https://www.icomos.org/charters/nara-e.pdf [accessed: 25.04.2020].

International Law Association, Report of the Seventy-second Conference, Held in Toronto, 4-8 June 2006, https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.ilarc/ilarc0072&div=1&src=home [accessed: 25.04.2020].

Jiang Jie, Chinese Museum Demands Return of Horse Sculptures from Pennsylvania, “People’s Daily”, 13 January 2017, http://en.people.cn/n3/2017/0113/c90000-9166612.html [accessed: 25.04.2020].

Lenain G., 盧芹齋傳 [Biography of Loo Qinzhai], China Federation of Literary and Art Circles Press, Hong Kong 2015.

Li Langtao, 昭陵六骏”群雕赏析 [Appreciation of the Zhaolin Liujun’s Sculptural Art], “World of Antiquity” 2002, Vol. 4.

Li Puyuan, 中國藝術史概論 [Introduction to Chinese Art History], ChongWen Press, Wuhan 2015.

Li Xiaodong, 民国文物法规史评 [Historical Review of Cultural Relics Regulations of the Republic of China], Cultural Relics Publishing House, Beijing 2013.

Lowenthal D., Authenticity: Rock of Faith or Quicksand Quagmire?, “The Getty Conservation Institute Newsletter” 1999, Vol. 14(3), https://www.getty.edu/conservation/publications_ resources/newsletters/pdf/v14n3.pdf [accessed: 25.04.2020].

National Stolen Property Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2314–2315.

O’Keefe R. et al., Protection of Cultural Property: Military Manual, UNESCO, Sanremo 2016, https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000246633 [accessed: 01.05.2020].

Peng Jianpin, Re-Examination of the Theft of Zhaoling Liujun, “Relics and Museology” 2000, Vol. 3.

Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes. Title 42 – Judiciary and Judicial Procedure, Chapter 55: Limitation of Time, https://www.legis.state.pa.us/WU01/LI/LI/CT/HTM/42/00.055..HTM [accessed: 25.04.2020].

Shaffer G.C., Pollack M.A., How Hard and Soft Law Interact in International Regulatory Governance: Alternatives, Complements and Antagonists, in: S.J. Evenett, R.M. Stern (eds.),

Systemic Implications of Transatlantic Regulatory Cooperation and Competition, World Scientific Publishing, Singapore 2011.

Shelton D., Soft Law, in: D. Armstrong (ed.), Routledge Handbook of International Law, Routledge, London 2008.

Stamatoudi I., Alternative Dispute Resolution and Insights on Cases of Greek Cultural Property: The J.P. Getty Case, the Leon Levy and Shelby White Case, and the Parthenon Marbles Case, “International Journal of Cultural Property” 2016, Vol. 23(4), pp. 433-457.

Tașdelen A., The Return of Cultural Artefacts: Hard and Soft Law Approaches, Springer, Cham 2016.

Thürer D., Soft Law – Norms in the Twilight between Law and Politics, in: D. Thürer, International Law as Progress and Prospect, Dike Publishers, Zurich 2009.

U.S. Senate Report, 97-564 Implementing Legislation for the Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export, and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property, https://eca.state.gov/files/bureau/97-564.pdf [accessed: 25.04.2020].

UNESCO, International Code of Ethics for Dealers in Cultural Property, 1999, https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000121320 [accessed: 25.04.2020].

UNESCO, Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention, 8 July 2015, WHC.15/01.

Yuan Ting, A Study on the Influence of the Chinese Traditional Theory of “Harmony Between Nature and Men” to the Tomb Carving Art in Ancient China, “The Silk Road” 2011, Vol. 2.

Zhou Xiuqin, Emperor Taizong and His Six Horses, “Orientations” 2001, Vol. 32(2).

Zhou Xiuqin, The Process of The Two Steeds’ Loss, “Forest of Stone Steles Collection” 2002.

Zhou Xiuqin, Zhaoling: The Mausoleum of Emperor Tang Taizong, “Sino-Platonic Papers” 2009, No. 187.

中美再次签署关于限制进口中国文物的谅解备忘录 [China and the United States Once Again Signed a Memorandum of Understanding on Restrictions on the Import of Chinese Cultural Relics], 14 January 2019, http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2019-01/14/content_5357843.htm [accessed: 25.04.2020].

Information

Information: Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2020, 2/2020 (6), pp. 293 - 312

Article type: Original article

Titles:

Polish:

Soft Law in Promoting the Return of Zhaoling Two Steeds in Tang Dynasty

English:

Soft Law in Promoting the Return of Zhaoling Two Steeds in Tang Dynasty

Authors

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5387-0910

Li Weifang
School of International Law, East China University of Political Science and Law (ECUPL), 1575 Wanhangdu Rd, Changning District Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5387-0910 Orcid
All publications →

School of International Law, East China University of Political Science and Law (ECUPL), 1575 Wanhangdu Rd, Changning District Shanghai, People’s Republic of China

Published at: 2020

Article status: Open

Licence: CC BY-NC-ND  licence icon

Percentage share of authors:

Li Weifang (Author) - 100%

Article corrections:

-

Publication languages:

English