FAQ

Santander Art and Culture Law Review

Search results

simple search

search np. “cognitive architectures” AND 1993-200 NOT Urban
advanced search
ex. 1234-6789
ex. 10.4467/16890027AP.16.022.6009
ex. Uniwersytet Jagielloński

On the Borderline – Using National and International Legal Frameworks to Address the Traffic of Pre-Columbian Antiquities between Mexico and the United States

Publication date: 12.2021

Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2021, 2/2021 (7), pp. 51 - 76

https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSNR.21.018.15263

Authors

Claudia S. Quiñones Vilá
Amineddoleh & Associates LLC, 43 W 43rd St. #171, New York City, NY 10036, United States
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9238-6227 Orcid
All publications →

Pobierz pełny tekst

Download PDF PDF
Print print Cite cite Share share

Titles

On the Borderline – Using National and International Legal Frameworks to Address the Traffic of Pre-Columbian Antiquities between Mexico and the United States

Abstract

This article examines legal provisions and remedies for illicitly trafficked pre-Columbian antiquities, focusing on Mexico and the United States of America (USA), to determine gaps and areas for improvement. These two countries provide an interesting contrast, as they are contiguous neighbours but have different legal systems and approaches to the protection of cultural property. Nonetheless, Mexico and the USA have a history of fruitful cooperation in the recovery and return of pre-Columbian cultural objects under both domestic and international frameworks, such as bilateral agreements and cultural heritage conventions. In particular, as a country that accounts for nearly half of all global art market transactions, the USA is uniquely placed to act as a gatekeeper for pre-Columbian antiquities and serve as an example for the effective protection of foreign cultural property seized within its borders. However, while the examination of Mexico and the USA provides a useful case study, the illicit traffic of these objects should not be viewed in isolation or characterized as solely a regional problem. Globalization and the international nature of the art market require a more expansive view of the subject, while still taking countries’ legal and cultural specificities into account. A balanced and holistic approach will help increase the effectiveness of both national and international remedies; this will improve the legitimate market as a whole and curb illicit trafficking. By tackling the problem at both ends of the supply chain and increasing visibility, the possibilities of success shall rise.

Keywords

References

Download references
Amineddoleh L., The Role of Museums in the Trade of Black Market Cultural Heritage Property, “Art Antiquity and Law” 2013, Vol. 18(2).
Ayuso S., México y Francia firman una “declaración de intenciones” contra el tráfico de bienes cul­turales, “El País”, 1 July 2021, https://elpais.com/mexico/2021-07-01/mexico-y-fran­cia-firman-una-declaracion-de-intenciones-contra-el-trafico-de-bienes-culturales.html [accessed: 05.09.2021].
Barnet v. Ministry of Culture & Sports of the Hellenic Republic, No. 19-271 (2d Cir. 2020).
Bauer A., New Ways of Thinking about Cultural Property: A Critical Appraisal of the Antiquities Trade Debates, “Fordham International Law Journal” 2007, Vol. 31.
Becerril E., Mexico, in: J. Nafziger, T. Stoel, R. Kirkwood Paterson (eds.), Handbook on the Law of Cultural Heritage and International Trade, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham 2014.
Brodie N., Renfrew C., Looting and the World’s Archaeological Heritage: The Inadequate Re­sponse, “The Annual Review of Anthropology” 2005, Vol. 34.
Cascone, S., Infamous Antiquities Dealer Convicted of Smuggling and Forgery, “Artnet News”, 9 December 2015, https://news.artnet.com/art-world/antiquities-dealer-convict­ed-smuggling-forgery-389324 [accessed: 08.05.2021].
Constitución Política de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos [Political Constitution of the United Mexican States].
Convention on Cultural Property Implementation Act, Pub. L. 97-446, codified at 19 U.S.C. §2601-2613.
Convention on Stolen or Illegally Exported Cultural Objects, 24 June 1995, 34 ILM 1322.
Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Trans­fer of Ownership of Cultural Property, 14 November 1970, 823 UNTS 231.
Convention on the Protection of the Archaeological, Historical and Artistic Heritage of the American Nations, http://www.oas.org/en/sla/dil/inter_american_treaties_C-16_Con­vention_Protection_Archeological_Heritage.asp [accessed: 18.09.2021].
Daley J., Manhattan DA Launches First Antiquities Trafficking Unit, “Smithsonian Maga­zine”, 22 December 2017, https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/manhat­tan-da-launches-first-antiquities-trafficking-unit-180967607/ [accessed: 10.05.2021].
Directive (EU) 2018/843 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018 amending Directive (EU) 2015/849 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing, and amending Directives 2009/138/EC and 2013/36/EU, OJ L 156, 19.06.2018, p. 43.
Dorantes Díaz F.J., Derecho a la cultura en México. Su constitucionalización, sus características, alcances y limitaciones, “Alegatos”, September-December 2013, No. 85, https://www.corteidh.or.cr/tablas/r32205.pdf  [accessed: 10.09.2021].
Duhne E., Pérez J.P., Chagoya S., Mexico, in: B. Boesch (ed.), The Art Collecting Legal Hand­book, Thomson Reuters, London 2013.
Fitz Gibbon K., No More “Good Provenance,” “Cultural Property News”, 29 March 2013, https://culturalpropertynews.org/no-more-good-provenance/ [accessed: 07.05.2021].
Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, Pub. L. No. 94-583 (1976) codified at 28 U.S.C. §1602-1611.
French Auctioneer Defies Mexico with Sale of Pre-Columbian Artifacts, “Reuters”, 18 Septem­ber 2019, https://www.reuters.com/article/us-mexico-france-art-idUSKBN1W326D [accessed: 11.05.2021].
Gerstenblith P., Implementation of the 1970 UNESCO Convention by the United States and Oth­er Market Nations, in: J. Anderson, H. Geismar (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Cultur­al Property, Routledge, Oxon–New York 2017.
Gobierno de México, Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia, INAH estrena nuevo Sis­tema de registro de bienes culturales, “Cultura”, 11 March 2011, https://www.inah.gob.mx/boletines/786-inah-estrena-nuevo-sistema-de-registro-de-bienes-culturales [ac­cessed: 11.05.2021].
Honan W., Art for Whose Sake? Trading in Antiquities; Rare Pre-Columbian Relics, at Any Cost, “The New York Times”, 31 July 1995, https://www.nytimes.com/1995/07/31/us/art-for-whose-sake-trading-in-antiquities-rare-pre-columbian-relics-at-any-cost.html [accessed: 11.05.2021].
Interpol, INTERPOL Launches App to Better Protect Cultural Heritage, “Interpol News”, 6 May 2021, https://www.interpol.int/en/News-and-Events/News/2021/INTER­POL-launches-app-to-better-protect-cultural-heritage  [accessed: 11.05.2021].
Landsberg T., Looted Art: Mexico, Panama Protest Munich House Auction, “DW”, 21 September 2021, https://www.dw.com/en/looted-art-mexico-panama-protest-munich-house-auction/a-59248908 [accessed: 27.09.2021]
Levine A., The Need for Uniform Legal Protection Against Cultural Property Theft: A Final Cry for the 1995 UNIDROIT Convention, “Brooklyn Journal of International Law” 2011, Vol. 36.
Ley de Preservación y Promoción de la Cultura de Yucatán [Law for the Preservation and Promotion of the Culture of Yucatán], 8 August 2005, http://www.archivogeneral.yucatan.gob.mx/files-content/general/14d4b9111d2efa7a84d9f0a674c9ea2b.pdf [accessed: 18.09.2021].
Ley Federal para la Prevención e Identificación de Operaciones con Recursos de Proceden­cia Ilícita [Federal Law to Prevent and Identify Illegal Resources], 17 October 2012.
Ley Federal sobre Monumentos y Zonas Arqueológicos, Artísticos, e Históricos [Cultural Protection Act], 6 May 1972, 312 D.O. 16 (Mex.).
Manacorda S., Criminal Law Protection of Cultural Heritage: An International Perspective, in: S. Manacorda, D. Chappell (eds.), Crime in the Art and Antiquities World: Illegal Traf­ficking in Cultural Property, Springer Verlag, New York 2011.
McAndrew C., The Art Market 2021: An Art Basel & UBS Report, “Art Basel & UBS”, 16 March 2021, https://d2u3kfwd92fzu7.cloudfront.net/The_Art_Market_2021.pdf [accessed: 11.05.2021].
McGreevy N., How a New Law Will Impact the U.S. Antiquities Trade, “Smithsonian Maga­zine”, 11 January 2021, https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/congress-in­crease-regulations-antiquities-trade-us-180976712/ [accessed: 11.05.2021].
Mexico. Report on the Implementation on [sic] the 1970 Convention on the Means of Prohibit­ing and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property, UNESCO, July 2015, http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/CLT/pdf/MEXICO_REPORT.pdf [accessed: 05.09.2021].
The Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing (Amendment) Regulations 2019 (SI 2019/1511).
Morrow J.E., The National Stolen Property Act and the Return of Stolen Cultural Property to its Rightful Foreign Owners, “Boston College International and Comparative Law Review” 2007, Vol. 30.
Nafziger J.A.R., Seizure and Forfeiture of Cultural Property by the United States, “Jeffrey S. Moo­rad Sports Law Journal” 1998, Vol. 5.
National Stolen Property Act, 18 U.S.C. §2314 et seq. (2001).
Noce V., Pre-Columbian Auction in Paris Goes Ahead in Face of Protest from Guatemala and Mex­ico, “The Art Newspaper”, 19 September 2019, https://www.theartnewspaper.com/news/Guatemala  [accessed: 11.05.2021].
Phelps R.D., Protecting North America’s Past: The Current (and Ineffective) Laws Preventing the Illicit Trade of Mexican Pre-Columbian Antiquities and How We Can Improve Them, “Texas Law Review” 2016, Vol. 94.
Porterfield C., Smugglers Are Using Coronavirus Lockdowns To Loot Artifacts, “Forbes”, 30 April 2020, https://www.forbes.com/sites/carlieporterfield/2020/04/30/smugglers-are-using-coronavirus-lockdowns-to-loot-artifacts/?sh=58e7ae4436bf [accessed: 11.05.2021].
Potter L.S., Zagaris B., Toward a Common U.S.-Mexican Cultural Heritage: The Need for a Re­gional Americas Initiative in the Recovery and Return of Stolen Cultural Property, “Global Business and Development Law Journal” 1992, Vol. 5(2).
The Prosecutor v. Ahmad Al Faqi Al Mahdi (Case No. ICC-01/12-01/15).
Prott L.V., UNESCO and UNIDROIT: A Partnership against Trafficking in Cultural Objects, “Uni­form Law Review” 1996, Vol. 1(1).
Reglamento para la Preservación de las Zonas de Patrimonio Cultural del Municipio de Mérida [Regulations for the Preservation of Cultural Heritage Zones in the Munici­pality of Merida], 4 July 2008, https://isla.merida.gob.mx/serviciosinternet/normativ­idad/files/Reglamentos/PRESERV_ZONAS_PATR.pdf [accessed: 18.09.2021].
Regulation of Importation of Pre-Columbian Monumental or Architectural Sculpture or Mu­rals (Pre-Columbian) Act. Pub. L. No. 92-587 (1972), codified at 19 U.S.C. §2091-2095.
Sánchez Cordero J., The Evolving Landscape of Mexican Cultural Heritage, in: The Preservation of Cultural Heritage. The Combat against Illicit Trafficking of Cultural Property, Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico 1997.
Sánchez Cordero J., The Protection of Cultural Heritage: A Mexican Perspective, “Uniform Law Review” 2003, Vol. 8(1-2).
Sargent M. et al., Tracking and Disrupting the Illicit Antiquities Trade with Open-Source Data, RAND Corporation, 2020, https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_ reports/RR2700/RR2706/RAND_RR2706.pdf [accessed: 10.05.2021].
Schneider M., The 1995 UNIDROIT Convention: An Indispensable Complement to the 1970 UNESCO Convention and an Inspiration for the 2014/60/EU Directive, “Santander Art and Culture Law Review” 2016, Vol. 2(2).
Sharpe E., Online Antiquities Smugglers Are Taking Advantage of the Coronavirus Crisis, “The Art Newspaper”, 29 April 2020, https://www.theartnewspaper.com/news/increase-in-on­line-trade-of-illicit-antiquities-during-the-coronavirus-crisis [accessed: 11.05.2021].
Solomon T., Mexican Government Attempts to Halt German Auction of Pre-Columbian Arti­facts, “ARTnews”, 20 September 2021, https://www.artnews.com/art-news/news/mexican-government-halt-sale-pre-columbian-artifacts-germany-1234604280/ [accessed: 28.09.2021].
Treaty of Cooperation Providing for the Recovery and Return of Stolen Archaeological, His­torical, and Cultural Properties, 22 U.S.T. 494, T.I.A.S. No. 7088 (17 July 1970).
US Immigrations and Customs Enforcement, HSI Arizona Returns Hundreds of Pre-Colum­bian Artifacts to Mexico, “ICE Newsroom”, 9 March 2021, https://www.ice.gov/news/releases/hsi-arizona-returns-hundreds-pre-columbian-artifacts-mexico [accessed: 11.05.2021].
US Senate, Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, Staff Report, The Art Industry and U.S. Policies that Undermine Sanctions, 27 July 2020, https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2020-07-29%20PSI%20Staff%20Report%20-%20The%20Art%20 Industry%20and%20U.S.%20Policies%20that%20Undermine%20Sanctions.pdf [accessed: 11.05.2021].
US v. Erdal Dere and Faisal Khan, Case No. 20-cr-501 (SDNY 2020).
US v. Hollinshead, 495 F.2d 1154 (9th Cir. 1974).
US v. McClain, 545 F.2d 988 (1977) and 593 F.2d 658 (1979).
Valiant S., Why Was Mexico So Determined to Stop a Sale of Ancient Artefacts in Paris?, “Apollo Magazine”, 23 March 2021, https://www.apollo-magazine.com/mexico-ancient-arte­facts-heritage-christies/  [accessed: 11.05.2021 and 27.09.2021].
Yates D., Illicit Cultural Property from Latin America: Looting, Trafficking, and Sale, in: F. Des­marais (ed.), Countering Illicit Traffic in Cultural Goods: The Global Challenge of Protecting the World’s Heritage, ICOM, Paris 2015.
 

Information

Information: Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2021, 2/2021 (7), pp. 51 - 76

Article type: Original article

Titles:

Polish:

On the Borderline – Using National and International Legal Frameworks to Address the Traffic of Pre-Columbian Antiquities between Mexico and the United States

English:

On the Borderline – Using National and International Legal Frameworks to Address the Traffic of Pre-Columbian Antiquities between Mexico and the United States

Authors

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9238-6227

Claudia S. Quiñones Vilá
Amineddoleh & Associates LLC, 43 W 43rd St. #171, New York City, NY 10036, United States
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9238-6227 Orcid
All publications →

Amineddoleh & Associates LLC, 43 W 43rd St. #171, New York City, NY 10036, United States

Published at: 12.2021

Article status: Open

Licence: CC BY-NC-ND licence icon

Percentage share of authors:

Claudia S. Quiñones Vilá (Author) - 100%

Article corrections:

-

Publication languages:

English

View count: 910

Number of downloads: 640

<p> On the Borderline – Using National and International Legal Frameworks to Address the Traffic of Pre-Columbian Antiquities between Mexico and the United States</p>
Download PDF Download xml