Making the Case for the Restitution of Illicitly Acquired Cultural Objects under the Rules of Jus Cogens
cytuj
pobierz pliki
RIS BIB ENDNOTEChoose format
RIS BIB ENDNOTEMaking the Case for the Restitution of Illicitly Acquired Cultural Objects under the Rules of Jus Cogens
Publication date: 13.12.2023
Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2023, 2/2023 (9), pp. 143 - 166
https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSNR.23.026.18646Authors
Making the Case for the Restitution of Illicitly Acquired Cultural Objects under the Rules of Jus Cogens
Over the years, our perspective on cultural heritage has undergone changes. The field has become more diverse, requiring solution-focused approaches to address the underlying problems associated with cultural heritage. One significant challenge is the issue of restitution, which is considered a major failure of international cultural heritage law. How can international cultural heritage law completely heal historical wounds instead of merely offering empty hopes to those who have suffered? Simply acknowledging past wrongs by offending states is insufficient, and it does not align with the fundamental legal principle that where there is a wrong, there should be a remedy (ubi jus ibi remedium). Despite the considerable growth in the jurisprudence of international cultural heritage law, there remains a pressing need to consolidate the legal framework to facilitate the restitution of stolen or looted cultural objects. This article argues that the prohibition of plunder and pillage of cultural property constitutes a jus cogens rule of international law. Its violation therefore gives rise to an unconditional obligation to restitute such property.
“Act of Plunder”: Egyptians Want the Rosetta Stone Back, “Aljazeera”, 30 November 2022, https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/11/30/after-220-years-egypt-demands-the-return-of-the-rosetta-stone [accessed: 17.09.2023]
Adewumi A., Benin Objects: Return of Stolen Objects or Restitution of Objects of Cultural Value? “International Review of Law and Jurisprudence” 2019, Vol. 1(2).
Adewumi A., Curbing the Illicit Traffic in African Antiquities through Legislation, “Art, Antiquity and Law” 2016, Vol. 21(1).
Adewumi A., The Development of Partnership between UNESCO, Governmental and Non-Governmental Organisations in the Fight against Illicit Trafficking of Cultural Property, “Nigerian Bar Journal” 2017, Vol. 10.
Adewumi A., Utilitarianism: Merging the Dichotomy between Nationalist and Internationalist Conception of Cultural Property, “African Journal of Legal Studies” 2022, Vol. 14(4).
Adewumi A., War Time Pains, All Time Pains: Spoilage of Cultural Property in Mali, “Art, Antiquity and Law” 2013, Vol. 18(4).
Bianchi A., Human Rights and the Magic of Jus Cogens, “European Journal of International Law” 2008, Vol. 19(3).
Blake J., On Defining the Cultural Heritage, “The International and Comparative Law Quarterly” 2000, Vol. 49(1).
Charlesworth H., Chinkin C., The Gender of Jus Cogens, “Human Rights Quarterly” 1993, Vol. 15(1).
Conklin W.E., The Peremptory Norms of the International Community, “European Journal of International Law” 2012, Vol. 23(3).
Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict, 14 May 1954, 249 UNTS 240.
Convention for the Protection of the Architectural Heritage of Europe, 3 October 1985, ETS No. 121.
Cornu M., Renold M.-A., New Developments in the Restitution of Cultural Property: Alternative Means of Dispute Resolution, “International Journal of Cultural Property” 2010, Vol. 17(1).
da Costa K.L., The Demand for Restitution of Cultural Heritage through Relations between Africa and Europe, in: R. Christofoletti, M.L. Botelho (eds.), International Relations and Heritage: Patchwork in Times of Plurality, Springer, Cham 2021.
Daniels B.I., Is the Destruction of Cultural Property a War Crime? “Apollo Magazine”, 28 November 2016, https://www.apollo-magazine.com/is-the-destruction-of-cultural-property-a-war-crime/ [accessed: 17.09.2023].
Davis P.W., Restitution: Concept and Terms – Introduction and Historical Background, “Hastings Law Journal” 1968, Vol. 19(4).
Dubuis A., Timbuktu Destroyer Committed a War Crime, “The Times”, 26 March 2016.
Egyptians Demand the British Museum Return the Rosetta Stone, “Africa News”, 30 November 2022, https://www.africanews.com/2022/11/30/egyptians-demand-the-british-museum-return-the-rosetta-stone [accessed: 17.09.2023].
Fabris A.L., Military Necessity under the 1954 Hague Convention, “Santander Art and Culture Law Review” 2015, Vol. 2(1).
Fitz Gibbon K., International Criminal Court: Cultural Heritage & Genocide, “Cultural Property News”, 1 August 2021.
Ford C.A., Adjudicating Jus Cogens, “Wisconsin International Law Journal” 1995, Vol. 13(1). Francioni F., Vrdoljak A.F. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Cultural Heritage Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2020.
Frigo M., Cultural Property v. Cultural Heritage: A “Battle of Concepts” in International Law? “International Review of the Red Cross” 2004, Vol. 86.
Gerecka-Żołyńska A., Penalizing the Forgery of a Work of Art in the Polish Legal System: Notes de lege lata and Postulates de lege ferenda, “Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny” 2022, Vol. 84(2).
Glass A., Return to Sender: On the Politics of Cultural Property and the Proper Address of Art, “Journal of Material Culture” 2004, Vol. 9(2).
Groizard J.L., Santana-Gallego M., The Destruction of Cultural Heritage and International Tourism: The Case of the Arab Countries, “Journal of Cultural Heritage” 2018, Vol. 33.
Harris G., What Has Happened to France’s Grand Plan to Return Africa’s Heritage? “The Art Newspaper”, 1 June 2022.
Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, Domingues v. United States, Case No. 12.285, Report No. 62/02, 22 October 2002.
International Committee of the Red Cross, Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict, International Committee of the Red Cross, Geneva 2002.
International Council of Museums, Study on the Principles, Conditions and Means for the Restitution or Return of Cultural Property in View of Reconstituting Dispersed Heritages, August 1977, UNESCO Doc. CC-78/CONF.609/3, Annex I.
International Criminal Court, Policy on Cultural Heritage, June 2021, https://www.icc-cpi.int/sites/default/files/itemsDocuments/20210614-otp-policy-cultural-heritage-eng.pdf [accessed: 17.09.2023].
Kempner R., The Nuremberg Trials as Sources of Recent German Political and Historical Materials, “American Political Science Review” 1950, Vol. 44(2).
Kouhossounon B., The Restitution of Cultural Property at the Heart of Cultural Diplomacy, “Politické vedy” 2019, Vol. 22(2).
Labadie C., Decolonizing Collections: A Legal Perspective on the Restitution of Cultural Artifacts, “ICOFOM Study Series” 2021, Vol. 49(2).
Lambert S., Rockwell C. (eds.), Protecting Cultural Heritage in Times of Conflict, ICCROM, Rome 2012.
Linderfalk U., Understanding Jus Cogens in International Law and International Legal Discourse, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham 2020.
Loureiro S.M.C. et al., Culture, Heritage Looting, and Tourism: A Text Mining Review Approach, “Frontiers in Psychology” 2022, Vol. 13.
McKeown T., The Nuremberg Trial: Procedural Due Process at the International Military Tribunal, “Victoria University of Wellington Law Review” 2014, Vol. 45(1).
McKinnon H.R., Natural Law and Positive Law, “Notre Dame Law Review” 1948, Vol. 23(2).
Menkel-Meadow C., Restorative Justice: What Is It and Does It Work?, “Annual Review of Law and Social Sciences” 2007, Vol. 3.
Merryman J., Two Ways of Thinking about Cultural Property, “American Journal of International Law” 1986, Vol. 80(4).
Nováček K. et al., The Intentional Destruction of Cultural Heritage in Iraq as a Violation of Human Rights, Submission for the United Nations Special Rapporteur in the field of cultural rights by RASHID International e.V., 2016.
O’Keefe R., Protection of Cultural Property under International Criminal Law, “Melbourne Journal of International Law” 2010, Vol. 11.
O’Keefe R., The Meaning of “Cultural Property” under 1954 Hague Convention, “Netherlands International Law Review” 1999, Vol. 46.
O’Keefe R., The Protection of Cultural Property in Armed Conflict, “Amicus Curiae” 2007, Vol. 71.
Pinton S., The ICC Judgement in Al Mahdi: Heritage Communities and Restorative Justice in the International Criminal Protection of Cultural Heritage, “Seattle Journal for Social Justice” 2020, Vol. 19(1).
Ramaj E., Binding International Norms, Jus Cogens, “European Journal of Sustainable Development” 2016, Vol. 5(3).
Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.
Sarr F., Savoy B., The Restitution of African Cultural Heritage. Toward a New Relational Ethics, November 2018, https://www.about-africa.de/images/sonstiges/2018/sarr_savoy_en.pdf [accessed: 17.09.2023].
Scovazzi T., Repatriation and Restitution of Cultural Property: Relevant Rules of International Law, in: C. Smith (ed.), Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology, Springer, New York 2014.
Second Protocol to the Hague Convention of 1954 for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict, 26 March 1999, 2253 UNTS 172.
Siehr K., The UNIDROIT Draft Convention on the International Protection of Cultural Property, “International Journal of Cultural Property” 1992, Vol. 1(2).
Soirila P., Indeterminacy in the Cultural Property Restitution Debate, “International Journal of Cultural Policy” 2022, Vol. 28(1).
Stamatoudi I., Cultural Property Law and Restitution: A Commentary to International Conventions and European Union Law, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham 2011.
Tee V.-Y., In the Shadow of the Rosetta Stone: The Singapore Stone, Repatriation and Decolonisation, “AGON: Rivista Internazionale di Studi Culturali, Linguistici e Letterari” 2021, Vol. 29.
Trial Chamber I, Prosecutor v. Jokić, Case No. IT-01-42/1-S, Judgment of 18 March 2004.
Trial Chamber II, Prosecutor v. Strugar, Case No. IT-01-42-T, Judgment of 31 January 2005.
Trial Chamber III, Prosecutor v. Kordic, Case No. IT-95-14/2-T, Judgment of 26 February 2001.
Trial Chamber VIII, The Prosecutor v. Al Mahdi, Case No. ICC-01/12-01/15, Judgment of 27
September 2016.
UNESCO Convention for the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage, 16 November 1972, 1037 UNTS 151.
UNESCO Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property, 14 November 1970, 823 UNTS 231.
UNESCO Declaration concerning the Intentional Destruction of Cultural Heritage, 17 October 2003, https://en.unesco.org/about-us/legal-affairs/unesco-declaration-concerning-intentional-destruction-cultural-heritage [accessed: 17.09.2023].
UNIDROIT Convention on Stolen or Illegally Exported Cultural Objects, 24 June 1995, 2421 UNTS 457.
Vadi V., Jus Cogens in International Investment Law and Arbitration, in: M. den Heijer, H. van der Wilt (eds.), Netherlands Yearbook of International Law, T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague 2015.
van Beurden S., La restitution du patrimoine africain doit être un point de départ, “Le Monde”, 30 November 2018, https://www.lemonde.fr/idees/article/2018/11/30/la-restitution-doit-etre-un-point-de-depart_5391051_3232.html [accessed: 19.09.2023].
Verdross A., Jus Dispositivum and Jus Cogens in International Law, “American Journal of International Law” 1966, Vol. 60(1).
Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, 23 May 1969, 1155 UNTS 331.
von Oswald M., The “Restitution Report”: First Reactions in Academia, Museums, and Politics, 18 December 2018.
von Schorlemer S., UNESCO and the Challenge of Preserving the Digital Cultural Heritage, “Santander Art and Culture Law Review” 2020, Vol. 6(2).
Wayne S., Dynamics of International Norm Change: Rules Against Wartime Plunder, “European Journal of International Relations” 2008, Vol. 1.
Weatherall T., The Formal Source of Peremptory Norms, in: T. Weatherall, Jus Cogens: International Law and Social Contract, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2015.
Welch J.R., IPinCH Project, Cultural Heritage: What Is It? Why Is It Important?, February 2014.
Williams S., The International and National Protection of Movable Cultural Property: A Comparative Study, Oceana Publications, Dobbs Ferry, NY 1978.
Zeidler K., Restitution of Cultural Property: Hard Case, Theory of Argumentation and Philosophy of Law, Gdańsk University Press; Wolters Kluwer, Gdańsk–Warsaw 2016.
Zhang Y., Customary International Law and the Rule against Taking Cultural Property as Spoils of War, “Chinese Journal of International Law” 2018, Vol. 17(4).
Information: Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2023, 2/2023 (9), pp. 143 - 166
Article type: Original article
Titles:
Making the Case for the Restitution of Illicitly Acquired Cultural Objects under the Rules of Jus Cogens
Making the Case for the Restitution of Illicitly Acquired Cultural Objects under the Rules of Jus Cogens
University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria
University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria
Published at: 13.12.2023
Article status: Open
Licence: CC BY
Percentage share of authors:
Article corrections:
-Publication languages:
EnglishView count: 732
Number of downloads: 532