American Alliance of Museums, Developing a Mission Statement, 2012, http://www.aam-us.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/developing-a-mission-statement-final.pdf [accessed: 10.10.2022].

American Alliance of Museums, Ethics, Standards, and Professional Practices, https://www.aam-us.org/programs/ethics-standards-and-professional-practices/collections-management-policy/ [accessed: 01.10.2022].

Amineddoleh L., The Role of Museums in the Trade of Black Market Cultural Heritage Property, “Art Antiquity and Law” 2013, Vol. 18(3).

Arts Council England, Restitution and Repatriation: A Practical Guide for Museums in England, 5 August 2022, https://www.artscouncil.org.uk/supporting-arts-museums-and-libraries/supporting-collections-and-cultural-property/restitution-and [accessed: 12.10.2022].

Atkinson R., Arts Council England Appoints Firm to Produce Repatriation Guidance, Museums Association, 18 March 2020, https://www.museumsassociation.org/museums-journal/news/2020/03/18032020-arts-council-england-appoints-firm-to-produce-repatriation-guidance/ [accessed: 10.09.2022].

Avrami E., Mason R., de la Torre M., Report on Research, in: E. Avrami et al. (eds.), Values and Heritage Conservation: Research Report, Getty Conservation Institute, Los Angeles 2000.

Ballarin M., Balletti C., Vernier P., Replicas in Cultural Heritage: 3D Printing and the Museum Experience, “International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing & Spatial Information Sciences” 2018, Vol. 42(2).

Balletti C., Ballarin M., Guerra F., 3D Printing: State of the Art and Future Perspectives, “Journal of Cultural Heritage” 2017, Vol. 26.

Barkan E., Making Amends: A New International Morality?, in: L.V. Prott (ed.), Witnesses to History: A Compendium of Documents and Writings on the Return of Cultural Objects, UNESCO Publishing, Paris 2009.

Bienkowski P., A Critique of Museum Restitution and Repatriation Practices, in: C. McCarthy (ed.), The International Handbooks of Museum Studies: Museum Practice, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester 2015.

British Museum Refuses Access to the Athens Acropolis Parthenon Marbles, “Tornos News”,

23 March 2022, https://www.tornosnews.gr/en/greek-news/culture/46754-british-museum-refuses-access-to-the-athens-acropolis-parthenon-marbles.html?print [accessed: 10.10.2022].

British Museum to Face Court after Rejecting Request for 3D Scan of Parthenon Marbles, “Neos Kosmos”, 23 March 2022, https://neoskosmos.com/en/2022/03/23/news/greece/british-museum-to-face-court-after-rejecting-request-for-3d-scan-of-parthenon-marbles/ [accessed: 10.10.2022].

British Museum, Due Diligence Procedures for Works of Art and Cultural Objects on Loan from Abroad to Temporary Exhibitions, 2008, https://www.britishmuseum.org/sites/default/files/2019-10/Due-diligence-procedures-08-04-03.pdf [accessed: 01.10.2022].

Brown K., The Netherlands Should Return Cultural Objects Looted From Former Colonies, a New Report Says – and Major Museums Agree, “Artnet News”, 9 October 2020, https://news.artnet.com/art-world/netherlands-report-cultural-objects-restitution-1914398 [accessed: 10.09.2022].

Cascone S., The Dutch Government Just Promised to Return Any Stolen Colonial-Era Objects in Its Collections Back to Their Countries of Origin, “Artnet News”, 4 February 2021, https://news.artnet.com/art-world/netherlands-restitution-guidelines-1941734 [accessed: 10.09.2022].

Collections Trust, Collections Management Policies, 2011, https://collectionstrust.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Collections-Management-Policies.pdf [accessed: 01.10.2022].

Council Directive 93/7/EEC of 15 March 1993 on the return of cultural objects unlawfully removed from the territory of a Member State, OJ L 74, 27.03.1993, p. 74.

Deutscher Museums Bund, Leitfaden zum Umgang mit Sammlungsgut aus kolonialen Kontexten, 2021, https://www.museumsbund.de/publikationen/leitfaden-zum-umgang-mit-sammlungsgut-aus-kolonialen-kontexten/ [accessed: 10.09.2022].

Directive 2014/60/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on the return of cultural objects unlawfully removed from the territory of a Member State and amending Regulation (EU) No. 1024/2012 (Recast), OJ L 159, 28.05.2014, p. 1.

Elias C., Whose Digital Heritage? Contemporary Art, 3D Printing and the Limits of Cultural Property, “Third Text” 2019, Vol. 33(6).

Fitz Gibbon K., Arts Council England: Guidelines for Museum Repatriation, “Cultural Property News”, 8 April 2020, https://culturalpropertynews.org/arts-council-england-guidelines-for-museum-repatriation-policy/ [accessed: 10.09.2022].

Gabriel M., Dahl J. (eds.), Utimut: Past Heritage – Future Partnerships. Discussions on Repatriation in the 21st Century, International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs and the Greenland National Museum and Archives, Copenhagen 2008, https://www.iwgia.org/images/publications/0028_Utimut_heritage.pdf [accessed: 10.09.2022].

Getty Research Institute, Collecting and Provenance Research, https://www.getty.edu/research/tools/provenance/ [accessed: 26.09.2022].

Getty Research Institute, Getty Provenance Index, https://www.getty.edu/research/tools/provenance/search.html [accessed: 28.09.2022].

Gill D., Context Matters: Learning from the Herm. The Need for More Rigorous Due Diligence Searches, “Journal of Art Crime” 2014, Vol. 12.

Harris G., New Guidelines for UK Museums Will Kickstart Nation’s Long-Overdue Restitution Debate, “The Art Newspaper”, 20 March 2020, https://www.theartnewspaper.com/2020/03/20/new-guidelines-for-uk-museums-will-kickstart-nations-long-overdue-restitution-debate [accessed: 10.09.2022].

Herman A., One Year after the Sarr-Savoy Report, France Has Lost Its Momentum in the Restitution Debate, “The Art Newspaper”, 12 November 2019, https://www.theartnewspaper.com/2019/11/12/one-year-after-the-sarr-savoy-report-france-has-lost-its-momentum-in-the-restitution-debate [accessed: 10.09.2022].

Hickley C., Netherlands Takes Lead in Europe’s Efforts to Return Artefacts to Former Colonies, “The Art Newspaper”, 4 February 2021, https://www.theartnewspaper.com/2021/02/04/netherlands-takes-lead-in-europes-efforts-to-return-artefacts-to-former-colonies [accessed: 10.09.2022].

Hollinger E. et al., Tlingit-Smithsonian Collaborations with 3D Digitization of Cultural Objects, “Museum Anthropology Review” 2013, Vol. 7(1-2).

ICOM International Committee for University Museums and Collections, Guidance for Restitution and Return of Items from University Museums and Collections, December 2021, http://umac.icom.museum/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/UMAC-Guidance-Restitution-2022.pdf [accessed: 10.10.2022].

ICOM International Observatory on Illicit Traffic in Cultural Goods, Due Diligence / Good Faith, https://www.obs-traffic.museum/due-diligence-good-faith [accessed: 10.09.2022].

ICOM International Observatory on Illicit Traffic in Cultural Goods, How to Fight It?, https://www.obs-traffic.museum/how-fight-it [accessed: 10.09.2022].

Intergovernmental Committee for Promoting the Return of Cultural Property to its Countries of Origin or its Restitution in case of Illicit Appropriation, Report on the Role of Museums in the Fight Against Illicit Trafficking of Cultural Property and the Facilitation of its Return and Restitution, April 2022, UNESCO Doc. ICPRCP/22/23.COM/11.

International Council of Museums, ICOM Code of Ethics for Museums, 2017, https://icom.museum/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/ICOM-code-En-web.pdf accessed: 27.02.2023].

Interpol, Assessing Crimes Against Cultural Property 2020: Survey of Interpol Member Countries, September 2021.

Isaac G., Perclusive Alliances: Digital 3-D, Museums, and the Reconciling of Culturally Diverse Knowledges, “Current Anthropology” 2015, Vol. 56(S12).

Jenkins S., Give the Parthenon Marbles Back to Greece – Tech Advances Mean There Are No More Excuses, “The Guardian”, 20 November 2021, https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/nov/20/parthenon-marbles-greece-british-museum [accessed: 10.09.2022].

Knowles T., Robot “with Human Touch” Could Carve Replica Elgin Marbles, “The Times”, 14 February 2022.

Kowalski W., “Restitution”: Art Treasures and War, in: L.V. Prott (ed.), Witnesses to History: A Compendium of Documents and Writings on the Return of Cultural Objects, UNESCO Publishing, Paris 2009.

Legget J., Restitution and Repatriation: Guidelines for Good Practice, Museums & Galleries Commission, London 2000.

Matassa F., Museum Collections Management: A Handbook, Facet Publishing, London 2011. Matthes E.H., Repatriation and the Radical Redistribution of Art, “Ergo” 2017, Vol. 4(32).

McGlone P., Human Bones, Stolen Art: Smithsonian Tackles Its “Problem” Collections, “The Washington Post”, 27 July 2022, https://www.washingtonpost.com/arts-entertainment/2022/07/27/smithsonian-collection-policy-update/ [accessed: 12.10.2022].

Metropolitan Museum of Art, Provenance Research Project, https://www.metmuseum.org/about-the-met/policies-and-documents/provenance-research-project [accessed: 26.09.2022].

Minneapolis Institute of Art, Provenance Research at Mia, https://collections.artsmia.org/info/provenance-research [accessed: 10.09.2022].

Museum of London, Collections Development Policy, December 2018, https://www.museumoflondon.org.uk/application/files/7115/5240/9439/Collections_Development_Policy_2018_final_formatted_v1.0_EXTERNAL.pdf [accessed: 01.09.2022]

Museum of Modern Art, Provenance Research Project, https://www.moma.org/collection/provenance/ [accessed: 26.09.2022].

National Portrait Gallery, Collections Due Diligence Policy, 2018, https://www.npg.org.uk/about/corporate/gallery-policies/due-diligence-policy [accessed: 10.09.2022].

Neumüller M. et al., 3D Printing for Cultural Heritage: Preservation, Accessibility, Research and Education, in: M. Ioannides, E. Quak (eds.), 3D Research Challenges in Cultural Heritage, Springer-Verlag, Berlin–Heidelberg 2014.

Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe, Guidebook on Standards for Drafting Cultural Heritage Management Plans, July 2020.

Peru-Yale Center for the Study of Machu Picchu and Inca Culture Opens, “Yale News”, 6 October 2011, https://news.yale.edu/2011/10/06/peru-yale-center-study-machu-picchu-and-inca-culture-opens [accessed: 10.09.2022].

Peru-Yale Partnership for the Future of Machu Picchu Artifacts, “Yale News”, 4 June 2015, https://news.yale.edu/2015/06/04/peru-yale-partnership-future-machu-picchu-artifacts [accessed: 28.09.2022].

Princeton University Art Museum, Provenance Research, https://artmuseum.princeton.edu/collections/provenance-research [accessed: 26.09.2022].

Prott L.V., Note on Terminology, in: L.V. Prott (ed.), Witnesses to History: A Compendium of Documents and Writings on the Return of Cultural Objects, UNESCO Publishing, Paris 2009.

Reed V., Due Diligence, Provenance Research, and the Acquisition Process at the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, “DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law” 2013, Vol. 23(2).

Restitution Belgium, Ethical Principles for the Management and Restitution of Colonial Collections in Belgium, June 2021, https://restitutionbelgium.be/en/report [accessed: 10.09.2022].

Roussos K., Stamatoudi I., Management Issues for CH Institutions, in: I. Stamatoudi (ed.), Research Handbook on Intellectual Property and Cultural Heritage, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham 2022.

Ruston S., On the Impact of Arts Council England’s New Restitution Guidelines, Center for Art Law, 30 July 2021, https://itsartlaw.org/2021/07/30/on-the-impact-of-arts-council-englands-new-restitution-guidelines/ [accessed: 10.09.2022].

Sarr F., Savoy B., The Restitution of African Cultural Heritage. Toward a New Relational Ethics, November 2018, https://www.about-africa.de/images/sonstiges/2018/sarr_savoy_en.pdf [accessed: 02.03.2023].

Savoy-Sarr Report on African Art Restitution: A Summary, “Cultural Property News”, 30 January 2019, https://culturalpropertynews.org/the-savoy-sarr-report-for-president-macron-a-summary/ [accessed: 10.09.2022].

Scopigno R. et al., Digital Fabrication Techniques for Cultural Heritage: A Survey, “Computer Graphics Forum” 2017, Vol. 36.

Smithsonian Institution, Collections Search Center, https://collections.si.edu/search/ [accessed: 28.09.2022].

Stamatoudi I., Alternative Dispute Resolution and Insights on Cases of Greek Cultural Property: The J.P. Getty Case, the Leon Levy and Shelby White Case, and the Parthenon Marbles Case, “International Journal of Cultural Property” 2016, Vol. 23.

Stamatoudi I., Cultural Property Law and Restitution: A Commentary to International Conventions and European Union Law, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham 2011.

Stamatoudi I., Return of Cultural Treasures to Their Countries of Origin: Principle or Trend in Cultural Property Law?, in: P. Pazartzis et al. (eds.), Reconceptualising the Rule of Law in Global Governance, Resources, Investment and Trade, Bloomsbury Publishing, Oxford 2016.

Subsidiary Committee of the Meeting of States Parties to the UNESCO Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property (UNESCO, Paris, 1970), Due Diligence, April 2019, UNESCO Doc. C70/19/7.SC/8a.

Subsidiary Committee of the Meeting of States Parties to the UNESCO Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property (UNESCO, Paris, 1970), Links between the Concepts of Due Diligence and Provenance, 28 September 2020, UNESCO Doc. C70/20/8.SC/9.

The Institute for Digital Archaeology, Our Purpose, http://digitalarchaeology.org.uk/our-purpose [accessed: 12.10.2022].

The University of Edinburgh Collections, Collections Management Policy, June 2015, https://www.ed.ac.uk/files/atoms/files/uc_collections_management_policy_final_approved_22_june_2015-_0.pdf [accessed: 01.09.2022].

Toledo Museum of Art, Collections Management Policy, September 2015, https://web.archive.org/web/20210818225730/https://www.toledomuseum.org/sites/default/files/collections_management_policy_tma_2015.pdf [accessed: 01.10.2022].

Tsirogiannis C., Due Diligence? Christie’s Antiquities Auction, London, October 2015, “Journal of Art Crime” 2015, Vol. 14.

UNESCO Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property, 14 November 1970, 823 UNTS 231.

UNESCO et al., Managing Cultural World Heritage: Resource Manual, UNESCO, Paris 2013. UNESCO, Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property (UNESCO, Paris, 1970), https://en.unesco.org/sites/default/files/operational_guidelines_en_final_final_1.pdf [accessed: 10.09.2022].

UNESCO, Recommendation concerning the Protection and Promotion of Museums and Collections, their Diversity and their Role in Society, 17 November 2015, UNESCO Doc. CLT/ HER/MHM/2015/PI/H/1.

UNIDROIT Convention on Stolen or Illegally Exported Cultural Objects, 24 June 1995, 34 ILM 1322.

United Nations Security Council, Resolution 1483: The Situation between Iraq and Kuwait, 22 May 2003, S/RES/1483 (2003).

United Nations Security Council, Resolution 2347: Maintenance of International Peace and Security, 24 March 2017, S/RES/2347 (2017).

Vrdoljak A.F., International Law, Museums and the Return of Cultural Objects, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2006.

Washington Principles on Nazi-Confiscated Art, 3 December 1998, https://www.state.gov/washington-conference-principles-on-nazi-confiscated-art/ [accessed: 16.10.2022].

Wilson F. et al., Evaluation of Touchable 3D-printed Replicas in Museums, “Curator: The Museum Journal” 2017, Vol. 60(4).

Yale University Art Gallery, Provenance Research, https://artgallery.yale.edu/collections/provenance-research [accessed: 26.09.2022].