FAQ

Considerations on the Legitimacy of Organizing a Humanitarian Intervention Aimed at Stopping the Intentional Destruction of Cultural Heritage

Publication date: 08.02.2016

Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2015, 2/2015 (1), pp. 101 - 116

https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSR.15.015.4513

Authors

Alberto Frigerio
Kazakh-American University Almaty, Kazakhstan
All publications →

Titles

Considerations on the Legitimacy of Organizing a Humanitarian Intervention Aimed at Stopping the Intentional Destruction of Cultural Heritage

Abstract

Since its inception in Iraq, ISIS has been responsible for the pillaging and destruction of numerous cultural sites, notwithstanding the protests of the international community. None of the solutions proposed and implemented to stop this devastation have so far obtained adequate results. This article analyzes the legitimacy of organizing a humanitarian intervention aimed at preserving cultural heritage from such kinds of destructive actions. Two critical issues are addressed: first, the legitimacy of using armed force to preserve cultural heritage on the behalf of the international community; second, the technical difficulties associated with the development of such a practice.

References

2005 World Summit Outcome, 15 September 2005, UN Doc. A/60/L. 1.

A call to save Iraq’s cultural heritage, a call by Irina Bokova, UNESCO’s Director-General, UNESCO Press, 2014, http://www.unesco.org/new/en/communication-and-information/resources/news-and-in-focus-articles/all-news/news/a_call_to_save_iraqs_cultural_heritage/ [accessed: 30.11.2015].

Badescu C.G., Humanitarian Intervention and the Responsibility to Protect. Security and human rights, Routledge, London – New York 2011.

Blätter A., Williams P.D., The Responsibility Not To Veto: A Way Forward, Citizens for Global Solutions, Washington, DC 2010.

Buchanan A., Reforming the Law of Humanitarian Intervention, in: J.L. Holzgrefe, R.O. Keohane (eds.), Humanitarian Intervention. Ethical, Legal and Political Dilemmas, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2003.

Byers M., Chesterman S., Changing the rules about the rules? Unilateral humanitarian intervention and the future of international law, in: J.L. Holzgrefe, R.O. Keohane (eds.), Humanitarian Intervention. Ethical, Legal and Political Dilemmas, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2003.

Charter of the United Nations, 26 June 1945, 1 UNTS XVI, amended in 1963 (557 UNTS  143), in 1965 (638 UNTS 308), and in 1971 (892 UNTS 119).

Chomsky N., Humanitarian Imperialism: The New Doctrine of Imperial Right, “Monthly Review” 2008, Vol. 60.

Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict, 14 May
1954, 249 UNTS 240.

Cunliffe P., Sovereignty and the politics of responsibility, in: C.J. Bickerton, P. Cunliffe, A. Gourevitch (eds.), Politics without Sovereignty. A critique of contemporary international relations, UCL Press, London 2007.

Evans G., The Responsibility to Protect. Ending Mass Atrocities Crimes Once for All, Brookings Institution Press, Washington 2008.

Farer T.J., Humanitarian Intervention before and after 9/11: Legality and Legitimacy, in: J.L. Holzgrefe, R.O. Keohane (eds.), Humanitarian Intervention. Ethical, Legal and Political Dilemmas, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2003.

Francioni F., The Humanitarian Dimension of International Cultural Heritage Law: An Introduction, “European Journal of International Law” 2011, Vol. 22.

Gibbs D.N., First Do No Harm. Humanitarian Intervention and the Destruction of Yugoslavia, Vanderbilt University Press, Nashville 2009.

Hannum H., The Status of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in National and International Law, “The Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law” 1995/1996, Vol. 25.

Henkin L., How Nations Behave: Law and Foreign Policy, 2nd edn., Columbia University Press, New York 1979.

Holzgrefe J.L., The Humanitarian Intervention Debate, in: J.L. Holzgrefe, R.O. Keohane (eds.), Humanitarian Intervention. Ethical, Legal and Political Dilemmas, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2003.

Implementing the responsibility to protect, report of the Secretary-General, 12 January 2009, UN Doc. A/63/677.

In larger freedom: towards development, security and human rights for all, report of the Secretary- General, 21 March 2005, UN Doc. A/59/2005.

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 16 December 1966, 999 UNTS 171.

International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, 16 December 1966, 993 UNTS 3.

Labonte M., Human Rights and Humanitarian Norms, Strategic Framing and Intervention. Lessons for the responsibility to protect, Routledge, London – New York 2013.

Lauren P.G., The Evolution of International Human Rights, 3rd edn., Pennsylvania University Press, Philadelphia 2011.

McSweeny E., The Doctrine of Humanitarian Intervention: A Double Standard?, “Cork Online Law Review” 2003.

Milligan A., Targeting Cultural Property: The Role of International Law, “Journal of Public and International Affairs” 2008, Vol. 19.

Most destroyed artifacts were copies, the interview to Atheel Njaifi (Mosul Governor), http://rudaw.net/english/Kurdistan/28022015 [accessed: 6.11.2015].

Orford A., International Authority and the Responsibility to Protect, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2011.

Reisman W.M., Sovereignty and Human Rights in Contemporary International Law, “American Journal of International Law” 1990, Vol. 84.

Shimko K.L., International Relations: perspectives & controversies, 3rd edn., Cengage Learning, Wadsworth 2010.

Statute of the International Tribunal for the Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of the Former Yugoslavia since 1991, 25 May 1993, UN Doc. S/RES/827 (1992).

Stone P.G., A four-tier approach to the protection of cultural property in the event of armed conflict, “Antiquity” 2013, Vol. 87.

The Responsibility to Protect, report of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty, ICISS, December 2001.

Treaty between the United States and other Powers Providing for the Renunciation of War as an Instrument of National Policy (Kellogg-Briand Pact), 27 August 1928, 94 LNTS 57.

Türkmen F., From Libya to Syria: The Rise and Fall of Humanitarian Intervention, “German Review on the United Nations” 2015, Vol. 63.

UNESCO Declaration Concerning the Intentional Destruction of Cultural Heritage, 17 October 2003, UNESCO Doc. 32 C/Res. 33 (2003).

Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 10 December 1948, UNGA Res 217 A(III).

Van der Auwera S., Contemporary Conflict, Nationalism, and the Destruction of Cultural Property During Armed Conflict: A Theoretical Framework, “Journal of Conflict Archaeology”

2012, Vol. 7. Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, 23 March 1969, 1155 UNTS 331.

Walzer M., Just and Unjust Wars. A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations, 4th edn., Basic Books, New York 2006.
 

Information

Information: Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2015, 2/2015 (1), pp. 101 - 116

Article type: Original article

Titles:

Polish:

Considerations on the Legitimacy of Organizing a Humanitarian Intervention Aimed at Stopping the Intentional Destruction of Cultural Heritage

English:

Considerations on the Legitimacy of Organizing a Humanitarian Intervention Aimed at Stopping the Intentional Destruction of Cultural Heritage

Authors

Kazakh-American University Almaty, Kazakhstan

Published at: 08.02.2016

Article status: Open

Licence: None

Percentage share of authors:

Alberto Frigerio (Author) - 100%

Article corrections:

-

Publication languages:

English