Baudier P. et al., Peace Engineering: The Contribution of Blockchain Systems to the E-voting Process, “Technological Forecasting and Social Change” 2021, Vol. 162.

Bianco P., Blockchain as a Technology Applied to Authenticity Issues: A Possible New Resource for Building up a Catalogue Raisonne?, “Art Antiquity and Law” 2020, Vol. 25(4).

Brodie N. et al., Illicit Trade in Cultural Goods in Europe: Characteristics, Criminal Justice Responses and an Analysis of the Applicability of Technologies in the Combat Against the Trade, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg 2019.

Brodie N., Uncovering the Antiquities Market, in: R. Skeates et al. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Public Archaeology, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2012.

Bursztynsky J., Feds Seize $3.6 Billion in Bitcoin Stolen from Bitfinex Hack, “CNBC”, 8 February 2022,  https://www.cnbc.com/2022/02/08/feds-seize-3point6-billion-stolen-from-bitfinex-hack.html [accessed: 14.05.2023].

Casertano L., Combatting the Illicit Trafficking of Cultural Property: The Multifaceted Response to a Complex Challenge, “Global Jurist” 2020, Vol. 20(1).

Cohen H.R., Modern(izing) Art: The Need for a Centralized Registry, “Southwestern Journal of International Law” 2020, Vol. 26(2).

Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict, 14 May 1954, 249 UNTS 240.

Cornu M., Recasting Restitution: Interactions between EU and International Law, “Uniform Law Review” 2015, Vol. 20(4).

Council of Europe Convention on Offences relating to Cultural Property, 3 May 2017, CETS No. 221.

De Filippi P., Wright A., Blockchain and the Law, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA 2018.

Derek F., Towards a Rigorous Standard for the Good Faith Acquisition of Antiquities, “Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce” 2010, Vol. 37(2).

Directive 2014/60/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on the return of cultural objects unlawfully removed from the territory of a Member State and amending Regulation (EU) No 1024/2012 (Recast), OJ L 159, 28.05.2014, p. 1.

Doulas S.J., Hayes M., Access to Loss: Copyleft and the Protection of Visual Information, “Art Antiquity and Law” 2016, Vol. 21(2).

Eden T., How I Became Leonardo da Vinci on the Blockchain, 2018, https://shkspr.mobi/blog/2018/06/how-i-became-leonardo-da-vinci-on-the-blockchain [accessed: 16.05.2023].

European Banking Authority, Report with Advice for the European Commission on Crypto-assets, 9 January 2019, https://www.eba.europa.eu/sites/default/documents/files/documents/10180/2545547/67493daa-85a8-4429-aa91-e9a5ed880684/EBA%20Report%20on%20crypto%20assets.pdf [accessed: 14.05.2023].

European Commission, Distributed Ledger Technologies (DLTs) and Blockchains, 18 March 2020, https://knowledge4policy.ec.europa.eu/foresight/topic/accelerating-technological-change-hyperconnectivity/blockchain-cryptocurrency_en [accessed: 14.05.2023].

European Commission, European Blockchain Services Infrastructure: Newsflash, https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/cef/newsletter-archives/35323 [accessed: 14.05.2023].

European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority, Discussion Paper on Blockchain and Smart Contracts in Insurance, 2021, https://www.eiopa.europa.eu/system/files/2021-04/eiopa-discussion-paper-on-blockchain-29-04-2021.pdf [accessed: 14.05.2023].

European Law Institute, ELI Principles on Blockchain Technology, Smart Contracts and Consumer Protection, 2023, https://www.europeanlawinstitute.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/p_eli/Publications/ELI_Principles_on_Blockchain_Technology Smart_Contracts_and_Consumer_Protection.pdf [accessed: 14.05.2023].

European Parliament, Intellectual Property Rights and Distributed Ledger Technology with a Focus on Art NFTs and Tokenized Art, October 2022, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2022/737709/IPOL_STU(2022)737709_EN.pdf [accessed: 14.05.2023].

European Parliamentary Research Service, Blockchain and the General Data Protection Regulation: Can Distributed Ledgers Be Squared with European Data Protection Law?, July 2019, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2019/634445/EPRS_STU(2019)634445_EN.pdf [accessed: 14.05.2023].

European Parliamentary Research Service, Blockchain for Supply Chains and International Trade: Report on Key Features, Impacts and Policy Options, May 2020, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2020/641544/EPRS_STU(2020)641544_EN.pdf [accessed: 14.05.2023].

European Union Intellectual Property Office, EUIPO Connects to TMview and DesignView through Blockchain, 27 April 2021, https://euipo.europa.eu/ohimportal/en/-/news/euipo-connects-to-tmview-and-designview-through-blockchain?TSPD_101_R0=089375ec4aab20005991aadc25bddd773b3fe4ee7e005c416d1627f2f2fe27f9a4d94cf90e3096bb0809735b32143000014b779a1ee4a9cc4526e1c200aa649d8238aeb078f04b6ac9fc1bf7bc739df4a5695d2b61602220dc6e121f8554c45e [accessed: 14.05.2023].

Fincham D., Assessing the Viability of Blockchain to Impact the Antiquities Trade, “Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal” 2019, Vol. 37(3).

Francioni F., Cultural Property in International Law, in: M. Graziadei, L. Smith (eds.), Comparative Property Law, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham 2017.

Frigo M., The Implementation of Directive 2014/60/EU and the Problems of the Compliance of Italian Legislation with International and EU Law, “Santander Art and Culture Law Review” 2016, Vol. 2(2).

Fulli G. et al., Blockchain Solutions for the Energy Transition: Experimental Evidence and Policy Recommendations, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg 2022.

Garcia-Teruel R.M., Legal Challenges and Opportunities of Blockchain Technology in the Real Estate Sector, “Journal of Property, Planning and Environmental Law” 2020, Vol. 12(2).

Gemmell O., Is Good Faith Leaving a Bad Taste? The Role of Good Faith in the Transfer of Corporeal Property in Scots Law, “Edinburgh Student Law Review” 2021, Vol. 4(2).

Goffaux Callebaut G., Barbet-Massin A., Blockchain et marché de l’art, in: La Blockchain, Dalloz, Paris 2020.

Harris K.F., Seeking an Equitable Standard for Transactions in the International Antiquities Trade: A Critique of the 1995 UNIDROIT Convention on Stolen or Illegally Exported Cultural Objects, “U.C. Davis Journal of International Law & Policy” 2020, Vol. 27(1).

Hill K., The Problem of Auction Houses and Illicit Antiquities: A Call for a Holistic Solution, “Texas International Law Journal” 2016, Vol. 51(3).

ICOM International Observatory on Illicit Traffic in Cultural Goods, What Is Illicit Traffic?, https://www.obs-traffic.museum/what-illicit-traffic [accessed: 14.05.2023].

ICOM, Code of Ethics for Museums, 2017, https://icom.museum/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/ICOM-code-En-web.pdf [accessed: 14.05.2023].

International Association of Dealers in Ancient Art, Code of Ethics and Practice, https://iadaa.org/about-us/ [accessed: 14.05.2023].

Kassen M., Blockchain and E-government Innovation: Automation of Public Information Processes, “Information Systems” 2022, Vol. 103.

Kokotsaki E. et al., The Application of Blockchain Technology in Copyright Field: Formalities and “Smart Contracts”, in: 12th International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems & Applications (IISA), 2021.

Konashevych O., Constraints and Benefits of the Blockchain Use for Real Estate and Property Rights, “Journal of Property, Planning and Environmental Law” 2020, Vol. 12(2).

Lambert G., Blanchiment et marché de l’art: le droit et la pratique, L’Harmattan, Paris 2020. Legeais D., BLOCKCHAIN, “Jurisclasseur”, Fasc. 534.

Levine J.A., The Importance of Provenance Documentation in the Market for Ancient Art and Artifacts: The Future of the Market May Depend on Documenting the Past, “DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law” 2009, Vol. 19(2).

Magri G., The Impact of the UNESCO and UNIDROIT Conventions and the EU Directives on the International Art Market: An Analysis Fifty Years after the Introduction of the Obligation to Return Stolen or Illegally Exported Cultural Goods, “Brazilian Journal of International Law” 2020, Vol. 17(3).

Meagher R., A Kimberley Process for Conflict Antiquities: Determining the Viability of a Cultural Property Certification Scheme, “New Zealand Journal of Public and International Law” 2019, Vol. 17(2).

Moskowitz T., The Illicit Antiquities Trade as a Funding Source for Terrorism: Is Blockchain the Solution?, “Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal” 2019, Vol. 37(1).

Nakamoto S., Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System, https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf [accessed: 14.05.2023].

Neuhaus N.M., Balay S., Databases on Lost and Stolen Art: Is Consulting a Database an Inherent Requirement of Good Faith?, “Art Antiquity and Law” 2014, Vol. 19(2).

Orenstein K., Risking Criminal Liability in Cultural Property Transactions, “North Carolina Journal of International Law” 2020, Vol. 45(2).

Rose C., The Transfer of Property Rights by Theft: An Economic Analysis, “European Journal of Law and Economics” 2010, Vol. 30(3).

Schrepel T., Smart Contracts and the Digital Single Market Through the Lens of a “Law + Technology” Approach, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg 2021.

Simmons & Simmons LLP, Blockchain – Le droit et la technologie blockchain: une approche sectorielle, “Contrats Concurrence Consommation” 2017, Vol. 10.

Singh P., Singh S., An Affair of the Art: Contemporary Reflections on the Legal Dimensions of International Art Theft, “Art Antiquity and Law” 2019, Vol. 24(3).

Stoyanov D., The Conflict between the Legal Interests of the Original Owner and the Good Faith Acquirer of Movables: A Comparative Overview of the Solutions, “Lex ET Scientia International Journal” 2015, Vol. 22(1).

Swiss Association of Dealers in Antiques and Art, Ethikcode, http://www.vsak.org/Ethik-code.pdf [accessed: 14.05.2023].

The European Union Blockchain Observatory and Forum, Blockchain Applications in the Healthcare Sector, 2022, https://www.eublockchainforum.eu/sites/default/files/reports/eubof_healthcare_2022_FINAL_pdf.pdf [accessed: 14.05.2023].

Tucker R.L., Stolen Art, Looted Antiquities, and the Insurable Interest Requirement, “Quinnipiac Law Review” 2011, Vol. 29.

Ulph J., The Impact of the Criminal Law and Money Laundering Measures upon the Illicit Trade in Art and Antiquities, “Art Antiquity and Law” 2011, Vol. 16(1).

UNESCO Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property, 14 November 1970, 823 UNTS 231.

UNIDROIT Convention on Stolen or Illegally Exported Cultural Objects, 24 June 1995, 2421 UNTS 457.

Willett H.D., Ill-Gotten Gains: A Response to the Islamic State’s Profits from the Illicit Antiquities Market, “Arizona Law Review” 2016, Vol. 58(3).