Speech management: a metadiscursive function
cytuj
pobierz pliki
RIS BIB ENDNOTEChoose format
RIS BIB ENDNOTELa gestione del discorso: una funzione metadiscorsiva
Publication date: 2020
Romanica Cracoviensia, Volume 20 (2020), Volume 20, Issue 2, pp. 99 - 113
https://doi.org/10.4467/20843917RC.20.010.12556Authors
La gestione del discorso: una funzione metadiscorsiva
Speech management: a metadiscursive function
Metadiscourse (MD) is the unique property of human language to codify messages on language itself. It reveals the author’s presence in reference to speech management and other interventions or comments with which the author either illustrates their opinion on the subject or leads the interlocutor/reader to an understanding of their message. MD was traditionally distinguished from propositional material and considered “material not belonging to the object of discourse”. This paper argues that MD not only supports propositional content, but represents the crucial means by which the latter is perceived by the interlocutor/reader. It also includes a presentation of Ädel’s so-called reflexive model, which avoids the dichotomy between proposition and MD, takes both the author and their interlocutor/reader into consideration, and appropriately highlights the reflexivity through which the importance of the author’s awareness of the text is brought into focus. The empirical part includes the illustration of the metadiscursive functions of the discourse marker cioè.
Ädel Annelie, 2006, Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English, Amsterdam–Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Austin John Langshaw, 1962, How to do things with words, Oxford: Clarendon Press Oxford.
Bazzanella Carla, 1986, I connettivi di correzione nel parlato: usi metatestuali e fatici, (in:) Klaus Lichem, Edith Mara, Susanne Knaller (a cura di), Parallela 2, Aspetti della sintassi dell’italiano contemporaneo, Tübingen: Narr., 35–45.
Bazzanella Carla, 1995, I segnali discorsivi, (in:) Grande grammatica di consultazione, vol. 3, Lorenzo Renzi, Giampaolo Salvi, Anna Cardinaletti (a cura di), Bologna: Il Mulino, 225–257.
Bazzanella Carla, 2005, Linguistica e pragmatica del linguaggio, Roma: Bulzoni.
Ciabarri Federica, 2012, I segnali di riformulazione. Differenze di portata tra orale e scritti, (in:) DIA II: Les variations diasystémiques et leurs interdépendances, Copenhagen: Accademia reale di scienze e belle arti della Danimarca & Università di Copenhagen.
Crismore Avon, Markkanen Raija, Steffensen Margaret, 1993, Metadiscourse in persuasive writing: A study of texts written by American and Finnish university students, Written Communication, 10(1): 39–71.
Du Bois John W., 2007, The stance triangle, (in:) Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction, Robert Englebretson (a cura di), Amsterdam–Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 139–182.
Fele Giolo, 2007, L’analisi della conversazione, Bologna: Il Mulino.
Goffman Erving, 1974/2001, Frame Analysis: An essay on the organization of experience, Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University Press; trad. it. Ivana Matteucci: Frame analysis: l’organizzazione dell’esperienza, Roma: Armando ed.
Hyland Ken, 2005, Metadiscourse, London–New York: Continuum.
Ifantidou Elly, 2005, The semantics and pragmatics of metadiscourse, Journal of Pragmatics 37: 1325–1353.
Jakobson Roman, 1980, The Framework of Language, Michigan: Michigan Studies in the Humanities.
Kurhila Salla, 2001, Correction in talk between native and non-native speaker, Journal of Pragmatics 33: 1083–1110.
Levelt Willem J. M., 1983, Monitoring and self-repair in speech, Cognition 14: 41–104.
Lyons John, 1977/1980, Semantics I, II, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; trad. it. parziale (solo del vol. 1) Stefano Gensini: Manuale di semantica, Roma–Bari: Laterza.
Malinowski Bronisław, 1923, The problem of meaning in primitive languages, (in:) The Meaning of Meaning: A study of influence of language upon thought and of the science of symbolism, Charles Kay Ogden, Ivor Armstrong Richards (a cura di), New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, 296–336.
Mao LuMing, 1993, I Conclude Not: Toward a pragmatic account of metadiscourse, Rhetoric Review, 11(2): 265–289.
Mauranen Anna, 1993, Cultural Differences in Academic Rhetoric: A textlinguistic study, Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Orletti Franca, 2000, La conversazione diseguale, Potere e interazione, Roma: Carocci.
Ruesch Jurgen, Bateson Gregory, 1979, La matrice sociale della psichiatria, Bologna: Il Mulino.
Schegloff Emanuel, Jefferson Gail, Sacks Harvey, 1977, The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation, Language 53/2: 361–382.
Schiffrin Deborah, 1980, Meta-talk: Organizational and evaluative brackets in discourse, Sociological Inquiry: Language and Social Interaction 50: 199–236.
Vande Kopple J. William, 1985, Some exploratory discourse on metadiscourse, College Composition and Communication 36: 82–94.
Verdonik Darinka, 2007a, Jezikovni elementi spontanosti v pogovoru, Maribor: Slavistično društvo.
Verdonik Darinka, 2007b, Upravljanje pogovora kot metadiskurzna funkcija, (in:) Metabesedilnost v uporabnem jezikoslovju, Agnes Pisanski Peterlin (a cura di), Jezik in slovstvo 3/4, Ljubljana: Slavistično društvo Slovenije, 53–65.
Verschueren Jef, 1999, Understanding Pragmatics, London: Arnold.
Williams Joseph M., 1990, Style: Ten Lessons in Clarity and Grace, Boston: Scott Foresman.
Information: Romanica Cracoviensia, Volume 20 (2020), Volume 20, Issue 2, pp. 99 - 113
Article type: Original article
Titles:
La gestione del discorso: una funzione metadiscorsiva
Speech management: a metadiscursive function
University of Ljubljana, Kongresni trg 12 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
Published at: 2020
Article status: Open
Licence: CC BY-NC-ND
Percentage share of authors:
Article corrections:
-Publication languages:
French