Aromanian – Language or Dialect? Overview of Historical and Contemporary Opinions
cytuj
pobierz pliki
RIS BIB ENDNOTEChoose format
RIS BIB ENDNOTEAromanian – Language or Dialect? Overview of Historical and Contemporary Opinions
Publication date: 05.08.2021
Romanica Cracoviensia, Volume 21 (2021), Volume 21, Issue 2, pp. 105 - 114
https://doi.org/10.4467/20843917RC.21.011.14066Authors
Aromanian – Language or Dialect? Overview of Historical and Contemporary Opinions
This article aims at presenting two concepts from the modern typology of the Romance languages, with a special focus on the Aromanian ethnolect. The first concept, which is widely accepted in the Romanian linguistics and was most prevalent before the Second World War, does not recognise Aromanian as a separate language, but treats it as one of four dialects of the Romanian language. The second movement, much closer to modern Romanist research at the international level, opts for a full autonomy of all Balkan Romance ethnolects and attributes to them statuses of national languages. It also negates the existence of a common Romanian language in the first millennium, arguing that the Balkan Romance languages developed independently from a late form of Balkan Latin around the 11th century.
*Translation of the paper founded by the “Proofreading and translations at POB Heritage” programme.
Information: Romanica Cracoviensia, Volume 21 (2021), Volume 21, Issue 2, pp. 105 - 114
Article type: Original article
Titles:
Aromanian – Language or Dialect? Overview of Historical and Contemporary Opinions
Aromanian – Language or Dialect? Overview of Historical and Contemporary Opinions
Jagiellonian University in Kraków, Gołębia 24, 31-007 Kraków, Poland
Published at: 05.08.2021
Article status: Open
Licence: CC BY-NC-ND
Percentage share of authors:
Article corrections:
-Publication languages:
EnglishView count: 1133
Number of downloads: 2021