Modular man – an analysis of brain and body adaptation to the technology in the context of the theories of extended mind and embodied cognition
cytuj
pobierz pliki
RIS BIB ENDNOTEChoose format
RIS BIB ENDNOTECzłowiek z modułów – analiza adaptacyjności umysłu i ciała do wytworów techniki i technologii w kontekście teorii poznania rozszerzonego i ucieleśnionego
Publication date: 16.11.2015
Yearbook of Cognitive Science, 2015, Volume 8, pp. 1 - 11
https://doi.org/10.4467/20843895RK.15.001.4088Authors
Człowiek z modułów – analiza adaptacyjności umysłu i ciała do wytworów techniki i technologii w kontekście teorii poznania rozszerzonego i ucieleśnionego
Modular man – an analysis of brain and body adaptation to the technology in the context of the theories of extended mind and embodied cognition
The ability to adapt to new and ever changing environment has always been one of the primary human skills. In fact, the capacity of using tools has been of upmost importance. The advancement of technology greatly improved the process of adaptation. It had a remarkable impact on the development of human nature, stepping into its inner structure. The technological evolution of mankind has been happening right before our eyes. People are becoming symbiotic with machines, and to various extents becoming cyborgs themselves.
The main point of interest of this paper is to show how the embodied cognition theory and the extended mind theory are able to illustrate the phenomenon of cyborgization. Moreover, we consider how the concepts related to the modular structure of mind and body explain the technological adaptation of humans.
Bostrom N. (2005). Transhumanist values. „Review of Contemporary Philosophy” 4.1‒2, s. 87‒101.
Clark A. (2004). Natural-born Cyborgs: Minds, Technologies, and the Future of Human Intelligence. Oxford: University Press.
Clark A., Chalmers D. (1998). The extended mind. „Analysis” 58.1, s. 7‒19.
Collinger J.L., Wodlinger B., Downey J.E., Wang W., Tyler-Kabara E.C., Weber D.J., McMorland A.J.C., Velliste M., Boninger M.L., Schwartz A.B. (2013). High-performance neuroprosthetic control by an individual with tetraplegia. „The Lancet” 381.9866, s. 557‒564.
De Grey A., Rae M. (2007). Ending Aging: The Rejuvenation Breakthroughs That Could Reverse Human Aging in Our Lifetime. New York: Macmillan.
Dey A.K. (2000). Providing architectural support for building context-aware applications (rozprawa doktorska, Atlanta: Georgia Institute of Technology).
Dreyfus H.L. (1974). Artificial Intelligence. „Annals of the American Academy of Political Social Science” 412, s. 21‒23.
Dreyfus H.L. (2007). Why Heideggerian AI failed and how fixing it would require making it more Heideggerian. „Philosophical Psychology” 20 (2), s. 247‒268.
Fodor J.A. (1983). The Modularity of Mind: An Essay on Faculty Psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Goldman A.I. (2012). A moderate approach to embodied cognitive science. „Review of Philosophy and Psychology” 3 (1), s. 71‒88.
Hohol M. (2010). Umysł: system sprzeczny, ale nietrywialny. „Zagadnienia Filozoficzne w Nauce” 47, s. 89‒108.
Kipper G., Rampolla J. (2013). Augmented Reality: An Emerging Technologies Guide to AR. Waltham: Syngress.
Kirsh D. (2013). Poznanie ucieleśnione i magiczna przyszłość projektowania interakcji. „Avant” 4.2, s. 281‒331.
Lafont C. (2005). Was Heidegger an externalist? „Inquiry” 48 (6), s. 507‒532.
Melzack R., Israel R., Lacroix R., Schultz G. (1997). Phantom limbs in people with congenital limb deficiency or amputation in early childhood. „Brain” 120, s. 1603–1620.
More M. (1999). A letter to Mother Nature. W: M. More, N. Vita-More (red.), The Transhumanist Reader: Classical and Contemporary Essays on the Science, Technology, and Philosophy of the Human Future. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, s. 449‒450.
Nowakowski P. (2012). Podmiot i jego świat „in statu nascendi”. „Avant” 3, s. 9–13.
Pinker S. (2002). Jak działa umysł. Warszawa: Książka i Wiedza.
Sandberg A., Bostrom N. (2006). Converging cognitive enhancements. „Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences” 1093.1, s. 201–227.
Shapiro L. (2011). Embodied Cognition. New York: Routledge Press.
Sharp L.A. (2000). The commodification of the body and its parts. „Annual Review of Anthropo-logy”, s. 287–328.
Vita-More N. (2002). Radical Body Desing ‘Primo Posthuman’. URL = http://www.kurzweilai.net/radical-body-design-primo-posthuman [data pobrania: 20.03.2014].
Vita-More N. (2004). The New [human] Genre – Primo Posthuman. Ciber at RT Conference, Bilbao. URL = http://www.natasha.cc/paper.htm [data pobrania: 21.03.2014].
Wilson R.A., Foglia L. (2011). Embodied Cognition. W: N. Zalta (red.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. URL = http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2011/entries/embodied-cognition/ [data pobrania: 20.03.2014].
Information: Yearbook of Cognitive Science, 2015, Volume 8, pp. 1 - 11
Article type: Original article
Titles:
Człowiek z modułów – analiza adaptacyjności umysłu i ciała do wytworów techniki i technologii w kontekście teorii poznania rozszerzonego i ucieleśnionego
Modular man – an analysis of brain and body adaptation to the technology in the context of the theories of extended mind and embodied cognition
Jagiellonian University in Kraków, Gołębia 24, 31-007 Kraków, Poland
Published at: 16.11.2015
Article status: Open
Licence: None
Percentage share of authors:
Article corrections:
-Publication languages:
PolishView count: 2596
Number of downloads: 8911