The status of the self-government of attorneys-at-law in light of the Code of Administrative Procedure – from the perspective of considering complaints, requests and petitions

Aleksander Jakubowski

The status of the self-government of attorneys-at-law in light of the Code of Administrative Procedure – from the perspective of considering complaints, requests and petitions

Publication date: 31.10.2022

Attorney-at-Law, 2022, 2 (31), pp. 307 - 320

https://doi.org/10.4467/23921943RP.22.036.16899

Authors

Pobierz pełny tekst

PDF

Titles

The status of the self-government of attorneys-at-law in light of the Code of Administrative Procedure – from the perspective of considering complaints, requests and petitions

Abstract

The subject of this article is the status of the self-government of attorneys-at-law analysed in the light of the Code of Administrative Procedure from the perspective of addressing complaints, requests, and petitions. The analysis leads to the conclusion that based on the Code of Administrative Procedure, the self-government of attorneys-at-law is a social organization. Thus, its bodies are the bodies of a social organization, unless they handle administrative cases. The paper distinguishes four categories of situations connected with the application of the provisions on complaints and petitions as part of the activities of the self-government of attorneys-at-law.

Keywords

professional self-government, attorneys-at-law, complaints, requests, petitions

References

Download references

Literature

Adamiak B., Borkowski J., Code of Administrative Procedure. Comment, Warsaw 2021.

Gajewski S., [in:] S. Gajewski, A. Jakubowski, Petycje, skargi i wnioski. Dział VIII Kodeksu postępowania administracyjnego. Ustawa o petycjach. Komentarz [Petitions, complaints and requests. Section VIII of the Code of Administrative Procedure. Act on petitions. Comment], Warsaw 2015.

Gronkiewicz A., Organizacja społeczna w ogólnym postępowaniu administracyjnym [Social organization in general administrative proceedings], Warsaw 2012.

Jaśkowska M., [in:] M. Jaśkowska, A. Wróbel, Code of Administrative Procedure. Comment, Zakamycze 2005.

Klonowski K., Art. 5, [in:] Code of Administrative Procedure. Comment, ed. H. Knysiak-Molczyk, Warsaw 2015.

Klonowski K., The Notary Chamber as a party to the procedure for appointing a notary. Gloss to the resolution of a panel of seven judges of the Supreme Administrative Court of September 22, 2014, II GPS 1/14, “Przegląd Prawa Publicznych” [“Review of Public Law”] 2017, No. 5.

Knysiak-Molczyk H., Art. 240, [in:] Code of Administrative Procedure. Comment, ed. H. Knysiak-Molczyk, Warsaw 2015.

Nędzarek A., Local government organizations, [in:] System Prawa Administracyjnego Procesowego. Zakres przedmiotowy i podmiotowy postępowania administracyjnego ogólnego[Process Administrative Law System. Objective and subjective scope of general administrative proceedings], vol. II, part 1, ed. W. Chróścielewski, Warsaw 2018.

Tarno J.P., A gloss to the resolution of a panel of seven judges of the Supreme Administrative Court of December 12, 2005, file ref. act II OPS 4/05, “Zeszyty Naukowe Sądownictwa Administracyjnego” [“Scientific Journal of the Administrative Judiciary”] 2006, No. 1.

Wegner J., Art. 221, [in:] Code of Administrative Procedure. Comment, ed. Z. Kmieciak. W. Chróścielewski, Warsaw 2019.

WojciechowskaK., Art. 240, [in:] Code of Administrative Procedure. Comment, ed. R. Hauser, M. Wierzbowski, Warsaw 2021.

Woś T., A gloss to the judgement of the Supreme Administrative Court of 9 March 1988, IV SAB 30/87, “Orzecznictwo Sądów Polskich i Komisji Arbitrażowych”[“Jurisprudence of Polish Courts and Arbitration Commissions”] 1989, No. 6.

Legal acts

Act of August 30, 2002 – Law on Proceedings before Administrative Courts (consolidated text: Dz.U. of 2022, item 329 with later amendments).

Act of July 11, 2014 on petitions (consolidated text: Dz.U. of 2018, item 870 with later amendments).

Act of June 14, 1960 r. – Code of Administrative Procedure (Dz.U. of 2021, item 735 with later amendments).

Act on Attorneys-at-Law of 6 July 1982 (consolidated text: Dz.U. of 2022, item 1166).

Judgements

Resolution of Supreme Administrative Court of September 22, 2014] (II GPS 1/14), ONSAiWSA [“Case law of the Supreme Administrative Court and the voivodeship administrative courts”] 2015, 1, item 4.

Judgement of the Supreme Administrative Court of March 9, 1988 (IV SAB 30/87), “Orzecznictwo Sądów Polskich i Komisji Arbitrażowych”[“Jurisprudence of Polish Courts and Arbitration Commissions”] 1989, No. 6, item 133.

The judgement of the Supreme Court of 20 September 2002 (III RN 144/01), OSNAPU 2003, No. 15, item 348.

Information

Information: Attorney-at-Law, 2022, 2 (31), pp. 307 - 320

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/23921943RP.22.036.16899

Article type: Original article

Titles:

Polish:

The status of the self-government of attorneys-at-law in light of the Code of Administrative Procedure – from the perspective of considering complaints, requests and petitions

English:

The status of the self-government of attorneys-at-law in light of the Code of Administrative Procedure – from the perspective of considering complaints, requests and petitions

Authors

Aleksander Jakubowski

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5937-9591

University of Warsaw, Krakowskie Przedmieście 30, 00-927 Warszawa, Poland

Published at: 31.10.2022

Article status: Open

Licence: None

Percentage share of authors:

Aleksander Jakubowski (Author) - 100%

Article corrections:

Publication languages:

English

View count: 208

Number of downloads: 183

<div id="cke_pastebin"> The status of the self-government of attorneys-at-law in light of the Code of Administrative Procedure – from the perspective of considering complaints, requests and petitions</div>

Download xml