FAQ

Professional secrecy of attorneys-at-law and their independence

Publication date: 31.10.2022

Attorney-at-Law, 2022, 2 (31), pp. 297 - 306

https://doi.org/10.4467/23921943RP.22.035.16898

Authors

Tomasz Niedziński
University of Warsaw, Krakowskie Przedmieście 30, 00-927 Warszawa, Poland
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0997-1773 Orcid
All publications →

Titles

Professional secrecy of attorneys-at-law and their independence

Abstract

The goal of this article is to analyze and evaluate the phenomenon of professional secrecy of attorneys-at-law and their independence. This article is a result of the author’s particular interest in the issues concerning the independence of attorneys-at-law and its limits. The essence of this publication is to illustrate the complexity of this phenomenon.

The author tried to pay special attention to situations in which the obligation to maintain professional secrecy is subject to restrictions resulting from the specific nature of particular types of proceedings – primarily criminal proceedings, but also proceedings in the field of competition protection. The author also points out the consequences that an attorney-at-law faces for violating the obligation to maintain professional secrecy. 

References

Download references
Literature
Brylak J., Tajemnica radcowska w Kodeksie postępowania karnego, [in:] Publicznoprawny status radcy prawnego, ed. M. Pawełczyk, R. Stankiewicz, Warsaw 2012.
Gruszecka D., Kodeks Postępowania Karnego. Komentarz, ed. J. Skorupka, 5th edition, Warsaw 2021.
Korczak L., Ustawa o Radcach Prawnych. Komentarz 2018, ed. T Scheffler, 1st edition, Warsaw 2018.
Seroka D., Tajemnica zawodowa a wykorzystywanie informacji nią objętych przez radcę prawnego we własnej sprawie dyscyplinarnej, [in:] Tajemnica zawodowa radcy prawnego, ed. R. Stankiewicz, Warsaw 2018.
Sobutka J., Woroniecka A., Kodeks Etyki Radcy Prawnego. Komentarz, ed. T. Scheffler, 3rd edition, Warsaw 2021.
Stankiewicz R., Zakres Ochrony Tajemnicy Zawodowej Radcy Prawnego jako „prawnika wewnętrznego” w postępowaniach z zakresu ochrony konkurencji, [in:] Publicznoprawny status radcy prawnego, ed. M. Pawełczyk, R. Stankiewicz, Warsaw 2012.
Legal acts
Act on Attorneys-at-Law of 06.07.1982, Journal of Laws 2020.75.
Annex to Resolution No. 3/2014 of the Extraordinary National Convention of Attorneys-at-Law of 22.11.2014 on the Code of Ethics of Attorneys-at-Law.
Code of Criminal Procedure of 06.06.1997, Journal of Laws of 1997, no. 89, item 555, consolidated text published in Journal of Laws of 2021, item 534.
Constitution of the Republic of Poland of 02.04.1997, Journal of Laws 1997.78.483.
Judgments
Judgment of the Constitutional Tribunal of 22.11.2004, ref. no. SK 64/03.
Judgment of the Constitutional Tribunal of 26.11.2003, ref. no. SK 22/02.
Decision of the Court of Appeal in Katowice of 09.06.2020, II AKz 535/20, Legalis.
Decision of the Court of Appeal in Kraków of 07.06.2018, II AKz 231/18, Legalis.
Decision of the Court of Appeal in Łódź of 05.04.2018, II AKz 155/18, Legalis.
Decision of the Court of Appeal in Warsaw of 15.05.2008, II AKz 294/08, Legalis.
Judgment of the Higher Disciplinary Court of 14.03.2016, ref. no. WO-95/15.
Akzo Nobel Chemicals Ltd., Akcros Chemicals Ltd v. Commission, Judgment of the European Court of Justice of 14.09.2010., C-550/07 P, OJ C 37 of 09.02.2008.

Information

Information: Attorney-at-Law, 2022, 2 (31), pp. 297 - 306

Article type: Original article

Titles:

Polish:

Professional secrecy of attorneys-at-law and their independence

English:

Professional secrecy of attorneys-at-law and their independence

Authors

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0997-1773

Tomasz Niedziński
University of Warsaw, Krakowskie Przedmieście 30, 00-927 Warszawa, Poland
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0997-1773 Orcid
All publications →

University of Warsaw, Krakowskie Przedmieście 30, 00-927 Warszawa, Poland

Published at: 31.10.2022

Article status: Open

Licence: None

Percentage share of authors:

Tomasz Niedziński (Author) - 100%

Article corrections:

-

Publication languages:

English