Trash Streaming: Characteristics and Methodological Guidelines
cytuj
pobierz pliki
RIS BIB ENDNOTEChoose format
RIS BIB ENDNOTETrash Streaming: Characteristics and Methodological Guidelines
Publication date: 2022
Arts & Cultural Studies Review, 2022, Issue 3 (53) Technology between empowerment and exclusion, pp. 445 - 458
https://doi.org/10.4467/20843860PK.22.029.16618Authors
Trash Streaming: Characteristics and Methodological Guidelines
Livestreaming is an opportunity to participate in digital social life, both for streamers and their audience. This participation is associated with the possibility of spreading content considered as socially harmful. Although trash streams have been popular in Central Europe for several years, they are still not fully characterized. Previous studies define them rather operationally – for the needs of a given analysis. This study fills that gap. Based on long-term observation of trash streamers activity and review of the literature and press reports, the authors provide a comprehensive description of trash streams pointing to differences in nomenclature used in Poland and worldwide. The article also provides methodological guidelines for the analysis of trash streams. The authors developed these guidelines on the basis of the analysis of the literature and their own research experience.
Angielczyk P.Z., Homo Crudelis in the Era of Internet, “Parezja” 2019, no. 2 (12), pp. 48–64.
Artwick C.G., Social Media Livestreaming: Design for Disruption?, Routledge, London 2019.
Bek D., Popiołek M., Patostreaming – Characteristics and Legal Contexts of the Phenomenon, “Media Management” 2019, vol. 7 (4), pp. 247–262.
Bucher T., Networking, or What the Social Means in Social Media, “Social Media + Society” 2015, no. 1 (1).
CNET News Staff, YouTube’s Super Chat Hijacked for Hate Speech, CNET, 3.11.2018, https://www.cnet.com/news/youtubes-super-chat-hijacked-for-hate-speech/ (accessed: 25.07.2022).
Davis K., TWISTED TREND Inside Horrific ‘Death-Streaming’ Craze Where Viewers Pay to Watch Torture, Humiliation and Death Live on YouTube, “The Sun”, 30.03.2021, https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/14466280/russias-disturbing-trash-streaming-trend/.
Dijck J. van, Facebook as a Tool for Producing Sociality and Connectivity, “Television & New Media” 2012, no. 2 (13), pp. 160–176.
Edge N., Evolution of the Gaming Experience: Live Video Streaming and the Emergence of a New Web Community, “Elon Journal of Undergraduate Research in Communications” 2013, vol. 4 (2).
Fuller M.Y., Mukhopadhyay S., Gardner J.M., Using the Periscope Live Video-Streaming Application for Global Pathology Education: A Brief Introduction, “Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine” 2016, vol. 140 (11), pp. 1273–1280.
Gilbert M.A., Strengthening Your Social Media Marketing with Live Streaming Video [in:] A. Al-Masri, K. Curran (eds.), Smart Technologies and Innovation for a Sustainable Future, Springer, Cham 2019, pp. 357–365.
Goldhaber M.H., The Attention Economy and the Net, “First Monday” 1997, vol. 2 (4).
Horsman G., Reconstructing Streamed Video Content: A Case Study on YouTube and Facebook Live Stream Content in the Chrome Web Browser Cache, “Digital Investigation” 2018, no. 26, S30–S37.
Hu M., Zhang M., Wang Y., Why Do Audiences Choose to Keep Watching on Live Video Streaming Platforms? An Explanation of Dual Identification Framework, “Computers in Human Behavior” 2017, no. 75, pp. 594–606.
Hu Y., Tian Y., Yang W., Wang X., Zhang X., Content to Cash: Understanding and Improving Crowdsourced Live Video Broadcasting Services with Monetary Donations, “Computer Networks” 2020, no. 178, article no. 107281.
Jas M., Patostreaming – The Dark Side of the Internet: Analysis of the Occurence on Selected Examples, “Media Business Culture: Journalism and Social Communication” 2020, no. 1 (8), pp. 169–180.
Kang K., Lu J., Guo L., Li W., The Dynamic Effect of Interactivity on Customer Engagement Behavior through Tie Strength: Evidence from Live Streaming Commerce Platforms, “International Journal of Information Management” 2021, no. 56, article no. 102251.
Karaś A., Patostreaming i jego społeczny odbiór [in:] A. Kampka (ed.), Doświadczanie społeczeństwa – muzyka, obraz, media, Wydawnictwo SGGW, Warszawa 2019, pp. 222–235.
Kmieciak-Goławska A., Pathostreaming as a Way of Popularising the Subculture of Violence, “Biuletyn Polskiego Towarzystwa Kryminologicznego im. Profesora Stanisława Batawii” 2019, no. 25, pp. 171–183.
Kułaga W., Transmission of Social Pathologies to the Internet: Threats Posed by Media Activity of Patoinfluencers, Patostreamers and Patousers, „Com.press” 2022, no. 4 (2), pp. 70–88.
Laitinen A., Särkelä A., Four Conceptions of Social Pathology, “European Journal of Social Theory” 2018, no. 1 (22), pp. 80–102.
Lakshmi S., The Alarming Rise in Content Creators Who Profit from Cruelty, An Injustice!, 7.02.2022, https://aninjusticemag.com/the-alarming-rise-in-content-creators-who-profitfrom-cruelty-da9401045210 (accessed: 25.07.2022).
Luxmoore M., ‘Sign on and Take Part in Something Real’: Inside the Dark, Lucrative World of Russian ‘Trash-Streaming’, Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, 26.02.2021, https://www.rferl.org/a/russia-trash-streamiing-dark-dares-pranks-lucrative-livestream-youtube/ 31123624.html (accessed: 25.07.2022).
Obszarny M., Rafonix skazany za polowanie na „wykopka” w Piotrkowie. Sąd uznał, że to był samosąd, “Dziennik Łódzki”, 23.04.2019, https://dzienniklodzki.pl/rafonix-skazany-za-polowanie-na-wykopka-w-piotrkowie-sad-uznal-ze-to-byl-samosad/ar/c1-14071477 (accessed: 25.07.2022).
Pawłowska S., The Dark Nooks of YouTube – Patostreaming, “Remedium” 2018, no. 6, pp. 2–4.
Pradeep M., ‘Trash Streaming’ Is a Disturbing YouTube Subculture Where Streamers Get Paid to Broadcast Abuse, Screen Shot, 7.06.2021, https://screenshot-media.com/visual-cultures/internet-culture/trash-streaming-subculture/ (accessed: 25.07.2022).
Ryabikova V., Welcome to the World of Russian Thrash Streams, Where People Get Insulted and Bullied for Money, Russia Beyond, 21.01.2021, https://www.rbth.com/lifestyle/333280-welcome-to-world-of-russianp-trash-streams (accessed: 25.07.2022).
Santora J., 75 Live Video Streaming Stats Every Marketer Should Know, Influencer Marketing Hub, 21.05.2021, https://influencermarketinghub.com/live-streaming-stats (accessed: 25.07.2022).
Shen Y.-C., What Do People Perceive in Watching Video Game Streaming? Eliciting Spectators’ Value Structures, “Telematics and Informatics” 2021, no. 59, article no. 101557.
Siedlanowski P., Homo crudelis? Patostream – kolejna patologia w sieci, “Biuletyn Edukacji Medialnej” 2018, no. 2, pp. 44–57.
Sjöblom M., Hamari J., Why Do People Watch Others Play Video Games? An Empirical Study on the Motivations of Twitch Users, “Computers in Human Behavior” 2017, vol. 75, pp. 985–996.
The Storyteller, Russian Streamer Kills Pregnant Girlfriend Live for $1000 Tip, Medium, 17.05.2021, https://medium.com/lessons-from-history/russian-streamer-kills-pregnantgirlfriend-live-for-1000-tip-a05755bd8cc4 (accessed: 25.07.2022).
Suler J., The Online Disinhibition Effect, “Cyberpsychology & Behavior” 2004, vol. 7 (3), pp. 321–326.
Tammy Lin J.-H., Bowman N., Lin S.-F., Chen Y.-S., Setting the Digital Stage: Defining Game Streaming as an Entertainment Experience, “Entertainment Computing” 2019, vol. 31, article no. 100309.
Törhönen M., Giertz J., Weiger W.H., Hamari J., Streamers: The New Wave of Digital Entrepreneurship? Extant Corpus and Research Agenda, “Electronic Commerce Research and Applications” 2021, no. 46, article no. 101027.
Trash streaming, Slangit, https://slangit.com/meaning/trash_streaming (accessed: 25.07.2022).
Tyszkowski J., Trash streaming, czyli zarabianie na okrucieństwie. Dlaczego w Rosji jest to trend?, Vibez, 5.03.2022, https://vibez.pl/wydarzenia/trash-streaming-czyli-zarabianie-na-okrucienstwie-dlaczego-w-rosji-jest-to-trend-6743682085870144a (accessed: 25.07.2022).
Wojtyna M., Boredom, Bovver, Subjectivity: Pathostream as Genre, “Tekstualia. Literary Artistic Academic Palimpsests” 2019, no. 3, pp. 55–70.
Wójcik S., Wojtasik Ł. (eds.), Patocontent on the Internet: A Problem Report, Empowering Children Foundation, Warsaw 2019.
Yu E., Jung C., Kim H., Jung J., Impact of Viewer Engagement on Gift-giving in Live Video Streaming, “Telematics and Informatics” 2018, no. 5 (35), pp. 1450–1460.
Information: Arts & Cultural Studies Review, 2022, Issue 3 (53) Technology between empowerment and exclusion, pp. 445 - 458
Article type: Original article
Titles:
Trash Streaming: Characteristics and Methodological Guidelines
Trash Streaming: Characteristics and Methodological Guidelines
DSW University of Lower Silesia
Institute of Culture, Jagiellonian University
ul. prof. Stanisława Łojasiewicza 4, 30-348 Kraków, Poland
Published at: 2022
Article status: Open
Licence: CC BY
Percentage share of authors:
Article corrections:
-Publication languages:
EnglishView count: 2651
Number of downloads: 991