Transgressive Automatons. Re-Visioning the Cyborg in Larissa Lai’s Rachel
cytuj
pobierz pliki
RIS BIB ENDNOTEChoose format
RIS BIB ENDNOTETransgressive Automatons. Re-Visioning the Cyborg in Larissa Lai’s Rachel
Publication date: 03.2023
Arts & Cultural Studies Review, 2023, Issue 1 (55) Kulturowe emancypacje i transgresje, pp. 69 - 83
https://doi.org/10.4467/20843860PK.23.005.17848Authors
Transgressive Automatons. Re-Visioning the Cyborg in Larissa Lai’s Rachel
The article aims to analyze the ways in which Larissa Lai, in her short story Rachel, appropriates and racializes the figure of the cyborg by re-visioning and retelling the story of one of the most iconic characters in the history of cinema, the android Rachael from Ridley Scott’s Blade Runner (and, by extension, her literary predecessor).
Using postcolonial theory as well as theory of science fiction as the primary methodological frameworks, the article demonstrates how – by infusing the character of Rachael/Rachel with a hybrid identity – Lai engages in a discussion concerning race, belonging, and the power struggle between the central and the peripheral. This struggle, in turn, is embodied by the liminality of the cyborg, who may be interpreted as a metaphor for all that eludes (and actively rejects) the colonial Self–Other binary. This, in turn, highlights the tensions accompanying the intrusion of the peripheral into the hegemonic and allows for a more in-depth discussion of the processes concerning negotiation of identity.
Moreover, the paper focuses on the way in which Lai constructs the metaphor of the Othered, racialized cyborg in order to deconstruct the notion of the cyborg perceived as a neutral (i.e. white) entity, writing against the hegemonic canon. In this way, the racialized cyborg stands as the symbol of transgression, rebellion and rejection of the center/periphery dichotomy, one which eschews the (neo)colonial binaries and becomes a source of anxiety for the hegemonic discourse.
Ashcroft B., Griffiths G., Tiffin H., Postcolonial Studies: The Key Concepts, Routledge, London 2013.
Ashcroft B., Tiffin H., Griffiths G. (eds.), The Post-Colonial Studies Reader, Routledge, London-New York 2006.
Bhabha H., Of Mimicry and Man; Signs Taken for Wonders: Questions of Ambivalence and Authority Under a Tree Outside Delhi, May 1817 [in:] idem, Location of Culture, Routledge, London-New York 1994.
Broderick D., Reading by Starlight: Postmodern Science Fiction, Routledge, New York-London 1995.
Dick P.K., Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?, Del Rey/Ballantine Books, New York 1996.
Foster T., Meat Puppets or Robopaths? [in:] J. Wolmark (ed.), Cybersexualities: A Reader on Feminist Theory, Cyborgs and Cyberspace, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh 1999.
Foster T., The Sex Appeal of the Inorganic: Posthuman Narratives and the Construction of Desire [in:] idem, The Souls of Cyberfolk: Posthumanism as Vernacular Theory, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis 2005.
Gibson W., Neuromancer, Ace Science Fiction, New York 1984.
Grosz E., Volatile Bodies: Toward a Corporeal Feminism, Indiana University Press, Bloomington 1994.
Haraway D., A Cyborg Manifesto [in:] eadem, Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature, Routledge, New York 1990.
Hayles N.K., How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics, University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1999.
James E., Science Fiction in the 20th Century, Oxford University Press, Oxford-New York 1994.
Lai L., Rachel [in:] N. Hopkinson, U. Mehan (eds.), So Long Been Dreaming: Postcolonial Science Fiction and Fantasy, Arsenal Pulp Press, Vancouver 2004.
Leonard E.A., Race and Ethnicity in Science Fiction [in:] E. James, F. Mendlesohn (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Science Fiction, Cambridge University Press, New York 2003.
McCormack D., Queer Postcolonial Narratives and the Ethics of Witnessing, Bloomsbury Academic, New York 2014.
Memmi A., The Colonizer and the Colonized, Beacon Press, Boston 1993.
Mitchell K., Bodies That Matter: Science Fiction, Technoculture, and the Gendered Body, "Science Fiction Studies" 2006, vol. 33 (1), pp. 109-128.
Neumann B., The Literary Representations of Memory [in:] A. Erll, A. Nünning (eds.), A Companion to Cultural Memory Studies, De Gruyter, Berlin 2010.
Rieder J., Science Fiction, Colonialism, and the Plot of Invasion, "Extrapolation" 2005, vol. 46 (3), pp. 373-394.
Roberts A., Defining Science Fiction [in:] idem, Science Fiction: The New Critical Idiom, Routledge, London-New York 2000.
Said E., Orientalism, Vintage Books, New York 1979.
Senior W.A., Blade Runner and Cyberpunk Visions of Humanity, "Film Criticism" 1996, vol. 21 (1), pp. 1-12.
Shaviro S., The Erotic Life of Machines, "Parallax" 2002, vol. 8 (4), pp. 21-31.
Tiffin H., Post-Colonial Literatures and Counter-Discourse [in:] B. Ashcroft, G. Griffiths, H. Tiffin (eds.), The Post-Colonial Studies Reader, Routledge, London-New York 2002.
Vint S., Bodies of Tomorrow, University of Toronto Press, Toronto 2019.
Wolfe C., What Is Posthumanism?, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis 2010.
Information: Arts & Cultural Studies Review, 2023, Issue 1 (55) Kulturowe emancypacje i transgresje, pp. 69 - 83
Article type: Original article
Titles:
Transgressive Automatons. Re-Visioning the Cyborg in Larissa Lai’s Rachel
Transgressive Automatons. Re-Visioning the Cyborg in Larissa Lai’s Rachel
Silesia University, Bankowa 12, 40-007 Katowice
Published at: 03.2023
Article status: Open
Licence: CC BY
Percentage share of authors:
Article corrections:
-Publication languages:
EnglishView count: 488
Number of downloads: 308