Calabresi S.G., Originalism and James Bradley Thayer, „Northwestern University Law Review” 2019, t. 113, nr 6.

Caminker E.H., Thayerian Deference to Congress and Supreme Court Supermajority Rule: Lessons from the Past, „Indiana Law Journal” 2003, t. 78, nr 1.

Coquillette D.R., Kimball B.A., On the Battlefield of Merit: Harvard Law School, the First Century, Cambridge-London 2015.

Coquillette D.R., Kimball B.A., The Intellectual Sword: Harvard Law School, the Second Century, Cambridge-London 2020.

Eisgruber C.L., The Next Justice: Repairing the Supreme Court Appointments Process, Princeton-Oxford 2007.

Florczak-Wątor M., Domniemanie konstytucyjności ustawy oczywiście niekonstytucyjnej, w: Sądownictwo konstytucyjne, red. M. Granat, t. 2, Warszawa 2019.

Franck M.J., James Bradley Thayer and the Presumption of Constitutionality: A Strange Posthumous Career, „American Political Thought. A Journal of Ideas, Institutions, and Culture” 2019, t. 8, nr 3.

Gabin S.B., Judicial Review, James Bradley Thayer, and the „Reasonable Doubt” Test, „Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly” 1976, t. 3.

Grabowski A., Konstytucja RP jako lex superior względem prawa ustawowego (w ramach sądowego stosowania prawa), „Państwo i Prawo” 2022, z. 10.

Green C.R., Clarity and Reasonable Doubt in Early State-Constitutional Judicial Review, „South Texas Law Review” 2015, t. 57, nr 2.

Hand L., The Bill of Rights, Cambridge-London 1958.

Healy T., The Great Dissent: How Oliver Wendell Holmes Changed His Mind and Changed the History of Free Speech in America, New York 2013.

Hook J., A Brief Life of James Bradley Thayer, „Northwestern University Law Review” 1993, t. 88, nr 1.

Kramer L.D., Judicial Supremacy and the End of Judicial Restraint, „California Law Review” 2012, t. 100, nr 3.

Lakier G., The First Amendment’s Real Lochner Problem, „The University of Chicago Law Review” 2020, t. 87, nr 5.

Mendelson W., The Influence of James B. Thayer upon the Work of Holmes, Brandeis, and Frankfurter, „Vanderbilt Law Review” 1978, t. 31, nr 1.

Podkowik J., Glosa do wyroku WSA w Poznaniu z 8.03.2017 r., II SA/Po 1034/16 (oczywista niekonstytucyjność jako przesłanka odmowy stosowania ustawy przez sąd), „Państwo i Prawo” 2018, z. 5.

Porwancher A., The Strange Birth (and Stranger Death) of Judicial Restraint, < https://startingpointsjournal.com/the-strange-birth-and-stranger-death-of-judicial-restraint/ >, dostęp: 1 kwietnia 2023 r.

Porwancher A., Mazeitis J., Jipp T., Coffey A., The Prophet of Harvard Law: James Bradley Thayer and His Legal Legacy, Lawrence 2022.

Posner R.A., The Rise and Fall of Judicial Self-Restraint, „California Law Review” 2012, t. 100, nr 3.

Shemtob Z.B., Following Thayer: The Many Faces of Judicial Restraint, „Public Interest Law Journal” 2011, t. 21.

Snyder B., The House of Truth: A Washington Political Salon and the Foundations of American Liberalism, New York 2017.

Spitzer H., Reasoning v. Rhetoric: The Strange Case of „Unconstitutional Beyond a Reasonable Doubt”, „Rutgers University Law Review” 2022, t. 74.

Spitzer H., „Unconstitutional Beyond a Reasonable Doubt” – A Misleading Mantra that Should Be Gone for Good, „Washington Law Review Online” 2021, t. 96.

Stelmach J., Kurek Ł., Psychologia potoczna w myśleniu prawniczym, Warszawa 2022.

Sunstein C.R., Thayerism, < https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4215816>, dostęp: 1 kwietnia 2023 r.

Thayer J.B., A Preliminary Treatise on Evidence at the Common Law, Boston 1898.

Thayer J.B., Cases on Constitutional Law, cz. 1 i 2, Cambridge 1894.

Thayer J.B., The Origin and Scope of the American Doctrine of Constitutional Law, „Harvard Law Review” 1893, t. 7, nr 3.

Thayer J.B., Western Journey with Mr. Emerson, Boston 1884.

Tushnet M., Thayer’s Target: Judicial Review or Democracy?, „Northwestern University Law Review” 1993, t. 88, nr 1.

Wigmore J.H., A Treatise on the System of Evidence in Trials at Common Law: Including the Statutes and Judicial Decision of All Jurisdictions of the United States, England, and Canada, Boston 1904.