FAQ

The Metaphorical Aspect of Hans Kelsen’s Pure Theory of Law

Publication date: 19.12.2018

Principia, 2018, Volume 65, pp. 185-206

https://doi.org/10.4467/20843887PI.18.008.9891

Authors

Monika Zalewska
Department of Theory and Philosophy of Law, Faculty of Law and Administration, University of Lodz
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9849-4883 Orcid
Contact with author
All publications →

Download full text

Titles

The Metaphorical Aspect of Hans Kelsen’s Pure Theory of Law

Abstract

The article examines the cognitive, metaphorical dimension of the pure theory of law and demonstrates that Hans Kelsen used metaphorical language in his description of law, and unintentionally created a unique set of cognitive metaphors in order to make a theory of law focused on the abstract “Ought” world comprehensible. The paper argues that it would be impossible for Kelsen to describe norms without metaphors. The paper uses Lakoff and Johnson’s theory as a framework for the interpretation of this metaphorical aspect of the pure theory of law. Hence the following paragraphs will examine the cognitive context of the abstract categories crucial for the pure theory of law, such as: the category of Ought, imputation, basic norms and the dynamic (hierarchical) structure of law. This article is based on the position that an analysis of the cognitive dimension of the pure theory of law might yield promising results which could reveal new aspects of the central categories in this theory. This article is an attempt to explore the possibilities provided by merging these two theories and checking if the result brings some new knowledge about the pure theory of law and legal thinking in general.

References

Download references

Bulygin, Eugenio. 1990. “An Antimony in Kelsen’s Pure Theory of Law.” Ratio Juris 3 (1): 29–45.

Bulygin, Eugenio. 2015a. “Remarks on Kelsen’s Validity and Efficacy of the Law.” In Essays in Legal Philosophy, edited by Carlos Bernal, Carla Huerta, Tecla Mazzarese, Jose Juan Moreso, Pablo E. Navarro, and Stanley L. Paulson, 69–74. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bulygin, Eugenio. 2015b. “The Concept of Efficacy.” In Essays in Legal Philosophy, edited by Carlos Bernal, Carla Huerta, Tecla Mazzarese, Jose Juan Moreso, Pablo E. Navarro, and Stanley L. Paulson, 37–51. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bulygin, Eugenio. 2015c. “The Problem of Legal Validity in Kelsen’s Pure Theory of Law.” In Essays in Legal Philosophy, edited by Carlos Bernal, Carla Huerta, Tecla Mazzarese, Jose Juan Moreso, Pablo E. Navarro, and Stanley L. Paulson, 311–323. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Heidemann, Carsten. 1997. Die Norm als Tatsache. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.

Kelsen, Hans. 1923. Hauptprobleme der Staatsrechtslehre. Tübingen: Scienta.

Kelsen, Hans. 1945. General Theory of Law and State. Translated by Anders Wedberg. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Kelsen, Hans. 1967. Pure Theory of Law. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Kelsen, Hans. 1979. General Theory of Norms. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Kelsen, Hans. 2010. “Die Philosophischen Grundlagen der Naturrechtslehre und des Rechtspositivismus.” In Die Wiener rechtstheoretische Schule, edited by Hans Klecatsky, Rene Marcic, and Herbert Schambeck, 231–288. Wien: Franz Steiner Verlag.

Kelsen, Hans. 2015. “Validity and Efficacy of the Law.” In Essays in Legal Philosophy, edited by Carlos Bernal, Carla Huerta, Tecla Mazzarese, Jose Juan Moreso, Pablo E. Navarro, and Stanley L. Paulson, 52–68. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 2003. Metaphors We Live By. 2nd edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Paulson, Stanley L. 1988. “An Empowerment Theory of Legal Norms.” Ratio Juris 1 (1): 58–72.

Paulson, Stanley L. 1992. “The Neo-Kantian Dimension of Kelsen’s Pure Theory of Law.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 12 (3): 311–332.

Paulson, Stanley L. 2001. “Hans Kelsen’s Doctrine of Imputation.” Ratio Juris 14 (1): 47–63.

Pils, Ramon. 2016. Terminologiewörterbuch Hans Kelsen. Vienna: Manz Verlag.

Zalewska, Monika. 2015. “Gunman Situation, Vicious Circle and Pure Theory of Law.” In Problems of Normativity, Rules and Rule-Following, edited by Michał Araszkiewicz, Paweł Banaś, Tomasz Gizbert-Studnicki, 189–198. Berlin: Springer Verlag.

Information

Information: Principia, 2018, Volume 65, pp. 185-206

Article type: Original article

Titles:

English:

The Metaphorical Aspect of Hans Kelsen’s Pure Theory of Law

Polish: Metaforyczny aspekt czystej teorii prawa Hansa Kelsena

Authors

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9849-4883

Monika Zalewska
Department of Theory and Philosophy of Law, Faculty of Law and Administration, University of Lodz
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9849-4883 Orcid
Contact with author
All publications →

Department of Theory and Philosophy of Law, Faculty of Law and Administration, University of Lodz

Published at: 19.12.2018

Article status: Open

Licence: CC BY-NC-ND  licence icon

Article financing:

The research on this article was funded by the National Science Centre, Poland, no. 2015/17/B/HS5/00495.

Percentage share of authors:

Monika Zalewska (Author) - 100%

Article corrections:

-

Publication languages:

English

The Metaphorical Aspect of Hans Kelsen’s Pure Theory of Law

cytuj

pobierz pliki

RIS BIB ENDNOTE