Mobility by the way or roadside societies and zones of flow. Practical usage of the “paradigm of new mobilities”
cytuj
pobierz pliki
RIS BIB ENDNOTEChoose format
RIS BIB ENDNOTEMobilność mimochodem czyli przydrożne społeczności i strefy przepływu. Praktyczne zastosowanie „paradygmatu nowych mobilności”
Publication date: 17.01.2016
Ethnographies, 2015, Tom 43, Numer 3, pp. 213 - 226
https://doi.org/10.4467/22999558.PE.15.017.4877Authors
Mobilność mimochodem czyli przydrożne społeczności i strefy przepływu. Praktyczne zastosowanie „paradygmatu nowych mobilności”
Mobility by the Way or Roadside Societies and Zones of Flow. Practical Usage of the “Paradigm of New Mobilities”
This article looks at a particular problem relating to the use of a theory of mobility with reference to transitions of local cultural, social and economic landscapes in roadside societies. The problem is set beside ethnographic research carrying out in Polish localities situated between the A2 motorway and the national road no. 92 – on the section between Bolewice and Boczów. Field studies are conducted within project “Moving modernizations. Influence of motorway A2 on local cultural landscapes” financed by The National Science Centre. In this article I consider the research situation where the mobility category as the theory is not central, but remains empirically observed phenomena. Although the flow and transit are clearly present in studied societies (govern varying micromobilities) doesn’t explain adequately its everyday life. Theoretical assumptions relating to the mobility and movement became blurred. The paradigmatic concept of mobility is questionable primarily because of the grassroots perspectives exposed the roadside societies as local and relative immobile. This issue becomes even more significant in the light of the application of mobile and multi-sited research methods. When researchers are propelled and are in constant movement dynamics of mobility are distorted.
Adey P., Mobility, London–New York, 2010.
Augé M., Non-Places: An Introduction to Supermodernity, przeł. J. Howie, London–New York, 1995.
Büscher M. i in. (red.), Mobile Methods, London–New York, 2011.
Canzler W., Kaufmann W., Kesselrings S. (red.), Tracing Mobilities: Towards a Cosmopolitan Perspective, Burlington, 2008.
Castells M., Społeczeństwo sieci, przeł. M. Marody, Warszawa, 2008.
Clifford J., Travelling Culture, [w:] Cultural Studies, red. L. Grossberg, C. Nelson, P. Treinch, New York, 1992, s. 96–116.
Clifford J., Routes: Travel and Translation in the Late Twentieth Century, Cambridge, 1997.
Cresswell T., On the Move: Mobility in the Modern Western World, New York, 2006.
Cresswell T., Mobilities I: Catching up, „Progress in Human Geography”, t. 35(4)2011, s. 550–558.
Cresswell T., Mobilities II: Still, „Progress in Human Geography”, t. 36(5)2012, s. 645–653.
Fincham B. i in. (red.), Mobile Methodologies, Houndmills–Basingstoke–Hampshire–New York, 2010.
Friedman J., From Roots to Routes: Tropes for Trippers, „Anthropological Theory”, t. 2(1)2002, s. 21–36.
Glick Schiller N., Salazar N.B., Regimes of Mobility Across the Globe, „Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies”, t. 39(2)2013, s. 183–200.
Hannam K., Sheller M., Urry J., Mobilities, Immobilities and Moorings, „Mobilities”, nr 1, 2006, s. 1–22.
Jurkowska B., Demografia a rynek mieszkaniowy we wschodnich landach niemieckich ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem Brandenburgii, „PWSZ IPiA Studia Lubuskie”, t. 9, 2013, s. 163–177.
Kabzińska I., Trauma kulturowa. Doświadczanie zmian systemowych w postsocjalistycznej Polsce, „Bulletin of the Institute of Ethnography SASA”, t. 57(2)2009, s. 83–94.
Kaufmann V., Bergman M.M., Joye D., Motility: Mobility as Capital, „International Journal of Urban and Regional Research”, t. 28(4)2004, s. 745–756.
Kuligowski W., Stanisz A., On the Road: Polish Modernization from the Perspective of the Anthropology of the Motorway, [w:] Rethinking Ethnography in Central Europe, red. M. Buchowski, H. Cervinkowa, Z. Uherek, New York, 2015, s. 175–194.
Marcus G., Ethnography in/of the World System: The Emergence of Multi-Sited Ethnography, „Annual Review of Anthropology”, nr 24, 1995, s. 95–117.
Muñoz-Escalona F., Korstanje M., How Much Mobile we are?, „Antrocom: Online Journal of Anthropology”, t.10(2), 2014, s. 175–185, http://www.antrocom.net/upload/sub/antrocom/100214/06-Antrocom.pdf (dostęp: 10.09.2015).
Pankow R., Legendy i historie ziemi torzymskiej i okolic, Sulęcin, 2002.
Salazar N.B., Towards an Anthropology of Cultural Mobilities, „Crossings: Journal of Migration and Culture”, t. 1(1)2010, s. 53–68.
Salazar N.B., The Power of the Imagination in Transnational Mobilities, „Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power”, t. 18(6)2011, s. 576–598.
Salazar N.B., Anthropology, [w:] The Routledge Handbook of Mobilities, red. P. Adey i in., London, 2013a, s. 55–63.
Salazar N.B., Ethnographies of Mobility: What’s in a Name?, [w:] Ethnographies of Mobility. International seminar: Programme and Book of Proceedings, red. N. Gregorič Bon i in., Ljubljana, 2013b, s. 18–27.
Salazar N.B., Imagining Mobility at the ‘End of the world’, „History and Anthropology”, t. 24(2), 2013c, s. 233–252.
Shaw J., Hesse M., Transport, geography and the ‘new’ mobilities, “Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers”, t. 34(3)2010, s. 305–312.
Shaw J., Sidaway J., Making Links: On (Re)engaging with Transport and Transport Geography, „Progress in Human Geography”, t. 35(4)2010, s. 502–520.
Sheller M., Urry J., The New Mobilities Paradigm, „Environment and Planning A”, t. 38(2) 2006, s. 207–226.
Stan i struktura ludności oraz ruch naturalny w przekroju terytorialnym w 2014 r. Stan w dniu 31 XII, http://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/ludnosc/ludnosc/ludnosc-stan-i-struktura-ludnosci-oraz-ruch-naturalny-w-przekroju-terytorialnym-stan-w-dniu-31-xii-2014-r-,6,17.html (dostęp: 2.08.2015).
Szczepaniak B. i in., 20 lat miasta Torzym na szlaku turystycznym, Sulęcin–Torzym–Zielona Góra, 2014.
Sztompka P., Trauma wielkiej zmiany: społeczne koszty transformacji, Warszawa, 2000.
Urry J., Sociology Beyond Societies: Mobilities for the Twenty-first Century, London, 2000.
Urry J., Mobilities, Cambridge, UK, Malden, MA, 2007.
Information: Ethnographies, 2015, Tom 43, Numer 3, pp. 213 - 226
Article type: Original article
Titles:
Mobilność mimochodem czyli przydrożne społeczności i strefy przepływu. Praktyczne zastosowanie „paradygmatu nowych mobilności”
Mobility by the way or roadside societies and zones of flow. Practical usage of the “paradigm of new mobilities”
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan, Department of Ethnology and Cultural Anthropology, Św. Marcin 78, 61-809 Poznań, Poland
Published at: 17.01.2016
Article status: Open
Licence: None
Percentage share of authors:
Article corrections:
-Publication languages:
PolishView count: 2863
Number of downloads: 1276