Экспериментальное исследование анафоры. Методологические проблемы в кросслингвистических исследованиях
cytuj
pobierz pliki
RIS BIB ENDNOTEChoose format
RIS BIB ENDNOTEЭкспериментальное исследование анафоры. Методологические проблемы в кросслингвистических исследованиях
Publication date: 02.03.2016
Language and Method, 2016, 3, pp. 335-343
Authors
Экспериментальное исследование анафоры. Методологические проблемы в кросслингвистических исследованиях
This paper is a cross-linguistic study of pronoun interpretation in various syntactic construction across three groups of language speakers: non-brain-damaged adults, children (age 4–5), and agrammatic aphasic patients. Using the obtained experimental results as a tool, and comparing data from different languages, we managed to determine the main principles responsible for pronoun interpretation which are consistent with the Primitives of Binding framework. This theory combines the modular approach to the language system with the economy principle in the process of reference assignment. Special attention is paid to methodological questions, especially to procedure choice and stimuli adaptation.
Прокопеня В. К., 2014, Некоторые особенности референциального развития детей раннего возраста [в:] Шестая международная конференция по когнитивной науке. Тезисы докладов, с. 741–742.
Прокопеня В. К., Храковская М. Г., Черниговская Т. В., 2008, Некоторые факты взаимосвязи процессов усвоения и утраты языка. Экспериментальное исследование анафорических отношений местоимений в русском языке, Вестник Санкт-Петербургского государственного университета, серия 9, с. 82–97.
Chomsky N., 1995, The Minimalist Program, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky N., 2000, Minimalist inquiries: The framework [в:] R. Martin, D. Michaels, J. Uriagereka (eds.), Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, с. 89–155.
Crain S., Thornton R., 1998, Investigations in Universal Grammar. A guide to experiments on the acquisition of syntax and semantics, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Philip W., Coopmans P., 1996, The role of lexical feature acquisition in the development of pronominal anaphora [в:] W. Philip, F. Wijnen (eds.), Amsterdam Series on Child Language Development, vol. 5, Amsterdam: Instituut Algemene Taalwerenschap 68.
Prokopenya V., Chernigovskaya T., Grammar and information structure infl uence on anaphora resolution: evidence from Russian (в печати).
Reuland E., 2001, Primitives of binding, Linguistic Inquiry, 32, с. 439–492.
Rohde H., Kehler A., 2014, Grammatical and information-structural infl uences on pronoun production, Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience, Special Issue on Production of Referring Expressions: Models and Empirical Data, с. 912–927.
Ruigendijk E., Baauw S., Zuckerman S., Vasic N., 2011, A cross-linguistic study on the interpretation of pronouns by children and agrammatic speakers: Evidence from Dutch, Spanish and Italian [в:] E. Gibson, N. J. Pearlmutter (eds.), The Processing and Acquisition of Reference, Cambridge MA – London: MIT Press.
Sheldon A., 1974, Role of parallel function in acquisition of relative clauses in English, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, с. 272–281.
Zuckerman S., Vasic N., Ruigendijk E., Avrutin S., 2002, Experimental evidence for the subject rule [в:] Y. F. Falk (ed.), Proceedings of IATL 18, http://atar.mscc.huji.ac.il/~english/IATL/18/TOC.html; дата обращения: 30.11.2014.
Information: Language and Method, 2016, 3, pp. 335-343
Article type: Original article
Titles:
Экспериментальное исследование анафоры. Методологические проблемы в кросслингвистических исследованиях
Saint Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia
Published at: 02.03.2016
Article status: Open
Licence: CC BY
Percentage share of authors:
Article corrections:
-Publication languages:
RussianView count: 2142
Number of downloads: 1264