Measures to counter tax evasion: international and russian experience
cytuj
pobierz pliki
RIS BIB ENDNOTEChoose format
RIS BIB ENDNOTEMeasures to counter tax evasion: international and russian experience
Publication date: 30.06.2019
Financial Law Review, 2019, Issue 14 (2)/ 2019, pp. 31 - 40
https://doi.org/10.4467/22996834FLR.19.007.10768Authors
Measures to counter tax evasion: international and russian experience
The article is devoted to such actual method of tax evasion as a bypass of the law. The main purpose of this contribution is to figure out the most effective way to counter tax evasion. The following scientifi c methods were used in this study: analysis, comparative study, and others. The article describes the most common tax legal doctrines both in Russia and in foreign countries. The author comes to the conclusion that the most effective way to counter tax evasion would be applying judicial legal doctrines. According to the results of the study, the author comes to the conclusion that it is necessary to implement certain judicial legal doctrines into Russian tax legislation.
1. Asa Investerings Partnership, et al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 340 U.S. App. D.C. 55; 201 F.3d 505; 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 1207; 2000 – 1 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) P50, 185; 85 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 675 (United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit; Argued Oct. 19, 1999; Decided Feb. 1, 2000) // http://www.irs.gov.
2. Bouvier, M.: Introduction au droit fi scal general et a la theorie de l’impot (Introduction to general tax law and the theory of taxation), Paris: L.G.D.J., 2000.
3. Congress of the United States, Joint Committee on Taxation, (JCX-84-99) Nov. 10, 1999. Appendix II To JCX-82-99: Description And Analysis Of Present-Law Tax Rules And Recent Proposals Relating To Corporate Tax Shelters. https://www.jct.gov.
4. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Gordon, 391 U.S. 83 (1968; Argued Apr. 4, 1968; Decided May 20, 1968). http://supreme.justia.com.
5. Eli D. Goodstein et al., Petitioners, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 267 F.2d 127 (United States Court of Appeals First Circuit, May 21, 1959). http://bulk.resource.org.
6. Havanova, I.A.: Vzaimozavisimye litsa: korporativnye pokrovy I fi skalnye problem (Interdependent entities: corporate coverages and fi scal issues), Zhurnal rossyskogo prava (Journal of Russian Law) no. 7 (2018).
7. Frank Lyon Company v. United States, 435 U.S. 561 (1978; Argued Nov. 2, 1977; Decided Apr. 18, 1978). http://www.law.cornell.edu.
8. Malinovskiy, A.A.: Zloupotreblenie subectivnym pravom (teoretiko-pravovoe issledovanie) (Subjective law abuse (theoretical and legal research), Moscow, 2007.
9. Minnesota Tea Co. v. Helvering, Commissioner of Internal Revenue (1938; Argued Dec. 16, 1937; Decided Jan. 17, 1938) 302 U.S. 609, 613 (1938). http://www.law.cornell.edu.
10. Muranov, A.I.: Problema “obhoda zakona” v materialnon i kollisionnom prave (Th e problem of “circumvention of the law” in the material and confl ict of laws): avtoreferat dissertatsii (dissertation), Moscow, 1999.
11. Romanova, A.: Th e New Anti Abuse Rule in Slovak Tax Law: Strengtening of Legal Certainty? in: System of Financial Law : System of Tax, Brno : Masaryk University, Faculty of Law, 2015.
12. Savseris, S.V.: Kategoriya “nedobrosovestnost” v nalogovom prave (Category “bad faith” in tax law), Moscow: Statut, 2007.
13. Skalicka, H.: Abuse of Law – Infl uence of Case Law of Court of Justice of the European Union on the Taxation in the Czech Republic, in: System of Financial Law : System of Tax, Brno : Masaryk University, Faculty of Law, 2015.
14. The Encyclopedia of words and phrases. Legal maxims. Canada. 1825–1940. Vol. I.
15. Vinnitskiy, D.V.: Princip dobrosovestnosti i zloupotreblenie pravom v sfere nalogooblozheniya (Th e principle of good faith and abuse of the right in the fi eld of taxation), Pravo i ekonomika (Law and economics) no. 1 (2003).
16. Volkov, A.V.: Konec epohi “optimizacii nalogov” v predprinimatelskoy deyatelnosty (Th e end of the era of “tax optimization” in business), Zhurnal predprinimatelskogo korporativnogo prava (Journal of Business Law) no. 3 (2018).
Information: Financial Law Review, 2019, Issue 14 (2)/ 2019, pp. 31 - 40
Article type: Original article
Department of Financial Law, Law Faculty, Voronezh State University
Published at: 30.06.2019
Article status: Open
Licence: CC BY-NC-ND
Percentage share of authors:
Classification number:
Article corrections:
-Publication languages:
EnglishView count: 686
Number of downloads: 738