Andrzej Czyżewski
Quarterly Journal of the History of Science and Technology, Volume 67, Issue 1, 2022, pp. 7 - 8
https://doi.org/10.4467/0023589XKHNT.22.001.15437Andrzej Czyżewski
Quarterly Journal of the History of Science and Technology, Volume 67, Issue 1, 2022, pp. 11 - 41
https://doi.org/10.4467/0023589XKHNT.22.002.15438The article aims to sketch the biography of a person who significantly contributed to the development of research on the history of the occupation in Poland, including the Holocaust, and who is wrongly marginalized in the Polish reflection on the evolution of this discipline. The text is based on the analysis of broadly understood historiographic sources. I focus primarily on the following problems: Dobroszycki’s intellectual biography; theoretical frameworks of his scientific work; his input to research on World War II and the Holocaust; last but not least Dobroszycki’s role in Polish-Jewish scientific dialogue.
Andrzej Czyżewski
Studia Historica Gedanensia, Tom 9 (2018), 2018, pp. 208 - 228
https://doi.org/10.4467/23916001HG.18.012.10328The Image of the Enemy – Stanisław Sojczyński “Warszyc” in the Press, Literature and Cinematography of the Peolple’s Republic of Poland
Summary
The purpose of this article is to analyze how Stanisław Sojczyński “Warszyc”, one of the leaders of the anticommunist underground movement in postwar Poland who was captured and then killed, was portrayed within the official politics of memory by the People’s Republic of Poland. The author is mostly interested in the slow evolution of Sojczyński’s image from nothing more than a common “bandit” in the mid 40’s, to a partially acknowledged “patriot” twenty years later. The study shows that even though Sojczyński was consistently described as a major enemy of the communist state, some significant changes developed over time in the way that he was portrayed. This case study is based on detailed examination of materials such as press articles, novels and even a film, which all dealt with the story of Sojczyński and his troops. Aleida Assmann’s distinction between communicative and collective memory is employed as a main theoretical framework.