FAQ

Zeszyty Pracy Socjalnej

Wyniki wyszukiwania

wyszukiwarka prosta

szukaj np. “cognitive architectures” AND 1993-200 NOT Urban
wyszukiwanie zaawansowane
np. 1234-6789
np. 10.4467/16890027AP.16.022.6009
np. Uniwersytet Jagielloński

Social Capital and Childbearing Tendencies with Emphasis on Generational Differences (Case Study: Babol City)

Data publikacji: 2021

Zeszyty Pracy Socjalnej, 2021, Tom 26, Numer 1, s. 1 - 26

https://doi.org/10.4467/24496138ZPS.21.001.13842

Autorzy

,
Reza Alipour
University of Mazandaran
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8821-0402 Orcid
Wszystkie publikacje autora →
,
Yaghoob Foroutan
University of Mazandaran
Wszystkie publikacje autora →
Mahmoud Sharepour
University of Mazandaran
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1969-9419 Orcid
Wszystkie publikacje autora →

Pobierz pełny tekst

Pobierz PDF PDF
Drukuj drukuj Cytuj cytuj Udostępnij udostępnij __T_ARROW_DOWN

Tytuły

Social Capital and Childbearing Tendencies with Emphasis on Generational Differences (Case Study: Babol City)

Abstrakt

Aim: The present study aims to investigate the effects of social capital components on childbearing tendencies with an emphasis on generational differences.

Method: The statistical population of this study is people aged 15 years and older in Babol city. Using Cochran’s formula, 383 people were selected as the sample population and a multi-stage cluster sampling method was used. The research method, survey, and data collection tool was a researcher-made questionnaire whose validity was confirmed through face validity. The reliability of the items was obtained through Cronbach’s alpha of 0.8. Also, the theoretical framework of this study was a combination of theories of social capital and childbearing tendencies. 

Findings: The results of the Pearson test indicated a statistically significant correlation between some variables of social capital and childbearing tendencies. Furthermore, the results of generation regression analysis on some independent variables (trust, support, and real social network) and research dependent variables showed that 23.7% of the changes in these variables could be explained by generations. Also, the results of social capital regression analysis on childbearing tendencies revealed a relationship between the variables of social trust, social support, and real social network. Among these three variables, social support was found to be the strongest predictor variable with a beta coefficient of 0.387. The results of path analysis, like regression analysis, showed the effect of age, trust, support, and real social network variables on childbearing tendencies; in total, social support variable had the greatest overall effect on childbearing tendencies (0.492).

Słowa kluczowe

Bibliografia

Pobierz bibliografię
Abbasi Shavazi M.J., Drahaki A. (2017). The Effect of Social Media Mechanisms on the Intention of Women to Have Children in Urban Areas of Bushehr. “Bi-Quarterly Journal of Demographic Studies”, 1 (4): 39–7.
Abdollahi M., Mousavi M. (2007). Social Capital in Iran: Current Situation, Future Perspectives and the Possibility of Transition. “Social Welfare Quarterly”, 25 (6): 195–233.
Abdolmaleki S., Nasiri F. (2016). Determining the Relationship between Perceived Social Support and Quality of Life with the Mediating Role of Perceived Stress in Women Heads of Households in Sanandaj. “Applied Sociology”, 64 (27): 99–116.
Alipour P. et al. (2009). Trust and Participation: A Study of the Relationship between Trust and Social Participation in Tehran. “Iranian Journal of Sociology”, 2 (10): 109–135.
Bernardi L. (2003). Yearing. Channels of Social Influence on Reproductions. “Population Research and Policy Review”: 527–555.
Bernardi L., Klarner A. (2014). Social Networks and Fertility. “Demographic Research”, 30 (22): 461–670.
Bongaarts J. (2003). Completing the Fertility Transition in the Developing World: The Role of Educational Differences and Fertility Preferences. “Population Studies. A Journal of Demography”, 57 (3): 321–335.
Buhler Ch. (2004). Additional Work, Family Agriculture, and the Birth of a First or a Second Child in Russia at the Beginning of the 1990s. “Population Research and Policy Review”, 23: 259–289.
Buhler Ch. (2005). How Much do Inequalities of Income Matter for Fertility Intentions in Transitional Societies? Some Empirical Descriptions from Bulgaria. Paper presented at Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America, Philadelphia, April 2005. 
Buhler Ch., Fratczak E. (2004). Learning from Others and Receiving Support: The Impact of Personal Network an Fertility Intention in Poland. “Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research”: 1–26.
Buhler Ch., Kohler H.-P. (2004). Der Einfluss starker Beziehungen auf die Nutzung modern Kontrazeptiva in Kenia. “Zeitschrift fur Soziologie”, 33: 5–25.
Buhler Ch., Philipov D. (2005). Social Capital Related to Fertility: Theoretical Foundations and Empirical Evidence from Bulgaria. “Vienna Yearbook of Population Research”: 3, 53–81.
Buka S.L., Brennan R.T., Rich-Edwards J.W., Raudenbush S.W., Earls F. (2003). Neighborhood Support and the Birth Weight of Urban Infants. “American Journal of Epidemiology”, 157: 1–8.
Burt R.S. (1982). Toward a Structural Theory of Action: Network Models of Social Structure, Perception, and Action. Academic Press, New York.
Casterline J.B. (2001). Diffusion Processes and Fertility Transition: Introduction, in: Diffusion processes and fertility transition. Selected perspectives, ed. J.B. Casterline. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.: 1–38.
Di Giulio P., Buhler Ch., Ette A., Fraboni R., Ruckdeschel K. (2012). Social Capital and Fertility Intentions: The Case of Italy, Bulgaria, and West Germany. „Vienna Institute of Demography Working Papers”, 2: 1–27.
Dominguez S., Watkins C. (2003). Creating Networks Social Capital and Latin–American Income Mothers, “Social Problems” , 5 (1): 111–135.
Fathi S., Motlagh M. (2011). Globalization and Generational Distance. “Quarterly Journal of Strategic Studies in Public Policy”, 5 (2): 145–177.
Field J. (2009). A Social Capital Toolkit for Schools? Organisational Perspectives on Current Social Capital Research, in: Social Capital, Professionalism and Diversity, ed. J. Allan, J. Ozga, G. Smith (Studies in Inclusive Education, Vol. 5). Brill Publishers, Leiden: 21–35.
Firouzbakht M., Tirgar A., Hajian Tilaki K., Bakouei F., Nikpour M. (2019). Social Capital and Single Child in Employed Women. „Hakim Research Journal”, 22 (3 (86)), 241–248; https://www.sid.ir/en/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=864081 (accessed: 20.07.2020).
Forootan Y., Karami F. (2016). Patterns and Determinants of Childbearing Tendencies in Iran. “Letter of the Iranian Demographic Association”, 21 (11): 71–100.
Ghodrati H. et al. (2011). Analysis of Social Capital and Fertility in Urban Areas of Sabzevar. “Quarterly Arid Regions Geographic Studies”, 4 (1): 74–94.
Haug S. (2000). Soziales Kapital und Kettenmigration. Italienische Migranten in Deutschland. Leske + Budrich, Opladen.
Hawe P., Shiell A. (2000). Social Capital and Health Promotion. “Social Science & Medicine”, 51: 871–885.
Hosseini H., Begi B. (2012). Study of Reproductive Tendencies of Kurdish Women in Mahabad. “Strategic Studies of Women”, 85 (15): 121–161.
Kalantari S. et al. (2010). Sociological Study of Childbearing Tendencies and Some Related Factors. “Applied Sociology”, 37 (21): 83–104.
Katz N. et al. (2004). Small Group Research. “Sage Publication”, 35 (3): 306–333.
Kaveh Firooz Z. et al. (2017). The Effect of Social and Cultural Capital Components on Attitudes toward Childbearing. “Social Studies and Research in Iran”, 1 (6): 143–1199.
Leeuwen M. van (2017). The Influence of Grandparental Related Social Capital on Fertility Intentions. The University of Utrekht, Utrekht, The Netherlands.
Mahmoudian H. (2000). Research in Theoretical Fields and Experimental Results of Migration and Reproduction. “Letter of the Social Sciences Association”, 15 (16): 164–147.
Mohammadi N., Seifuri B. (2016). Sociological Study of Factors Affecting Female Fertility Preference. “Cultural-Educational Quarterly of Women and Family”, 36 (11): 49–70.
Nabavi A. et al. (2009). Study of the Effect of Social Support on the General Health of the Elderly. “Iranian Journal of Sociology”, 4 (80): 21–27.
Nasrollahi Vasti L., Beheshti M.B. (2016). Dynamic Analysis of the Role of Social Capital in the Development Process: An Interdisciplinary Approach. “Social Sciences Quarterly”, 72 (25): 1–31.
Niazi M. et al. (2016). Meta-analysis of Social Factors Affecting Fertility in Iran. “Quarterly Journal of Welfare Planning and Social Development”, 29 (7): 69–118.
Niazi M., Nasrabadi M. (2007). Sociological Determination of the Phenomenon of Generation Gap and its Causes and Factors. “Domestic Policy”, 2 (1): 185–227.
Noghani M., Asgharpour M., Ahmad R. (2008). A Comparative Study of Approaches and Indicators Used in Measuring Social Capital. “Management and Development Process”, 68: 55–32.
Palloni A., Massey D.S., Ceballos M., Espinosa K., Spittel M. (2001). Social Capital and International Migration: A Test Using Information of Family Networks. “American Journal of Sociology”, 106 (5): 1262–1298.
Pevalin D.J., Wade T.J., Brannigan A., Sauve R. (2001). Beyond Biology: The Social Context of Prenatal Behaviour and Birth Outcomes. “Sozial- und Praventivmedizin”, 46: 233–239.
Philipov D. (2003). Fertility in Times of Discontinuous Societal Change, in: Population of Central and Eastern Europe: Challenges and Opportunities, eds. I.E. Kotowska, J. Jozwiak. Statistical Publishing Establishment, Warsaw: 665–690.
Philipov D., Speder Z., Billari F. (2004). Fertility Intentions and Their Timing: Theory and Evidence from Bulgaria and Hungary, Draft prepared for the PAA Meeting (Population Association of America) April 1–3, 2004, Boston; https://paa2004.princeton.edu/papers/40761 (accessed: 20.07.2020).
Rad F.., Thawabi H. (2015). Study of Tendency to Fertility and Related Social Factors. “Women and Family Studies”, 1: 127–155.
Ramezankhani A. et al. (2013). Childbearing Decision Model. “Monitoring Quarterly”: 515–505.
Rasoulzadeh Aghdam S. et al. (2016). Analysis of the Relationship between Social Capital and Lifestyle, “Socio-cultural Strategy”, fifth year, 20: 135–107.
Riahi M.E. et al. (2010). Study of the Relationship between Social Support and Mental Health. “Social Welfare Quarterly”, 10 (39): 85–121.
Rogers E.M., Kincaid D.L. (1981). Communication Networks. Free Press. New York.
Rossier C., Bernardi L. (2009). Social Interaction Effects on Fertility: Intention and Behaviours, „Revue europeenne de Demographie”/ “European Journal of Population”, 25 (4): 467–485.
Sadeghi H.S., Sarai H. (2016). Factors Affecting the Tendency of Women to Have Children in Tehran. “Quarterly Journal of Welfare Planning and Social Development”, 7 (27): 1–31.
Sharipour M. et al. (2010). Study of the Situation of Social Capital among Young People with Emphasis on Gender. “Iranian Social Science Studies”, 33 (9): 135–153.
Statistics Center of Iran, General Population and Housing Census, 2016.
Szreter S., Woolcock M. (2004). Health by Association? Social Capital, Social Theory, and the Political Economy of Public Health. “International Journal of Epidemiology”, 33: 650–667.
Tamnaeifar M., Mansouri Nik A. (2013). Predicting Life Satisfaction Based on Personality Traits, Social Support and Spiritual Well-being. “Quarterly Journal of New Psychological Research”, 29 (8): 67–87.
United Nation, World Fertility and Family Planning 2020, Department of Economic and Social Capital Affairs: 1–4.
Valente T.W., Watkins S.C., Jato M.N., Straten A. van der, Tsitsol L.-P.M. (1997). Social Network Associations with Contraceptive Use among Cameroonian Women in Voluntary Associations. „Social Science & Medicine”, 45: 677–687.
Woolcock M., Narayan D. (2000). Social Capital: Implications for Development Theory. “Research and Policy. The World Bank Research Observer”: 49–225.
Zahirinia M. et al. (2016). Social Trust and Its Impact on Social Participation of Hormozgan University Students, “Hormozgan Research Journal”, 11: 86–136.

Informacje

Informacje: Zeszyty Pracy Socjalnej, 2021, Tom 26, Numer 1, s. 1 - 26

Typ artykułu: Oryginalny artykuł naukowy

Tytuły:

Polski:
Social Capital and Childbearing Tendencies with Emphasis on Generational Differences (Case Study: Babol City)
Angielski:

Social Capital and Childbearing Tendencies with Emphasis on Generational Differences (Case Study: Babol City)

Autorzy

University of Mazandaran

Publikacja: 2021

Status artykułu: Otwarte __T_UNLOCK

Licencja: CC BY-NC-ND ikona licencji

Udział procentowy autorów:

Reza Alipour (Autor) - 33%
Yaghoob Foroutan (Autor) - 33%
Mahmoud Sharepour (Autor) - 34%

Korekty artykułu:

-

Języki publikacji:

Angielski

Liczba wyświetleń: 1070

Liczba pobrań: 571

<div id="cke_pastebin"> Social Capital and Childbearing Tendencies with Emphasis on Generational Differences (Case Study: Babol City)</div>
Pobierz PDF Pobierz xml