FAQ
Logotyp Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego

Unpopular Literature? John Heywood’s The Spider and the Flie

Data publikacji: 21.12.2023

Terminus, 2023, Tom 25, zeszyt 4 (69) 2023, s. 387 - 403

https://doi.org/10.4467/20843844TE.23.024.19267

Autorzy

Greg Walker
Department of English Literature, University of Edinburgh
, Wielka Brytania
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1276-6698 Orcid
Wszystkie publikacje autora →

Tytuły

Unpopular Literature? John Heywood’s The Spider and the Flie

Abstrakt

This article examines an idiosyncratic, lavishly illustrated mid-Tudor English printed book, John Heywood’s The Spider and the Flie (1556), a book condemned both in the sixteenth century and since as incomprehensible and virtually unreadable. The article argues, rather, that the book’s gestation period was long and complex, but that, once this is understood, the book becomes readily comprehensible, in both its structure and implications. It looks briefly at evidence for ownership of the book, and then moves to discuss what it, along with Heywood’s collected volumes of proverbs and epigrams, can contribute to a discussion of early-modern popular literature, the subject of the UNA Europa funded network, Popular Respublica Litteraria, to which this article is a contribution.

Bibliografia

Primary sources

Holinshed, Raphael, The first and second volumes of Chronicles comprising 1 The description and history of England, 2 The description and history of Ireland, 3 The description and history of Scotland: first collected and published by Raphael Holinshed, William Harrison, and others…, London: Henry Denham, 1587.

A Parable of the Spider and the Flie, Made by John Heywood, London: Thomas Powell, 1556.

 

Secondary sources

Bakhtin, Mikhail, Rabelais and His World, trans. Hélène Iswolsky, Bloomington, Indiana 1984.

de la Bère, Rupert, John Heywood: Entertainer, London 1937.

Blayney, Peter, The Stationers Company and the Printers of London, 2 vols., Cambridge 2013.

Bloch, R. Howard, The Scandal of the Fabliaux, Chicago 1986.

Burke, Peter, Popular Culture in Early Modern Europe, 3rd edition, London 2009.

Chartier, Roger, The Cultural Uses of Print in Early Modern France, trans. Lydia G. Cochrane, Princeton 1987.

Duncan, Sarah, Mary I: Gender, Power and Ceremony in the Reign of England’s First Queen, New York 2012.

Evans, John, ‘Extracts from the Private Account Book of Sir William More of Loseley, Surrey in the Time of Queen Mary and Queen Elizabeth’, Archaeologia 36 (1856), pp. 284–31.

Flynn, Dennis, John Donne and the Ancient Catholic Nobility, Bloomington, Indiana 1995. 

Gramsci, Antonio, ‘Observations on Folklore’, in The Antonio Gramsci Reader: Selected Writings, 1916–1935, ed. David Forgacs, 2nd edition, London 1988, pp. 360–362.

Henderson, Judith Rice, ‘John Heywood’s “The Spider and the Flie”: Educating Queen and Country’, Studies in Philology 96 (1999), pp. 241–74.

Holstun, James, ‘The Spider, the Fly, and the Commonwealth: Merrie John Heywood and Agrarian Class Struggle’, ELH 71 (2004), pp. 53–88.

Hunt, Alice, ‘Marian Political Allegory: John Heywood’s The Spider and the Flie’, in The Oxford Handbook of Tudor Literature, 1485–1603, eds Mike Pincombe and Cathy Shrank, Oxford 2009, pp. 337–353.

Kahrl, Stanley, ‘Secular and Popular Piety in Medieval English Drama’, in The Popular Literature of Medieval England, ed. Thomas J. Heffernan, Tennessee Studies in Literature, 28, Knoxville 1985, pp. 85–107.

King, John N., Tudor Royal Iconography: Literature and Art in an Age of Religious Crisis, Prin- ceton 1984.

Land, Stephen K., Kett’s Rebellion: The Norfolk Rising of 1549, Ipswich 1977.

MacCulloch, Diarmaid, ‘Kett’s Rebellion in Context’, Past and Present 84 (1979), pp. 36–59.

Nykrog, Per, Les Fabliaux, Geneva 1973.

Reed, Arthur William, Early Tudor Drama: Medwall, the Rastells, Heywood, and the More Circle, London 1926.

Robison, William B., ‘More, Sir Christopher (b. in or before 1483, d. 1549), landowner and administrator’, Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Retrieved 19 Dec. 2021, from https://www-oxforddnb-com.ezproxy.is.ed.ac.uk/view/10.1093/ref:odnb/9780198614128.001.0001/odnb-780198614128-e-77080.

Russell, Rev. Frederick William, Kett’s Rebellion in Norfolk, London 1859.

Samson, Alexander, ‘Culture under Mary I and Philip’, in Birth of a Queen: Essays on the Quincentenary of Mary I, eds Sarah Duncan and Valerie Schutte, New York 2016, pp. 155–78.

Stenner, Rachel, The Typographic Imaginary in Early Modern English Literature, Abingdon 2018.

Walker, Greg, John Heywood: Comedy and Survival in the Sixteenth Century, Oxford 2020.

Walker, Greg, Writing Under Tyranny: English Literature and the Henrician Reformation, Oxford 2005.

Warner, J. Christopher, The Making and Marketing of Tottel’s Miscellany, 1557: Songs and Sonnets in the Summer of the Martyrs’ Fires, Farnham 2013.

Informacje

Informacje: Terminus, 2023, Tom 25, zeszyt 4 (69) 2023, s. 387 - 403

Typ artykułu: Oryginalny artykuł naukowy

Tytuły:

Angielski:

Unpopular Literature? John Heywood’s The Spider and the Flie

Polski:

Unpopular Literature? John Heywood’s The Spider and the Flie

Autorzy

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1276-6698

Greg Walker
Department of English Literature, University of Edinburgh
, Wielka Brytania
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1276-6698 Orcid
Wszystkie publikacje autora →

Department of English Literature, University of Edinburgh
Wielka Brytania

Publikacja: 21.12.2023

Status artykułu: Otwarte __T_UNLOCK

Licencja: CC BY  ikona licencji

Finansowanie artykułu:

This research received partial funding from a Una Europa network grant for which the author is very grateful.

Udział procentowy autorów:

Greg Walker (Autor) - 100%

Korekty artykułu:

-

Języki publikacji:

Angielski