FAQ

Coordinating Gender: What Can Coordinate Structure Agreement Tell Us about Gender?

Data publikacji: 19.04.2016

Studies in Polish Linguistics, Volume 11 (2016), Vol. 11, Issue 1, s. 1 - 25

https://doi.org/10.4467/23005920SPL.16.001.4816

Autorzy

Miloje Despić
Cornell University, Ithaca
Wszystkie publikacje autora →

Tytuły

Coordinating Gender: What Can Coordinate Structure Agreement Tell Us about Gender?

Abstrakt

This paper examines gender agreement with coordinate structures in Serbian, focusing exclusively on coordinate phrases with singular conjuncts. I discuss in detail four unexpected and challenging facts about coordinate structure gender agreement and provide a unified account of them. I argue that a participle or predicative adjective agreeing with a coordinate phrase takes the default masculine form either when the coordinate phrase contains conflicting gender information, which can sometimes surprisingly happen even when all conjuncts have identical gender specifications, or when at least one of the conjuncts is not marked for a gender value. On the bases of behavior of neuter, I also propose that gender in Serbian (and possibly other Slavic languages) should be represented in terms of binary features [±masculine] and [±feminine].

Bibliografia

Pobierz bibliografię

Begović Muamera, Aljović Nadira (2015). Accounting for agreement patterns in coordinate noun phrases with a shared modifier. In Slavic Languages in the Perspective of Formal Grammar: Proceedings of FDSL 10.5, Brno 2014, Markéta Ziková, Pavel Caha & Mojmír Dočekal (eds.), 39–59. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

Bobaljik Jonathan D. (2008). Missing persons: A case study in morphological universals. The Linguistic Review 25(1–2), 203–230.

Bobaljik Jonathan D. (to appear). Distributed morphology, Encyclopaedia chapter.

Bobaljik Jonathan D., Zocca Cynthia L. (2010). Gender markedness: the anatomy of a counter-example. Morphology 21(2), 141–166.

Bonet Eulàlia (1995). Feature structure of Romance clitics. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 13(4), 607–647.

Bošković Željko (2009). Unifying first and last conjunct agreement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 27(3), 455–496.

Calabrese Andrea (2005). Markedness and Economy in a Derivational Model of Phonology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Calabrese Andrea (2011). Investigations on markedeness, syncretism and zero exponence in morphology. Morphology 21(2), 283–325.

Carminati Maria, N. (2005). Processing reflexes of the feature hierarchy (person > number > gender) and implications for linguistic theory. Lingua 115(3), 259–285.

Corbett Greville (1991). Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Despić Miloje (2010). Markedness and marked features in Serbian. In Proceedings of the Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 18 (FASL 18): The Second Cornell Meeting, Wayles Browne, Adam Cooper, Alison Fisher, Esra Kesicie, Nikola Predolac, Draga Zec (eds.), 1–20. University of Michigan: Michigan Slavic Publications.

Despić Miloje (2013). A note on paucal, agreement and case. In Proceedings of the Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 20 (FASL 20): The Second MIT Meeting, Alexander Podobryaev (ed.), 57–72. University of Michigan: Michigan Slavic Publications.

Despić Miloje (2015). Investigations on mixed agreement: polite plurals, hybrid nouns and coordinate structures. Cornell: Manuscript.

Embick David (2000). Features, syntax, and categories in the Latin perfect. Linguistic Inquiry 31(2), 185–230.

Greenberg Joseph (1966). Language Universals, with Special Reference to Feature Hierarchies. The Hague: Mouton.

Harley Heidi, Ritter Elizabeth (2002). Person and number in pronouns: A feature-geometric analysis. Language 78(3), 482–526.

Halle Morris, Marantz Alec (1993). Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In The View from Building 20, Kenneth Hale, Jay S. Keyser (eds.), 111–176. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Ivić Milka (1963). Relationship of gender and number in Serbo-Croatian substantives. International Journal of Slavic Linguistics and Poetics 6, 51–57.

Ivić Milka (1966). Tipovi imeničkog roda u srpskohrvatskom književnom jeziku. Zbornik za filologiju i lingvistiku 9, 41–47.

Marušič Lanko, Nevins Andrew, Badecker William (2015). The grammars of conjunction agreement in Slovenian. Syntax 18(1), 39–77.

Mrazović Pavica, Vukadinović Zora (1990). Gramatika srpsko-hrvatskog jezika za strance. Novi Sad: Dobra Vest.

Nevins Andrew (2007). The representation of third person and its consequences for person-case effects. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25(2), 273–313.

Nevins Andrew (2011). Marked targets versus marked triggers and impoverishment of the dual. Linguistic Inquiry 42(3), 413–444.

Noyer Rolf (1997). Features, Positions and Affixes in Autonomous Morphological Structure. New York: Garland Publishing.

Silverstein Michael (1985). Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In Features and Projections, Pieter Muysken, Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), 163–233. Dordrecht: Foris.

Wechsler Stephen (2011). Mixed agreement, the person feature, and the index/concord distinction. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 29(4), 999–1031.

Wechsler Stephen, Hahm Hyun-Jong (2011). Polite plurals and adjective agreement. Morphology 21(2), 247–281.

Wechsler Stephen, Zlatić Larisa (2003). The Many Faces of Agreement. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.

Informacje

Informacje: Studies in Polish Linguistics, Volume 11 (2016), Vol. 11, Issue 1, s. 1 - 25

Typ artykułu: Oryginalny artykuł naukowy

Tytuły:

Angielski:

Coordinating Gender: What Can Coordinate Structure Agreement Tell Us about Gender?

Autorzy

Cornell University, Ithaca

Publikacja: 19.04.2016

Status artykułu: Otwarte __T_UNLOCK

Licencja: Żadna

Udział procentowy autorów:

Miloje Despić (Autor) - 100%

Korekty artykułu:

-

Języki publikacji:

Angielski