FAQ

A Critique of the Moral Optimism of Sam Harris. Polemical Comments

Data publikacji: 11.12.2014

Studia Religiologica, 2014, Tom 47, Numer 4, s. 321-329

https://doi.org/10.4467/20844077SR.14.024.3125

Autorzy

Konrad Szocik
Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie, Polska, ul. Gołębia 24, 31-007 Kraków
Wyższa Szkoła Informatyki i Zarządzania w Rzeszowie, mjr. Henryka Sucharskiego 2, Rzeszów
Wszystkie publikacje autora →

Tytuły

A Critique of the Moral Optimism of Sam Harris. Polemical Comments

Abstrakt

Sam Harris, one of the new atheists, believes that science is an authority in moral issues. Science can help us understand what our moral duties are, and what is right and wrong in a moral sense. However, the cultural and historical diversity of human behaviors, especially history of wars and conflicts, suggests that it is difficult to show one, common and universal kind of morality. Here we show that Harris’s moral theory is a particular project which could not be “scientifically” justifiable.

Bibliografia

Abelard P., Rozmowa pomiędzy filozofem, Żydem chrześcijaninem [Dialogue of Philosopher with Jew and Christian] [in:] P. Abelard, Rozprawy, transl. L. Joachimowicz, Warszawa 2001.

Atran S., Here He Goes Again: Sam Harris’s Falsehoods, http://www.thisviewoflife.com/index.php/magazine/articles/here-he-goes-again-sam-harriss-falsehoods [accessed: 01.11.2014].

Atran S., Ginges J., Religious and Sacred Imperatives in Human Conflict, “Science” 2012, vol. 336, no. 6083, pp. 855–857.

Beld T. van den, The Morality System with and without God, “Ethical Theory and Moral Practice” 2001, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 383–399.

Brosnan S.F., Waal F.B.M. de, Evolution of responses to (un)fairness, “Science” 2014, vol. 346, no. 6207, doi:10.1126/science.1251776 [accessed: 20.10.2014].

Consolidated Version of the Treaty on European Union, Preamble, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv:OJ.C_.2012.326.01.0001.01.ENG [accessed: 02.06.2014].

Craig W.L., Five Reasons God Exists [in:] W.L. Craig, W. Sinnott-Armstrong, God? Debate between Christian and an Atheist, Oxford 2004, pp. 3–30.

Gibbons A., How We Tamed Ourselves – and Became Modern, “Science” 2014, vol. 346, no. 6208, pp.405–406.

Ginges J., Atran S., War as Moral Imperative (Not Just Practical Politics by Other Means), “Proceedings of the Royal Society. Biological Sciences,” http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/early/2011/02/08/rspb.2010.2384, doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.2384 [accessed: 18.10.2014].

Harris S., The End of Faith. Religion, Terror and the Future of Reason, New York–London 2004.

Harris S., The Moral Landscape. How Science Can Determine Human Values, New York 2010.

Mannheim K., Ideologia utopia [Ideology and Utopia], transl. J. Miziński, Lublin 1992.

Nagel T., What is it like to be Bat?, “Philosophical Review” 1974, no. 83, pp. 435–450.

Nietzsche F., genealogii moralności [The Genealogy of Morals], transl. G. Sowinski, Kraków 1997.

Piazza J., Sousa P., Religiosity, Political Orientation, and Consequentialist Moral Thinking, “Social Psychological and Personality Science” 2014, no. 5 (3), pp. 334–342.

Sam Harris vs William Lane Craig – The God Debate II, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nebLvSnS-nc [accessed: 08.06.2014], 38:00.

J.B. Silk, Animal Behaviour: The Evolutionary Roots of Lethal Conflict, “Nature” 2014, no. 513, pp. 321–322.

Walters K., Guides for the Perplexed: Atheism, London 2010.

M.L. Wilson et al., Lethal Aggression in Pan is better explained by adaptive strategies than human impacts, “Nature” 2014, vol. 513, pp. 414–417.

Wolin R., The Seduction of Unreason. The Intellectual Romance with Fascism. From Nietzsche to Postmodernism, Princeton–Oxford 2004.

A.G. Zavaliy, Saving Morality: Case against Moral Neutralism, “Studia Humana” 2012, vol.1/2, p. 40–52.

Informacje

Informacje: Studia Religiologica, 2014, Tom 47, Numer 4, s. 321-329

Typ artykułu: Oryginalny artykuł naukowy

Tytuły:

Polski:

A Critique of the Moral Optimism of Sam Harris. Polemical Comments

Angielski:

A Critique of the Moral Optimism of Sam Harris. Polemical Comments

Autorzy

Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie, Polska, ul. Gołębia 24, 31-007 Kraków

Wyższa Szkoła Informatyki i Zarządzania w Rzeszowie, mjr. Henryka Sucharskiego 2, Rzeszów

Publikacja: 11.12.2014

Status artykułu: Otwarte __T_UNLOCK

Licencja: Żadna

Udział procentowy autorów:

Konrad Szocik (Autor) - 100%

Korekty artykułu:

-

Języki publikacji:

Angielski