W poszukiwaniu istoty empatii. Wnioski z przeglądu badań neuronaukowych i ich praktyczne implikacje
cytuj
pobierz pliki
RIS BIB ENDNOTEWybierz format
RIS BIB ENDNOTEW poszukiwaniu istoty empatii. Wnioski z przeglądu badań neuronaukowych i ich praktyczne implikacje
Data publikacji: 16.03.2017
Rocznik Kognitywistyczny, 2016, Tom 9, s. 51 - 58
https://doi.org/10.4467/20843895RK.16.005.6411Autorzy
W poszukiwaniu istoty empatii. Wnioski z przeglądu badań neuronaukowych i ich praktyczne implikacje
The essence of empathy: a review of the neuroscience research and its applications
Empathy, subjected to personal differences, is a key to a functional social life. In recent years neuroscience has contributed to the precise terminology and methodological approach in the research of empathy, mainly due to development of non-invasive brain imaging techniques. The article presents a literature review and aims to determine the areas of neuroscience which help to understand empathy. Attention is drawn to role of the research in determining parts of brain responsible for different types of empathy (cognitive and emotional). The research also shows that there are modulators of emphatic response and hence practical applications of knowledge may be possible in the therapy of maladaptive forms of empathy (e.g. personal distress).
Adolphs, R. (2003). Cognitive neuroscience of human social behaviour. Nature Reviews. Neuro-science, 4(3), 165–78.
Baron-Cohen, S. (2014). Teoria zła. O empatii i genezie okrucieństwa. Sopot: Smak Słów.
Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A.M., Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”? Cognition, 21, 37–46.
Batson, C.D., Fultz, J., Schoenrade, P.A. (1987). Distress and empathy: two qualitatively distinct vicarious emotions with different motivational consequences. Journal of Personality, 55 (March), 19–39.
Bavelas, J.B., Black, A., Lemery, C.R., Mullett, J. (1986). “I show how you feel”: Motor mimicry as a communicative act. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(2), 322–329.
Botvinick, M., Jha, A.P., Bylsma, L.M., Fabian, S.A, Solomon, P.E., Prkachin, K.M. (2005). Viewing facial expressions of pain engages cortical areas involved in the direct experience of pain. NeuroImage, 25, 312–319.
Brodmann, K. (1909). Vergleichende Lokalisationslehre der Gro_hirnrinde. Leipzig, Germany: Johann Ambrosius Barth Verlag. Przekład angielski: Garey L.J. (2006). Localisation in the Cere-bral Cortex. New York: Springer.
Chartrand, T.L., Bargh, J.A. (1999). The chameleon effect: the perception-behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 893–910.
de Vignemont, F., Singer, T. (2006). The empathic brain: how, when and why? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(10), 435–441.
Decety, J., Lamm, C. (2006). Human empathy through the lens of social neuroscience. The Scientific World Journal, 6, 1146–1163.
Decety, J., Lamm, C. (2009). Empathy versus personal distress – recent evidence from social neuroscience. W: J. Decety, W. Ickes (Eds.), The Social Neuroscience of Empathy (s. 199–213). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Decety, J., Michalska, K.J. (2010). Neurodevelopmental changes in the circuits underlying empathy and sympathy from childhood to adulthood. Developmental Science, 13, 886–899.
Decety, J., Yang, C.Y., Cheng, Y. (2010). Physicians down-regulate their pain empathy response: An event-related brain potential study. NeuroImage, 50(4), 1676–1682.
Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R.A., Murphy, B., Karbon, M., Maszk, P., Smith, M., … Suh, K. (1994). The relations of emotionality and regulation to dispositional and situational empathy-related responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 776–797.
Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R.A., Spinrad, T.L. (2006). Prosocial behavior. W: N. Eisenberg (Vol. Ed.), W. Damon, R.M. Lerner (series eds.), Handbook of Child Psychology, Vol. 3: Social, emotional, and personality development (s. 646–718). New York: Wiley.
Gu, X., Han, S. (2007). Attention and reality constraints on the neural processes of empathy for pain. NeuroImage, 36, 256–267.
Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J., Rapson, R. (1994). Emotional contagion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hein, G., Singer, T. (2008). I feel how you feel but not always: the empathic brain and its modulation. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 18, 153–158.
Hoffman, M. (2006). Empatia i rozwój moralny. Gdańsk: GWP.
Hoffman, M.L. (2000). Empathy, its arousal, and prosocial functioning. W: M.L. Hoffman, Empathy and Moral Development: Implications for Caring and Justice (s. 29–62). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Howe, D. (2013). Empatia. Co to jest i dlaczego jest taka ważna. Warszawa: Oficyna Ingenium.
Klimecki, O.M., Leiberg, S., Ricard, M., Singer, T. (2014). Differential pattern of functional brain plasticity after compassion and empathy training. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9, 873–879.
Lamm, C., Batson, C.D., Decety, J. (2007). The neural substrate of human empathy: Effects of perspective-taking and cognitive appraisal. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 42–58.
Leiberg, S., Klimecki, O., Singer, T. (2011). Short-term compassion training increases prosocial behavior in a newly developed prosocial game. PLoS ONE, 6(3).
Lewis, M., Brooks-Gunn, J. (1979). Social Cognition and the Acquisition of Self. New York: Plenum Press.
Lipps, T. (1903). Einfühlung, Inner Nachahmung, und Organempfindaungen. Archiv für gestame Psychologie, 1, 465–519. Przekład angielski: Empathy, inner imitation and sense-feelings.
W: M. Rader (ed.) (1979), A Modern Book of Aesthetics. New York: Holt, Rinehart, Winston.
Meltzoff, A.N., Moore, M.K. (1983). Newborn infants imitate adult facial gestures. Child Development, 54, 702–709.
Morrison, I., Lloyd, D., di Pellegrino, G., Roberts, N. (2004). Vicarious responses to pain in anterior cingulate cortex: Is empathy a multisensory issue? Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 4(2), 270–278.
Mukamel, R., Ekstrom, A.D., Kaplan, J., Iacoboni, M., Fried, I. (2010). Single-neuron responses in humans during execution and observation of actions. Current Biology, 20(8), 750–756.
Pinel, P. (1801). Abhandlung über Geisteverirrunger oder Manie. Wien, Austria: Carl Schanmberg.
Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Gallese, V., Fogassi, L. (1996). Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Cognitive Brain Research, 3(2), 131–141.
Saarela, M.V., Hlushchuk, Y., Williams, A.C., Schürmann, M., Kalso, E., Hari, R. (2007). The compassionate brain: Humans detect intensity of pain from another’s face. Cerebral Cortex, 17 (January), 230–237.
Scott, R.M., Baillargeon, R. (2009). Which penguin is this? Attributing false beliefs about object identity at 18 months. Child Development, 80, 1172–1196.
Shamay-Tsoory, S.G. (2009). Empathic processing: Its cognitive and affective dimensions and neuroanatomical basis. W: J. Decety, W. Ickes (eds.), The Social Neuroscience of Empathy
(s. 215–232). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Shamay-Tsoory, S.G. (2011). The neural bases for empathy. The Neuroscientist: A Review Journal Bringing Neurobiology, Neurology and Psychiatry, 17, 18–24.
Shamay-Tsoory, S.G., Aharon-Peretz, J., Perry, D. (2009). Two systems for empathy: A double dissociation between emotional and cognitive empathy in inferior frontal gyrus versus ventromedial prefrontal lesions. Brain, 132(2008), 617–627.
Singer, T., Seymour, B., O’Doherty, J., Kaube, H., Dolan, R.J., Frith, C.D. (2004). Empathy for pain involves the affective but not sensory components of pain. Science (New York, N.Y.), 303, 1157–1162.
Singer, T., Seymour, B., O’Doherty, J.P., Stephan, K.E., Dolan, R.J., Frith, C.D. (2006). Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others. Nature, 439 (January), 466–469.
Tice, D.M., Bratslavsky, E., Baumeister, R.F. (2001). Emotional distress regulation takes precedence over impulse control: If you feel bad, do it! Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(1), 53–67.
Tomasello, M. (2002). Kulturowe źródła ludzkiego poznawania. Warszawa: Państwowy Instytut Wydawniczy.
Vischer, R. (1873/1994). On the optical sense of form: A contribution to aesthetics. W: H.F. Mallgrave (ed.). Empathy, Form and Space. Los Angeles: Getty Center for the History of Art and the Humanities.
Wimmer, H., Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition, 13, 103–128.
Informacje: Rocznik Kognitywistyczny, 2016, Tom 9, s. 51 - 58
Typ artykułu: Oryginalny artykuł naukowy
Tytuły:
W poszukiwaniu istoty empatii. Wnioski z przeglądu badań neuronaukowych i ich praktyczne implikacje
The essence of empathy: a review of the neuroscience research and its applications
Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie, Polska, ul. Gołębia 24, 31-007 Kraków
Publikacja: 16.03.2017
Status artykułu: Otwarte
Licencja: Żadna
Udział procentowy autorów:
Korekty artykułu:
-Języki publikacji:
PolskiLiczba wyświetleń: 3157
Liczba pobrań: 1726