Rocznik Kognitywistyczny

Adaptation to different types of cognitive conflict. Are there common mechanisms?

Data publikacji: 16.11.2015

Rocznik Kognitywistyczny, 2015, Tom 8, s. 55 - 65



Marta Siedlecka
Instytut Psychologii, Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie, ul. Ingardena 6, 30-060 Kraków
Wszystkie publikacje autora →
Kamila Śmigasiewicz
Department of Neurology, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160 23538 Lübeck, Germany
Wszystkie publikacje autora →


One of the functions of cognitive control is to detect difficulties in information processing and adjust the level of performance. This article presents study on confl ict adaptation in which we investigated how detection of cognitive conflict influences behaviour on a subsequent trial. In two experiments we aimed to find out whether the adjustment can be carried out across two kinds of cognitive conflicts: between competing responses and requirements of two tasks. The modified version of the flanker task in switching paradigm was used so that participants had to switch between two tasks that shared the same stimulus set. The results showed that the two kinds of confl icts did not interact with each other. Furthermore, each conflict evoked conflict adaptation, but this adaptation did not occurred across conflicts. This suggests that conflict adaptation covers a set of mechanisms functioning uniquely in one domain.


Akçay Ç., Hazeltine E. (2008). Conflict adaptation and task structure. „Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance” 34 (4), pp. 958–973.

Blais Ch., Ribidoux S., Risko F., Besner D. (2007). Item-specific adaptation and the conflict monitoring hypothesis: A computational model. „Psychological Review” 114 (4), pp. 1076–1086.

Baddeley A.D., Hitch G. (1974). Working memory. „Psychology of Learning and Motivation” 8, pp. 47–89.

Botvinick M.M., Braver T.S., Barch D.M., Carter C.S., Cohen J.D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. „Psychological Review” 108 (3), pp. 624–652.

Botvinick M., Nystrom L., Fissell K., Cameron C., Cohen J. (1999). Conflict monitoring versus selection for action in anterior cingulate cortex. „Nature” 402, pp. 179–180. 64

Bush G., Luu P., Posner M.I. (2000). Cognitive and emotional influences in anterior cingulate cortex. „Trends in Cognitive Sciences” 4 (6), pp. 215–222.

Carter C.S., Braver T.S., Barch D.M., Botvinick M.M., Noll D., Cohen J.D. (1998). Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and online monitoring of performance. „Science” 280, pp. 747–749.

Chuderski A., Nęcka E. (2010). Intelligence and cognitive control. In: A. Gruszka, G. Matthews, B. Szymura (eds.), Handbook of Individual Differences in Cognition. New York: Springer, pp. 263–282.

De Jong R., Liang C.C., Lauber E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dualprocess model of effects of spatial stimulus response correspondence. „Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance” 20, pp. 731–750.

Egner T. (2008). Multiple conflict-driven control mechanisms in the human brain. „Trends in Cognitive Sciences” 12 (10), pp. 374‒380.

Egner T., Delano M., Hirsch J. (2007). Separate conflict-specific cognitive control mechanisms in the human brain. „Neuroimage” 35 (2), pp. 940–948.

Eriksen B.A., Eriksen C.W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identifi cation of a target letter in a nonsearch task. „Perception & Psychophysics” 16 (1), pp. 143–149.

Freitas A., Bahar M., Yang S., Banai R. (2007). Contextual adjustments in cognitive control across tasks. „Research Report” 18, pp. 1040–1043.

Funes M.J., Lupiáñez J., Humphreys G. (2010). Analyzing the generality of conflict adaptation effects. „Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance” 36 (1), pp. 147‒161.

Gratton G., Coles M.G.H., Donchin E. (1992). Optimizing the use of information: Strategic control of activation of responses. „Journal of Experimental Psychology: General” 121 (4), pp. 480–506.

Jacoby L., Lindsay D.S., Hessels S. (2003). Item-specific control of automatic processes: Stroop process dissociation. „Psychonomic Bulletin & Review” 10 (3), pp. 638–644.

Kerns J.G., Cohen J.D., MacDonald A.W., Cho R.Y., Stenger V.A., Carter C.S. (2004). Anterior cingulate conflict monitoring and adjustments in control. „Science” 303, pp. 1023–1026.

Kiesel A., Kunde W., Hoffman J. (2006). Evidence for task-specific resolution of response conflict. „Psychonomic Bulletin and Review” 13, pp. 800–806.

Kim C., Chung C., Kim J. (2013). Task-dependent response conflict monitoring and cognitive control in anterior cingulate and dorsolateral prefrontal cortices. „Brain Research” 1537, pp. 216–223.

Kornblum S., Hasbroucq T., Osman A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulusresponse compatibility. A model and taxonomy. „Psychological Review” 97, pp. 253–270.

Kunde W., Wühr P. (2006). Sequential modulations of correspondence effects across spatial dimensions and tasks. „Memory & Cognition” 34, pp. 356–367.

Liston C., Matalon S., Hare T.A., Davidson M.C., Casey B.J. (2006). Anterior cingulate and posterior parietal cortices are sensitive to dissociable forms of conflict in a task-switching paradigm. „Neuron” 50, pp. 643–653.

Liu X., Banich M.T., Jacobson B.L., Tanabe J.L. (2004). Common and distinct neural substrates of attentional control in an integrated Simon and spatial Stroop task as assessed by event-related fMRI. „NeuroImage” 22, pp. 1097‒1106.

Logan G.D. (2003). Executive control of thought and action. In search of the wild homunculus. „Current Directions in Psychological Science” 12 (2), pp. 45‒48.

MacDonald A.W., Cohen J.D., Stenger V.A., Carter C.S. (2000). Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control. „Science” 288, pp. 1835‒1838.

Miyake A., Friedman N.P., Emerson M.J., Witzki A.H., Howerter A., Wager T.D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. „Cognitive Psychology” 41 (1), pp. 49−100.

Monsell S., Driver J. (2000). Banishing the control homunculus. In: S. Monsell, J. Driver (eds.), Control of Cognitive Processes: Attention and Performance XVIII. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 3–32.

Adaptation to different types of cognitive conflict. Are there common mechanisms? Monsell S., Taylor T.J., Murphy K. (2001). Naming the color of a word: Is it responses or task sets that compete? „Memory & Cognition” 29 (1), pp. 137‒151.

Monsell S. (2003). Task switching. „Trends in Cognitive Sciences” 7 (3), pp. 134‒140.

Nieuwenhuis S., Yeung N. (2005). Neural mechanisms of attention and control: Losing our inhibitions? „Nature Neuroscience” 8 (12), pp. 1631‒1633.

Nobre A.C. (2001). The attentive homunculus: Now you see it, now you don’t. „Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews” 25 (6), pp. 477‒496.

Notebaert W., Soetens E., Melis A. (2001). Sequential analysis of a Simon task – evidence for an attention-shift account. „Psychological Research” 65, pp. 170–184.

Notebaert W., Verguts T. (2008). Cognitive control acts locally. „Cognition” 106 (2), pp. 1071‒1080.

Salthouse T.A., Atkinson T.M., Berish D.E. (2003). Executive functioning as a potential mediator of age-related cognitive decline in normal adults. „Journal of Experimental Psychology: General” 132 (4), p. 566‒594.

Simon J.R. (1969). Reactions towards the source of stimulation. „Journal of Experimental Psychology” 81, pp. 174‒176.

Steinhauser M., Hübner R. (2009). Distinguishing response confl ict and task confl ict in the Stroop task: Evidence from ex-Gaussian distribution analysis. „Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance” 35 (5), pp. 1398‒1412.

Stürmer B., Leuthold H. (2003). Control over response priming in visuomotor processing: A lateralized event-related potential study. „Experimental Brain Research” 153 (1), pp. 35‒44.

Stürmer B., Leuthold H., Soetens E., Schröter H., Sommer W. (2002). Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. „Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance” 28, pp. 1345‒1363.

van Veen V., Carter C.S. (2006). Conflict and cognitive control in the brain. „Current Directions in Psychological Science” 15 (5), pp. 237‒240.

Wühr P., Kunde W. (2008). Precuing spatial S-R correspondence: Is there regulation of expected response conflict? „Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance” 34 (4), pp. 872‒883.

Zhang H.Z.H., Zhang J., Kornblum S. (1999). A parallel distributed processing model of stimulus-stimulus and stimulus-response compatibility. „Cognitive Psychology” 38 (3), pp. 384‒432.

Zorzi M., Umilta,C. (1995). A computational model of the Simon effect. „Psychological Research” 58 (3), pp. 193‒205.


Informacje: Rocznik Kognitywistyczny, 2015, s. 55 - 65

Typ artykułu: Oryginalny artykuł naukowy



Adaptation to different types of cognitive conflict. Are there common mechanisms?


Instytut Psychologii, Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie, ul. Ingardena 6, 30-060 Kraków

Department of Neurology, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160 23538 Lübeck, Germany

Publikacja: 16.11.2015

Status artykułu: Otwarte __T_UNLOCK

Licencja: Żadna

Udział procentowy autorów:

Marta Siedlecka (Autor) - 50%
Kamila Śmigasiewicz (Autor) - 50%

Korekty artykułu:


Języki publikacji:


Liczba wyświetleń: 2201

Liczba pobrań: 1253