Coleman Jules. 2001. The Practice of Principle: In Defence of a Pragmatist Approach to Legal Theory. 292. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dickson Julie. 2001. Evaluation and Legal Theory, Oxford: Hart Publishing.

Dummett Michael. 1986. „A Nice Derengment of Epitaphs: Some Comments on Davidson and Hacking” [w:] LePore Ernest (red.). Truth and Interpretation: Perspectives on Philosophy of Donald Davidson.464. Cambridge: Blackwell.

Dworkin Ronald. 1986. Law’s Empire. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Dworkin Ronald. 2006. Justice in Robes. 114, 192-94, 231. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Dyrda Adam. 2013. „Czy pojęcie prawa jest pojęciem z istoty spornym?”. Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej 1(6): 54-67.

Dyrda Adam. 2013. Konwencja u podstaw prawa. Kontrowersje współczesnego pozytywizmu prawniczego, Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer.

Elgin Catherine Z. 2010. „Persistent Disagreement”. [w:] Feldman Richard & Warfield Ted (red.) Disagreement. 53-67. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Feldman Richard. 2006. „Epistemological Puzzles about Disagreement,” [w:] Hetherington Stephen (red.). Epistemology Futures. 216-236. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Finnis John. 1980. Natural Law and Natural Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Fuller Lon L. 2004. Moralność prawa. Przeł. Amsterdamski Stefan. Warszawa: Dom Wydawniczy ABC.

Fumerton Richard. 2010. “You Can’t Trust A Philosopher” [w:] Feldman Richard & Warfield Ted (red.) Disagreement. 91-110. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Goldman Alvin. 2010. „Epistemic Relativism and Reasonable Disagreement ”. [w:] Feldman Richard & Warfield Ted (red.). Disagreement. 187-215. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Goodman Robert F. 1995. „William James: Rationality as Pragmatic Choice ”, History of European Ideas 20 (4-6): 951-955.

Green Leslie. 1987. „The Political Content of Legal Theory”. Philosophy and Social Sciences 17: 16–20

Grice Paul 1989. Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Halpin Andrew. 2001. Reasoning with Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing.

Halpin Andrew. 2010. „Methodology” [w:] Patterson Denis (red.). A Companion to Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory, 2nd ed. 607-620. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Hart Herbert L.A. 1994. The Concept of Law. 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hawthorne John & Srinivasan Amia. 2013. “Disagreement without transparency: Some Bleak Thoughts” [w:] Christensen David & Lackey Jennifer (red). The Epistemology of Disagreement New Essays. 9-30. New York: Oxford University Press.

Himma Kenneth. 2002. „Ambigously Stung: Dworkin’s Semantic Sting Reconfigured”, Legal Theory 2: 160–162.

Jackson Frank. 1998. From Metaphysics to Ethics: A Defence of Conceptual Analysis. Oxford Oxford University Press.

James William. 1897. The Will to Believe and Other Eassys in Popular Philosophy. New York: Longmans, Green, and Co.

Kamela Paweł. 2008. Prawo i moralnoœść w koncepcjach H.L.A. Harta. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek

Leiter Brian. 2013. „The Demarcation Problem in Jurisprudence: A Case for Scepticism” [w:] Beltran Jordi F., Moreso Jose J., Papayannis Diego M. (red.). Neutrality and Theory of Law. 161-174. Dordrecht: Springer.

Leiter Brian. 2013. „Why Legal Positivism (Again)?”, Chicago Public Law and Legal Theory Working Paper no. 442, online: http://www.law.uchicago.edu/files/file/442-bl-why-again.pdf

Marmor Andrei. 2005. Interpretation and Legal Theory. Oxford and Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing.

Marmor Andrei. 2006. „Legal Positivism: Still Descriptive and Morally Neutral”, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 26 (4): 683-704.

Moore Michael. 2012. „The Various Relations between Law and Morality in Contemporary Legal Philosophy”. Ratio Juris 25 (4): 435-471.

Murphy Liam. 2001. „The Political Question of the Concept of Law” [w:] Coleman Jules (red.). Hart’s Postscript: Essays on the Postscript to The Concept of Law. 371. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Oberdiek John, Patterson Denis. 2007. „Moral Evaluation and Conceptual Analysis in Jurisprudential Methodology” [w:] Freeman Michael & Harrison Ross (red.). Law and Philosophy. 60-75. New York : Oxford University Press.

Perry Stephen. 1995. „Interpretation and Methodology in Legal Theory” (w:) Marmor Andrei (red.). Law and Interpretation: Essays in Legal Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Posłajko Krzysztof. 2012. To wszystko nic nie znaczy. Faktualizm i nonfaktualizm w kwestii znaczenia. Warszawa: Oœrodek Badań Filozoficznych

Raz Joseph. 1994., Ethics in the Public Domain: Essays in the Morality of Law and Politics. 237. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Raz Joseph. 1998. „Postema on Law’s Autonomy and Public Practical Reasons: A Critical Comment”. 4 Legal Theory 1: 5-18.

Raz Joseph. 2001. „Two Views of the Nature of the Theory of Law: A Partial Comparison” [w:] Coleman Jules (red.). Hart’s Postscript: Essays on the Postscript to the Concept of Law. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Sunstein Cass S., Vermeule Adrian. 2002. „Interpretation and Institutions ”. Chicago J.M. Olin Law & Economics Working Paper No. 156 2nd series. Online: http://www.law.uchicago.edu/files/files/156.crsav.interpretation.pdf.

Van Inwagen Peter. 2009. „Zawsze, wszędzie i bez względu na osobę niesłusznie jest żywić przekonania oparte na niedostatecznym śœwiadectwie”, Roczniki Filozoficzne Tom LVII, numer 2. Przeł. J. K. Teske: 173-192.

Waldron Jeremy. 2001. „Normative (or Ethical) Positivism” [w:] Hart’s Postscript: Essays on the Postscript to the Concept of Law. 410-434. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Waldron Jeremy. 2002. „Is the rule of law an essentially contested concept (in Florida)?”. Law and Philosophy. 21: 148-149.

Williamson Timothy. 2000. Knowledge and It’s Limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Winch Peter. 1995. Idea nauki o społeczeñstwie i jej związki z filozofią. Przeł. Chwedeńczuk Bohdan. Warszawa: Oficyna Naukowa.