FAQ
Logo Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie

Social Innovation Living Lab as a Methodology for Conceptual Design Research

Data publikacji: 11.2019

International Journal of Contemporary Management, 2019, Numer 18 (3), s. 7 - 25

https://doi.org/10.4467/24498939IJCM.19.008.11751

Autorzy

Grzegorz Baran
Jagiellonian University, The Faculty of Management and Social Communication, Łojasiewicza 4, Kraków 30-348, Poland
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2480-8058 Orcid
Wszystkie publikacje autora →

Tytuły

Social Innovation Living Lab as a Methodology for Conceptual Design Research

Abstrakt

Background. Given the specificity and importance of social innovation as the processes of converting novel ideas and solutions of crucial social problems into value for society, they cannot be research and designed if taken out from real‑life environment. A living lab approach has become a promising methodology for social innovation research and design, wich offer means of developing and testing innovations in co‑creation with users and other stakeholders in real‑life settings.

Research aims. Given that a living lab is above all a research and design methodology, this research study is aimed at developing the inquiry processes on which the functioning of a social innovation living laboratory is based and which are the basis of conceptual design research framework.

Methodology. This research study was realized with conceptual research, wherein the existing knowledge was used as a source of reasoning leading to solve the scientific problem. The observing and analyzing existing information on cognitive processes occurring within living laboratories and their interpretation in the light of knowledge about the processes of creating social innovations led to solve the scientific problem.

Key findings. The original conceptual design research framework for a social innovation living lab understood as a research and design methodology. Proposed research framework enables to combine existing knowledge with the experiences from its application for theory testing and further development.

JEL Codes: O3, M1, L2

Bibliografia

Baran, G. (2013). Marketing współtworzenia wartości z klientem: społecznotwórcza rola marketingu w procesie strukturacji interakcyjnego środowiska doświadczeń. Kraków: Instytut Spraw Publicznych Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.

Baran, G. (2018). Design‑led approach to social innovation. Przedsiębiorczość i Zarządzanie, 19(9), vol. 3, 467–482.

Bason, C. (2010). Leading Public Sector Innovation: Co‑creating for a Better Society. Bristol: Policy Press.

Bekkers, V. J. J. M., Tummers, L. G. & Voorberg, W. H. (2013). From Public Innovation to Social Innovation in the Public Sector: A Literature Review of Relevant Drivers and Barriers. Rotterdam: Erasmus University Rotterdam.

Bergman, N., Markusson, N., Connor, P., Middlemiss, L. & Ricci, M. (2010). Bottom‑up, social innovation for addressing climate change. In: Energy Transitions in an Interdependent World: What and Where Are the Future Social Science Research Agendas, Sussex, 25–26 February.

Bergvall‑Kåreborn, B., Ihlström Eriksson, C., Ståhlbröst, A. & Svensson, J. (2009). A Milieu for innovation: Defining living labs. In: 2nd ISPIM Innovation Symposium, New York City, USA, 6–9 December 2009 (p. 12). ISPIM.

Bijl‑Brouwer, M. van der, Kaldor, L., Watson, R. & Hillen, V. (2015). Supporting the Emerging Practice of Public Sector Design Innovation. IASDR 2015 Interplay, Brisbane, Australia.

Borzaga, C. & Bodini, R. (2014). What to make of social innovation? Towards a framework for policy development. Social Policy and Society, 13(3), 411–421.

Brown, T. (2016). Zmiana przez design: Jak Design Thinking zmienia organizacje i pobudza innowacyjność. Wrocław: Instytut Dziennikarstwa i Komunikacji Społecznej Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego.

Cajaiba‑Santana, G. (2014). Social innovation: Moving the field forward. A conceptual framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 82, 42–51.

Caulier‑Grice, J., Davies, A., Patrick, R. & Norman, W. (2012). Defining social innovation. A deliverable of the project: “The theoretical, empirical and policy foundations for building social innovation in Europe” (TEPSIE), European Commission – 7th Framework Programme. Brussels: European Commission, DG Research.

Coorevits, L., Georges, A. & Schuurman, D. (2018). A framework for field testing in living lab innovation projects. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(12).

Cross, N. (2011). Design Thinking: Understanding how Designers Think and Work. Oxford: Berg.

Dekker, R., Franco Contreras, J. & Meijer, A. (2019). The living lab as a methodology for public administration research: A systematic literature review of its applications in the social sciences. International Journal of Public Administration, 1–11.

Dorst, K. (2010). The nature of design thinking. In: Design Thinking Research Symposium. Sydney: DAB Documents, University of Technology.

Dorst, K. (2011). The core of “design thinking” and its application. Design Studies, 32(6), 521–532.

Dorst, K. & Cross, N. (2001). Creativity in the design process: Co‑evolution of problem–solution. Design Studies, 22(5), 425–437.

Dzbor, M. & Zdrahal, Z. (2002). Design as interactions of problem framing and problem solving. In: Proceedings 15th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI), 21–26 Jul. 2002, Lyon, France.

Ehn, P. (2008). Participation in design things. In: Proceedings of the Tenth Anniversary Conference on Participatory Design 2008 (pp. 92–101). Indiana University.

Eriksson, M., Niitamo, V. P., & Kulkki, S. (2005). State‑of‑the‑art in Utilizing Living Labs Approach to User‑centric Act Innovation: A European Approach. Lulea: Center for Distance‑spanning Technology. Lulea University of Technology.

European Commission (2019). Social Innovation. https://ec.europa.eu/growth/industry/innovation/policy/social_en (accessed: 20th November 2019).

Følstad, A. (2008). Living labs for innovation and development of information and communication technology: A literature review. The Electronic Journal for Virtual Organizations and Networks, 10 (Special on Living Labs), 100–131.

Gawer, A. & Cusumano, M. A. (2014). Industry platforms and ecosystem innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(3), 417–433.

Hillgren, P. A. (2013). Participatory design for social and public innovation: Living labs as spaces for agonistic experiments and friendly hacking. Public and Collaborative: Exploring the Intersection of Design, Social Innovation and Public Policy, 75–88.

Howaldt, J. & Schwarz, M. (2010). Social Innovation: Concepts, Research Fields and International Trends. Aachen: Aachen University.

Ionescu, C. (2015). About the conceptualization of social innovation. Theoretical and Applied Economics, 22(3), 53–62.

Jackson, D.J. (2011). What is an Innovation Ecosystem? Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.

Kelley, T. & Littmann, J. (2001). The Art of Innovation. Currency and Doubleday. New York: Random House.

Kelley, D. & Kelley, T. (2015). Twórcza odwaga. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo MT Biznes.

Keyson, D., Guerra‑Santin, O. & Lockton, D. (2017). Living Labs. Cham: Springer.

Klimowicz, M. (2015). Żywe Laboratoria jako innowacyjne narzędzie zarządzania miastami. In: A. Wiktorska‑Święcka (ed.), (Re)organizacja w zarządzaniu miastami w Polsce w kontekście wyzwań rozwojowych (pp. 186–197). Wrocław: Oficyna Wydawnicza ATUT.

Kwaśnicki, W. (2015). Innowacje społeczne – nowy paradygmat czy kolejny etap w rozwoju kreatywności człowieka? In: W. Misztal, G. Chimiak & A. Kościański (eds.), Obywatelskość wobec kryzysu: uśpieni czy innowatorzy? (pp. 1–23). Warszawa: Instytut Filozofii i Socjologii PAN, http://kwasnicki.prawo.uni.wroc.pl/todownload/Innowacje SpoleczneWK.pdf (accessed: 6th October 2018).

Leminen, S., Westerlund, M. & Nyström, A. G. (2012). Living labs as open‑innovation networks. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(9).

Manzini, E. (2014). Making things happen: Social innovation and design. Design Issues, 30(1), 57–66.

Mulgan, G. (2006). The process of social innovation. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 1(2), 145–162.

Mumford, M. D. (2002). Social innovation: Ten cases from Benjamin Franklin. Creativity Research Journal, 14(2), 253–266.

Murray, R., Caulier‑Grice, J. & Mulgan, G. (2010). The Open Book of Social Innovation. London: National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts.

Neumeier, S. (2012). Why do social innovations in rural development matter and should they be considered more seriously in rural development research? Proposal for a stronger focus on social innovations in rural development research. Sociologia Ruralis, 52(1), 48–69.

OECD (2011). Fostering Innovation to Address Social Challenges. Workshop proceedings. Paris.

Olejniczuk‑Merta, A. (2013). Innowacje społeczne. Konsumpcja i Rozwój, 1(4), 21–34.

Pol, E. & Ville, S. (2009). Social innovation: Buzz word or enduring term? The Journal of Socio‑economics, 38(6), 878–885.

Rohrbeck, R., Hölzle, K. & Gemünden, H. G. (2009). Opening up for competitive advantage – How Deutsche Telekom creates an open innovation ecosystem. R&D Management, 39(4), 420–430.

Romero Herrera, N. (2017). The emergence of living lab methods. In: D. Keyson, O. Guerra‑Santin & D. Lockton (eds.), Living Labs. Cham: Springer.

Schuurman, D., De Marez, L. & Ballon, P. (2016). The impact of living lab methodology on open innovation contributions and outcomes. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(1).

Steward, F., Liff, S., Dunkelman, M. (2009), Mapping the Big Green Challenge. NESTA Research Report, London.

Veeckman, C., Schuurman, D., Leminen, S. & Westerlund, M. (2013). Linking living lab characteristics and their outcomes: Towards a conceptual framework. Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(12), 6–15.

Von Hippel, E. & Von Krogh, G. (2016). Crossroads – Identifying viable “need‑solution pairs”: Problem solving without problem formulation. Organization Science, 27(1), 207–221.

Voorberg, W. H., Bekkers, V. J. & Tummers, L. G. (2015). A systematic review of co‑creation and co‑production: Embarking on the social innovation journey. Public Management Review, 17(9), 1333–1357.

Zurbriggen, C. & Lago, M. G. (2019). An experimental evaluation tool for the Public Innovation Lab of the Uruguayan government. Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 15(3), 437–451.

Informacje

Informacje: International Journal of Contemporary Management, 2019, Numer 18 (3), s. 7 - 25

Typ artykułu: Oryginalny artykuł naukowy

Tytuły:

Polski:
Social Innovation Living Lab as a Methodology for Conceptual Design Research
Angielski:

Social Innovation Living Lab as a Methodology for Conceptual Design Research

Autorzy

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2480-8058

Grzegorz Baran
Jagiellonian University, The Faculty of Management and Social Communication, Łojasiewicza 4, Kraków 30-348, Poland
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2480-8058 Orcid
Wszystkie publikacje autora →

Jagiellonian University, The Faculty of Management and Social Communication, Łojasiewicza 4, Kraków 30-348, Poland

Publikacja: 11.2019

Status artykułu: Otwarte __T_UNLOCK

Licencja: CC BY-NC-ND  ikona licencji

Udział procentowy autorów:

Grzegorz Baran (Autor) - 100%

Korekty artykułu:

-

Języki publikacji:

Angielski