Public Management in the Polycentric Environment – A (Not) New Research Perspective
cytuj
pobierz pliki
RIS BIB ENDNOTEWybierz format
RIS BIB ENDNOTEPublic Management in the Polycentric Environment – A (Not) New Research Perspective
Data publikacji: 07.07.2016
International Journal of Contemporary Management, 2016, Numer 15(2), s. 7 - 28
https://doi.org/10.4467/24498939IJCM.16.008.5549Autorzy
Background. Subsequent research of polycentric systems was associated with the processes of metropolisation and seeking solutions to efficiently manage complex territorial structures. This approach, however, was superseded by the approach of multi-level governance. The authors propose a return to the polycentric theory, accepting it as the theoretical framework for research on functional urban areas, which are in Poland the new paradigm of co-operation of territorial units.
Research aims. The article is to draw attention to the polycentric approach as a useful framework of research in the area of public management and to verify how the organisation of functional urban areas corresponds to polycentric systems, matching relations between the participating actors and the system of distribution of power and influence.
Methodology. The article has been based on the discourse analysis as well as the analysis of the content of reports and other documents.
Key findings. Functional urban areas bear the hallmarks of polycentric systems, therefore, it seems advisable to apply the polycentric approach to their research. Moreover, the polycentrism is free from the deficiencies of MLG. In addition, the polycentric approach gives greater opportunity for interpretation and classification of inter-institutional relations.
Aligica, P.D. & Tarko, V. (2012). Polycentricity: From Polanyi to Ostrom, and beyond. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 2, 237–262.
Batten, D. F. (1995). Network cities: Creative urban agglomerations for the 21st Century. Urban Studies, 2, 313–327.
Begg, I. (1999). Cities and competitiveness. Urban Studies, 5–6, 795–810.
Bevir, M. (2009). Key Concepts in Governance. Los Angeles: Sage.
Bevir, M. (ed.) (2011). The Sage Handbook of Governance. London: Sage.
Brezzi, M. & Veneri, P. (2014). Assessing polycentric urban systems in the OECD: country, regional and metropolitan Perspectives. OECD Regional Development Working Papers, 1, 2–20.
Camagni, R. (1993). From city hierarchy to city networks: reflections about an emerging paradigm. In: T.R. Lakshmanan & P. Nijkamp (eds), Structure and Change in the Space Economy: Festschrift in Honour of Martin Beckmann. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
CEC (1999). European Spatial Development Perspective (ESDP) – Towards Balanced and Sustainable Development Of the Territory Of the EU. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
Chrabąszcz, R. (2015). Współzarządzanie a zarządzanie wielopoziomowe. In: S. Mazur (ed.), Współzarządzanie publiczne. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
Churski, P. & Hauke, J. (2012). Polycentric Development and Growth Areas. http://www.staff.amu.edu.pl/~chur/bibliografia/Churski%20Hauke.pdf (access: 30.05.2016).
Coppens, T. (2014). How to turn a planning conflict into a planning success? conditions for constructive conflict management in the case of ruggeveld-Boterlaar-Silsburg in Antwerp, Belgium. Planning Practice & Research, 1, 96–111.
ESPON (2005). Potentials For Polycentric Development in Europe. ESPON 1.1.1 Final Report. http://www.espon.eu/export/sites/default/Documents/Projects/ESPON2006Projects/ThematicProjects/Polycentricity/fr-1.1.1_revised-full.pdf (access: 30.05.2016 ).
Europa 2020 (2010). Strategia na rzecz inteligentnego i zrównoważonego rozwoju sprzyjającego włączeniu społecznemu. Bruksela. 3.3.2010 KOM(2010) 2020 wersja ostateczna.
EUROREG (2010). Ocena wpływu polityki spójności na rozwój miast polskich (w ramach ewaluacji ex post NPR 2004-2006). Badanie zostało wykonane na zlecenie Ministerstwa Rozwoju Regionalnego przez Centrum Europejskich Studiów Regionalnych i Lokalnych EUROREG Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, Warszawa.
Eurostat (1992). Definition of Urban Agglomeration in the European Community. Luxembourg. Working party of 26, 27 and 28 of February 1992 on Demographic Statistics.
Eurostat (1993). The Impact of Remote Sensing on the European Statistical System. Proceedings of the seminar Bad Neuenahr, 22 to 24 September 1992. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities: Luxembourg.
Feiock, R.C. (2013). The institutional collective action framework. The Policy Studies Journal, 3, 397–425.
George, S. (2004). Multi-level governance and the European Union. In: I. Bache & M. Flinders (eds), Multi-Level Governance. New York: Oxford University Press.
Healey, P., (1997). Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies, London, Basingstoke:Macmillan.
Homsy, G.C. & Warner, M.E. (2015). Cities and sustainability: Polycentric action and Multilevel Governance. Urban Affairs Review, 1, 46–73.
Hooghe, L. & Marks, G. (2003). Unraveling the Central State, But How? Types of Multi-Level Governance. Vienna: Institute for Advanced Studies.
James, P. (2002). International Relations and Scientific Progress: Structural Realism Reconsidered. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
Kennan, G.F. (1964). Polycentrism and Western Policy. Foreign Affairs, 2. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/china/1964-01-01/polycentrism-and-western-policy (access: 30.05.2016).
KPZK (2011). Koncepcja Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania Kraju 2030. Warszawa: Ministerstwo Rozwoju Regionalnego.
Kumar, A. & Messner, D. (eds) (2011). Power Shifts and Global Governance: Challenges from South and North. London, New York, New Delhi: Anthem Press.
Lackowska, M. (2009a). Why is Voluntary Co-operation Condemned to Failure? Reflections on the Polish and German Background. Lex Localis – Journal of Local Self-Government, 4, 347–369.
Lackowska, M. (2009b). Zarządzanie obszarami metropolitalnymi w Polsce. Między dobrowolnością a imperatywem. Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.
Lackowska, M. (2009c). Zarządzanie wielopoziomowe – nowe zastosowania koncepcji. Zarządzanie Publiczne, 3, 53–67.
Levi-Faur, D. (ed.) (2012). The Oxford Handbook of Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lindblom, C.E. (1979). Still muddling, not yet through. Public Administration Review, 6, 517–526.
Lozny, L.L. (2010). Cooperation or competition? Is collective action a viable way to build sustainable political regimes? Social Evolution & History, 2, 173–205.
Marks, G., Hooghe, L. & Blank, K. (1996). European integration from the 1980s: state-centric versus multi-level governance. Journal of Common Market Studies, 3, 341–378.
McGinnis, M. (ed.) (1999). Polycentric Governance And Development: Readings From The Workshop In Political Theory And Policy Analysis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
McGinnis, M.D. (2005). Costs and Challenges of Polycentric Governance. Paper prepared for discussion at the Workshop on Analyzing Problems of Polycentric Governance in the Growing EU. Humboldt University, Berlin June 16–17th, 2005. http://ostromworkshop.indiana.edu/papers/mcginnis_berlin.pdf (access: 30.05.2016).
McGinnis, M.D. & Ostrom, E. (2011). Reflections on Vincent Ostrom, Public administration, and polycentricity. Public Administration Review, 1, 15–25.
Meijers, E.J. (2007). Synergy in Polycentric Urban Regions. Complementarity, Organizing Capacity and Critical Mass. Delft: Delft University Press.
MIR (2014). Umowa Partnerstwa. Programowanie perspektywy finansowej 2014–2020. 23 maja 2014 r.
MRR (2013a). Zasady realizacji Zintegrowanych Inwestycji Terytorialnych w Polsce. Warszawa, lipiec 2013 r.
MRR (2013b). Kryteria delimitacji Miejskich Obszarów Funkcjonalnych Ośrodków Wojewódzkich. Warszawa, luty 2013 r.
Noworól, A. (2014). Zarządzanie rozwojem funkcjonalnych obszarów miejskich w świetle koncepcji Adaptive Governance Elinor Ostrom. In: A. Kołomycew & B. Kotarba (eds.), Partnerstwa w sferze publicznej. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
OECD (2006). Competitive Cities in the Global Economy. OECD Territorial Reviews. Paris: OECD.
Olechnicka, A. et al. (2014). Modele i narzędzia analizy terytorialnej. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
Ostrom, V., (1972). Theory of public policy, Policy Studies Journal, 2, 64–66.
Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Ostrom, V., Tiebout, C.M. & Warren, R. (1961). The organization of government in metropolitan areas: A theoretical inquiry. The American Political Science Review, 4, 831–842.
Parkinson, M. (1997). The Rise of the European entrepreneurial city. In: Financing of Cities and Regions: Subsidiarity and Finance Potentials. East-West Conference, Munich, October 1996. Conference Proceedings, 125–136.
Parkinson, M. et al. (2003). Competitive European Cities: Where Do The Core Cities Stand?. European Institute of Urban Affairs. http://www.ippnet.eu/userfiles/documents/18/076f99d6278785aecca9competitive.pdf
(access:30.05.2016).
Pawłowska, A. (2016). Governance jako podejście teoretyczne – kilka kwestii spornych [to be published in the quarterly Polityka i Społeczeństwo, 3].
Płoszaj, A. (2014). Współpraca międzysektorowa a wybrane problemy polskich miast. In: S. Borkowska S. & E. Zielińska (eds.), Układ otwarty. Miejskie partnerstwa międzysektorowe. Warszawa: Fundacja Res Publica Nowa.
Porozumienie zawarte w dniu 21 stycznia 2014 roku w sprawie określenia zasad współpracy Stron Porozumienia przy realizacji zadań przewidzianych dla Związku ZIT. Dz. Urz. Woj. 2014, poz. 666.
Pyka, R. (2014). Metropolizacja a lokalne governance. Globalne wyzwania państwa narodowego na przykładzie V Republiki Francuskiej. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.
Raczkowski, K. (2016). Public Management. Heidelberg–New York–Dordrecht–London: Springer International Publishing.
Salet, W., Thornley, A. & Kreukels, A. (eds.) (2003). Metropolitan Governance and Spatial Planning. London: Spon Press.
Skelcher, C. (2005). Jurisdictional integrity, polycentrism, and the design of democratic governance. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 1, 89–110.
Śleszyński, P. (2013). Delimitacja Miejskich Obszarów Funkcjonalnych stolic województw. Przegląd Geograficzny, 82, 175–197.
Smętkowski, M. et al. (2012). Europejskie metropolie i ich regiony: Od krajobrazu gospodarczego do sieci metropolii. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
Smith, A. (2011). Multijurisdictional regulation. In: M. Bevir (ed.), The SAGE Handbook of Governance. Los Angeles: Sage.
Tatzberger, G. (2008). A Global Economic Integration Zone In Central Europe? Wien – Bratislava – Györ as a Laboratory for EU Territorial Cohesion Policy. Wien: ÖIR.
Van Den Berg, L., Van der Meer, J., Otgaar, A. & Speller, C. (2008). Empowering Metropolitan Regions Through New Forms Of Cooperation. Hampshire: Ashgate Pub.
Waterhout, B. (2002). Polycentric development – what is behind it? In: A. Faludi (ed.), European Spatial Planning. Cambridge, Mass.: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
Wegener, M. (2013). Polycentric Europe: More Efficient, More Equitable and More Sustainable? Paper presented at the seminar “Welfare and Competitiveness in the European Polycentric Urban Structure: Which Role for Metropolitan, Medium and Small Cities?” at the Istituto Regionale Programmazione Economica della Toscana (IRPET), Florence, 7 June 2013. http://www.spiekermann-wegener.de/pub/pdf/MW_IRPET_161113.pdf (access: 30.05.2016).
Informacje: International Journal of Contemporary Management, 2016, Numer 15(2), s. 7 - 28
Typ artykułu: Oryginalny artykuł naukowy
Tytuły:
Public Management in the Polycentric Environment – A (Not) New Research Perspective
Uniwersytet Rzeszowski, Aleja Rejtana 16c 35-959 Rzeszów
Uniwersytet Rzeszowski, Aleja Rejtana 16c 35-959 Rzeszów
Publikacja: 07.07.2016
Status artykułu: Otwarte
Licencja: Żadna
Udział procentowy autorów:
Korekty artykułu:
-Języki publikacji:
AngielskiLiczba wyświetleń: 1508
Liczba pobrań: 1105