cytuj
pobierz pliki
RIS BIB ENDNOTEWybierz format
RIS BIB ENDNOTEDoes a “Better” Employee Have Gender? Women and Men Differences in OCBs and CWBs
Data publikacji: 07.07.2016
International Journal of Contemporary Management, 2016, Numer 15(2), s. 59 - 83
https://doi.org/10.4467/24498939IJCM.16.010.5551Autorzy
Background. Different types of organisational behaviours have become a very popular research topic, particularly the search for behavioural pattern of effectiveness: the degree to which objectives are achieved.
Research aims. The study explores gender differences in expression of organisational citizenship behaviours and counterproductive work behaviours, investigating chosen antecedents of the issues.
Methodology. Structural equation modelling was used to examine data based on 327 responses from 165 female and 162 male employees.
Key findings. It emerges that while citizenship is the “core” organisational behaviour for women, counterproductivity is for men, and there are different antecedents for both types of behaviour, depending on the gender. Women’s OCBs could be increased by elevation of their job satisfaction and remuneration. Men’s OCBs depends on job satisfaction that does not rely on salary. Men’s CWBs depend on citizenship performance, but women’s CWBs are not related to any factors included in our models. Considering citizenship and counterproductivity, both women and men differ rather in specific behaviours than in the dimensions of OCBs and CWBs. The results could be useful in building employees’ motivational programs.
Amos, Version 21 of the IBM SPSS Amos. [Computer software].
Archer, J. (2004). Sex differences in aggression in real-world settings: A meta-analytic review. Review of General Psychology, 8.
Bennett, R.J. & Robinson, S.L. (2000). Development of a measure of workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85.
Byrne, B. (2010). Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS. Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. NY: Routledge.
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1).
Cook, A. & Glass, Ch. (2014). Women and top leadership positions: Towards an institutional analysis. Gender, Work & Organization, 21(1).
Dalal, R.S. (2005). A meta-analysis of the relationship between organisational citizenship behavior and counterproductive work behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90.
Farrell, S.K. & Finkelstein, L.M. (2007). Organisational citizenship behavior and gender: Expectations and attributions for performance. North American Journal of Psychology, 9(1).
Fox, S., Spector, P.E., Goh, A., Bruursema, K. & Kessler, S.R. (2012). The deviant citizen: Measuring potential positive relations between counterproductive work behaviour and organisational citizenship behavior. Journal of Occupational and Organisational Psychology, 85.
Gruys, M.L. & Sackett, P.R. (2003). The dimensionality of counterproductive work behavior. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11(1).
Gunkel, M., Lusk, E.J., Wolff, B. & Li, F. (2007). Gender-specific effects at work: An empirical study of four countries. Gender, Work and Organization, 14(1).
GUS [Central Statistical Office] (2009). Concise Statistical Yearbook of Poland. Warsaw: Statistical Publishing Establishment.
GUS [Central Statistical Office] (2010). Demographic Yearbook of Poland. Warsaw: Statistical Publishing Establishment.
Jepsen, D.M. & Rodwell, J. (2012). Female perceptions of organisational justice. Gender, Work & Organization, (19)6.
Kidder, D.L. & Parks, J.M. (2001). The good soldier who is she? Journal of Organisational Behavior, 22(8).
Latham, G.P. (2007). Work motivation. History, theory, research and practice. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Leary, M.R., Nezlek, J.B., Downs, D., Radford-Davenport, J., Martin, J. & McMullen, A. (1994). Self-presentation in everyday interactions: Effects of target familiarity and gender composition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(4).
MacKenzie, S.B., Podsakoff, P.M. & Podsakoff, N.P. (2011). Challenge-oriented organisational citizenship behaviors and organisational effectiveness: Do challenge-oriented behaviors really have an impact on the organization’s bottom line? Personnel Psychology, 64(3).
Moss-Racusin, C.A., Phelan, J.E. & Rudman, L.A. (2010). When men break the gender rules: Status incongruity and backlash against modest men, Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 11(2).
O’Brien, K.E. & Allen, T.D. (2008). The relative importance of correlates of organisational citizenship behavior and counterproductive work behavior using multiple sources of data. Human Performance, 21.
Organ, D.W. (1997). Organisational citizenship behavior: It’s construct clean-up time. Human Performance, 10.
Organ, D.W. (1988). Organisational citizenship behavior: We good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Moorman, R.H. & Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers’ trust in leader, satisfaction, and organisational citizenship behaviors. Leadership Quarterly, 1.
Prentice, D.A. & Carranza, E. (2002). What women and men should be, shouldn’t be, are allowed to be, and don’t have to be: The contents of prescriptive gender stereotypes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26.
Robinson, S.L. & Bennett, R.J. (1995). A typology of deviant workplace behaviors: A multidimensional scaling study. Academy of Management Journal, 38.
Rotundo, M. & Sackett, P.R. (2002). The relative importance of task, citizenship, and counterproductive performance to global ratings of job performance: A policy-capturing approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87.
Rudman, L.A. & Glick, P. (2001). Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash Toward Agentic Women. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4).
Sackett, P.R. (2002). The structure of counterproductive work behaviors: Dimensionality and relationships with facets of job performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10.
Schnake, M.E. & Dumler, M.P. (2003). Levels of measurement and analysis issues in organisational citizenship behaviour research. Journal of Occupational and Organisational Psychology, 76.
Seppälä, T., Lipponen, J., Bardi, A. & Pirttilä-Backman, A.M. (2012). Change-oriented organisational citizenship behaviour: An interactive product of openness to change values, work unit identification, and sense of power. Journal of Occupational and Organisational Psychology, 85(1).
Spector, P.E., Bauer, J. & Fox, S. (2010). Measurement artifacts in the assessment of counterproductive work behavior and organisational citizenship behavior: Do we know what we think we know? Journal of Applied Psychology, 95.
Spector, P.E., Fox, S., Penney, L.M., Bruursema, K., Goh, A. & Kessler, S. (2006). The dimensionality of counterproductivity: Are all counterproductive behaviors created equal? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68.
Spector, P.E. (1997). Job Satisfaction: Application, Assessment, Causes, and Consequences. Thousand Oaks–London–New Delhi: Sage.
Taylor, S.E. (2006). Tend and befriend: Biobehavioral bases of affiliation under stress. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(6).
Viswesvaran, C. & Ones, D.S. (2000). Perspectives on models of job performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8.
Informacje: International Journal of Contemporary Management, 2016, Numer 15(2), s. 59 - 83
Typ artykułu: Oryginalny artykuł naukowy
Tytuły:
Does a “Better” Employee Have Gender? Women and Men Differences in OCBs and CWBs
Uniwersytet Wrocławski, Polska, plac Uniwersytecki 1, 50-137 Wrocław
Publikacja: 07.07.2016
Status artykułu: Otwarte
Licencja: Żadna
Udział procentowy autorów:
Korekty artykułu:
-Języki publikacji:
AngielskiLiczba wyświetleń: 1385
Liczba pobrań: 905