FAQ
Logo Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie

Does a “Better” Employee Have Gender? Women and Men Differences in OCBs and CWBs

Data publikacji: 07.07.2016

International Journal of Contemporary Management, 2016, Numer 15(2), s. 59 - 83

https://doi.org/10.4467/24498939IJCM.16.010.5551

Autorzy

Dorota Kanafa-Chmielewska
Uniwersytet Wrocławski, Polska, plac Uniwersytecki 1, 50-137 Wrocław
Wszystkie publikacje autora →

Tytuły

Does a “Better” Employee Have Gender? Women and Men Differences in OCBs and CWBs

Abstrakt

Background. Different types of organisational behaviours have become a very popular research topic, particularly the search for behavioural pattern of effectiveness: the degree to which objectives are achieved.

Research aims. The study explores gender differences in expression of organisational citizenship behaviours and counterproductive work behaviours, investigating chosen antecedents of the issues.

Methodology. Structural equation modelling was used to examine data based on 327 responses from 165 female and 162 male employees.

Key findings. It emerges that while citizenship is the “core” organisational behaviour for women, counterproductivity is for men, and there are different antecedents for both types of behaviour, depending on the gender. Women’s OCBs could be increased by elevation of their job satisfaction and remuneration. Men’s OCBs depends on job satisfaction that does not rely on salary. Men’s CWBs depend on citizenship performance, but women’s CWBs are not related to any factors included in our models. Considering citizenship and counterproductivity, both women and men differ rather in specific behaviours than in the dimensions of OCBs and CWBs. The results could be useful in building employees’ motivational programs.

Bibliografia

Amos, Version 21 of the IBM SPSS Amos. [Computer software].

Archer, J. (2004). Sex differences in aggression in real-world settings: A meta-analytic review. Review of General Psychology8.

Bennett, R.J. & Robinson, S.L. (2000). Development of a measure of workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology85.

Byrne, B. (2010). Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS. Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. NY: Routledge.

Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin112(1).

Cook, A. & Glass, Ch. (2014). Women and top leadership positions: Towards an institutional analysis. Gender, Work & Organization21(1).

Dalal, R.S. (2005). A meta-analysis of the relationship between organisational citizenship behavior and counterproductive work behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology90.

Farrell, S.K. & Finkelstein, L.M. (2007). Organisational citizenship behavior and gender: Expectations and attributions for performance. North American Journal of Psychology9(1).

Fox, S., Spector, P.E., Goh, A., Bruursema, K. & Kessler, S.R. (2012). The deviant citizen: Measuring potential positive relations between counterproductive work behaviour and organisational citizenship behavior. Journal of Occupational and Organisational Psychology85.

Gruys, M.L. & Sackett, P.R. (2003). The dimensionality of counterproductive work behavior. International Journal of Selection and Assessment11(1).

Gunkel, M., Lusk, E.J., Wolff, B. & Li, F. (2007). Gender-specific effects at work: An empirical study of four countries. Gender, Work and Organization14(1).

GUS [Central Statistical Office] (2009). Concise Statistical Yearbook of Poland. Warsaw: Statistical Publishing Establishment.

GUS [Central Statistical Office] (2010). Demographic Yearbook of Poland. Warsaw: Statistical Publishing Establishment.

Jepsen, D.M. & Rodwell, J. (2012). Female perceptions of organisational justice. Gender, Work & Organization(19)6.

Kidder, D.L. & Parks, J.M. (2001). The good soldier who is she? Journal of Organisational Behavior22(8).

Latham, G.P. (2007). Work motivation. History, theory, research and practice. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

LearyM.R., Nezlek, J.B., Downs, D., Radford-Davenport, J., Martin, J. & McMullen, A. (1994). Self-presentation in everyday interactions: Effects of target familiarity and gender composition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology67(4).

MacKenzie, S.B., Podsakoff, P.M. & Podsakoff, N.P. (2011). Challenge-oriented organisational citizenship behaviors and organisational effectivenessDo challenge-oriented behaviors really have an impact on the organization’s bottom line? Personnel Psychology64(3).

Moss-Racusin, C.A., Phelan, J.E. & Rudman, L.A. (2010). When men break the gender rules: Status incongruity and backlash against modest men, Psychology of Men & Masculinity11(2).

O’Brien, K.E. & Allen, T.D. (2008). The relative importance of correlates of organisational citizenship behavior and counterproductive work behavior using multiple sources of data. Human Performance21.

Organ, D.W. (1997). Organisational citizenship behavior: It’s construct clean-up time. Human Performance10.

Organ, D.W. (1988). Organisational citizenship behavior: We good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Moorman, R.H. & Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers’ trust in leader, satisfaction, and organisational citizenship behaviors. Leadership Quarterly1.

Prentice, D.A. & Carranza, E. (2002). What women and men should be, shouldn’t be, are allowed to be, and don’t have to be: The contents of prescriptive gender stereotypes. Psychology of Women Quarterly26.

Robinson, S.L. & Bennett, R.J. (1995). A typology of deviant workplace behaviors: A multidimensional scaling study. Academy of Management Journal38.

Rotundo, M. & Sackett, P.R. (2002). The relative importance of task, citizenship, and counterproductive performance to global ratings of job performance: A policy-capturing approach. Journal of Applied Psychology87.

Rudman, L.A. & Glick, P. (2001). Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash Toward Agentic Women. Journal of Social Issues57(4).

Sackett, P.R. (2002). The structure of counterproductive work behaviors: Dimensionality and relationships with facets of job performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment10.

Schnake, M.E. & Dumler, M.P. (2003). Levels of measurement and analysis issues in organisational citizenship behaviour research. Journal of Occupational and Organisational Psychology76.

Seppälä, T., Lipponen, J., Bardi, A. & Pirttilä-Backman, A.M. (2012). Change-oriented organisational citizenship behaviour: An interactive product of openness to change values, work unit identification, and sense of powerJournal of Occupational and Organisational Psychology85(1).

Spector, P.E., Bauer, J. & Fox, S. (2010). Measurement artifacts in the assessment of counterproductive work behavior and organisational citizenship behavior: Do we know what we think we know? Journal of Applied Psychology95.

Spector, P.E., Fox, S., Penney, L.M., Bruursema, K., Goh, A. & Kessler, S. (2006). The dimensionality of counterproductivity: Are all counterproductive behaviors created equal? Journal of Vocational Behavior68.

Spector, P.E. (1997). Job SatisfactionApplication, Assessment, Causes, and Consequences. Thousand Oaks–London–New Delhi: Sage.

Taylor, S.E. (2006). Tend and befriend: Biobehavioral bases of affiliation under stress. Current Directions in Psychological Science15(6).

Viswesvaran, C. & Ones, D.S. (2000). Perspectives on models of job performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment8.

Informacje

Informacje: International Journal of Contemporary Management, 2016, Numer 15(2), s. 59 - 83

Typ artykułu: Oryginalny artykuł naukowy

Tytuły:

Polski:
Does a “Better” Employee Have Gender? Women and Men Differences in OCBs and CWBs
Angielski:

Does a “Better” Employee Have Gender? Women and Men Differences in OCBs and CWBs

Autorzy

Uniwersytet Wrocławski, Polska, plac Uniwersytecki 1, 50-137 Wrocław

Publikacja: 07.07.2016

Status artykułu: Otwarte __T_UNLOCK

Licencja: Żadna

Udział procentowy autorów:

Dorota Kanafa-Chmielewska (Autor) - 100%

Korekty artykułu:

-

Języki publikacji:

Angielski