FAQ

Production engineering tools for civil engineering practice – the case of QFD

Data publikacji: 23.10.2017

Czasopismo Techniczne, 2017, Volume 10 Year 2017 (114), s. 79 - 84

https://doi.org/10.4467/2353737XCT.17.172.7280

Autorzy

,
Mirosław Dytczak
Multi-Criteria Methods Application Lab, Department of Management in Power Engineering, Faculty of Management, AGH University of Science and Technology.
Wszystkie publikacje autora →
Grzegorz Ginda
Multi-Criteria Methods Application Lab, Department of Management in Power Engineering, Faculty of Management, AGH University of Science and Technology.
Wszystkie publikacje autora →

Tytuły

Production engineering tools for civil engineering practice – the case of QFD

Abstrakt

Artykuł stanowi część cyklu prac poświęconych użyteczności narzędzi inżynierii produkcji w szeroko pojmowanym budownictwie. Uwzględniając zróżnicowany charakter wybranych narzędzi inżynierii produkcji, przedstawiono w cyklu szczegółowe obszary ich zastosowań w budownictwie. Cechy wybranych narzędzi sprawiają, że dobrze ilustrują one metodykę inżynierii produkcji. Dlatego na podstawie informacji dotyczących ich zastosowań w budownictwie, można sformułować praktyczne wnioski dotyczące przydatności metod inżynierii produkcji w budownictwie. W artykule wykorzystano w tym celu narzędzie narzędzie QFD (quality function deployment).

Bibliografia

[1] Christensen L.C., Christiansen T.R., Jin Y., Process models in enterprise engineering– tools for enhancing process description, Computing in Civil Engineering, New York 1996, 634–641.
[2] Abdul-Rahman H., Kwan C.L., Woods P.C., Quality function deployment in construction design: Application in low-cost housing design, International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 16(6)/1999, 591–605.
[3] Srividya A., Metri B.A., Improving reliability of building design using QFD approach, Indian Concrete Journal, 74(5)/2000, 249–253.
[4] Chun J., Cho J., QFD model based on a suitability assessment for the reduction of design changes in unsatisfactory quality, Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering,  14(1)/2015, 113–120.
[5] Marchi M., Mincolelli G., Design for Duchenne. Guidelines for Dwellings’ Construction or Renovation For Muscular Dystrophy-Affected Families, International Conference on Design for Inclusion, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing 500/2016, 87–96.
[6] Dikmen I., Talat Birgonul M., Kiziltas S., Strategic use of quality function deployment (QFD) in the construction industry, Building and Environment, 40(2)/2005, 245–255.
[7] Ulubeyli S., Kazaz A., Soycopur B., Er B., Quality function deployment in the speculative house-building market: How to satisfy high-income customers, International Journal of Construction Management, 15(2)/2015, 148–156.
[8] Menassa C.C., Baer B., A framework to assess the role of stakeholders in sustainable building retrofit decisions, Sustainable Cities and Society, 10/2014, 207–221.
[9] Delgado-Hernandez D.J., Bampton K.E., Aspinwall E., Quality function deployment in construction, Construction Management and Economics, 25(6)/2007, 597–609.
[10] Guo H., Yu H., Zhang B., QFD-based analysis of quality functional requirements of wooden acoustic panels, Applied Mechanics and Materials, 44–47/2011, 2661–2665.
[11] Wood L.C., Wang C., Abdul-Rahman, H., Jamal Abdul-Nasir, N.S., Green hospital design: Integrating quality function deployment and end-user demands, Journal of Cleaner Production, 112/2016, 903–913.
[12] Singhaputtangkul N., Low S.P., Teo A.L., Hwang B.-G., Knowledge-based decision support system quality function deployment (KBDSS-QFD) tool for assessment of building envelopes,
Automation in Construction, 35/2013, 314–328.
[13] Singhaputtangkul N., Zhao X., Pienaar J., Development of a knowledge-based quality function deployment tool for group decision making, Proceedings of the International Conference on Intellectual Capital, Knowledge Management and Organisational Learning, ICICKM, 2015-January, 2015, 250–258.
[14] Shao Y., Geyer P., Lang W., Integrating requirement analysis and multi-objective optimisation for office building energy retrofit strategies, Energy and Buildings, 82/2014, 356–368.
[15] Chen W.-K., Sun R., Design of intelligent building security systems based on QFD, Advanced Materials Research, 1044–1045/2014, 566–569.
[16] Eldin N., Hikle V.: Pilot study of quality function deployment in construction projects, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(3)/2003, 314–329.
[17] Kamara J.M., Anumba C.J., Evbuomwan N.F.O., Client requirements processing in construction: A new approach using QFD, Journal of Architectural Engineering, 5(1)/1999, 8–15.
[18] Hadidi L.A., Using quality function deployment to conduct assessment for engineering designs’ contractors, Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 12(3)/2016, 205–230.
[19] Jafari A., A contractor pre-qualification model based on the quality function deployment method, Construction Management and Economics, 31(7)/2013, 746–760.
[20] Goodfellow M., Wortley J., Azapagi A., A system design framework for the integration of public preferences into the design of large infrastructure projects, Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 92/2014, 687–701.
[21] Prasad K., Zavadskas E.K., Chakraborty S., A software prototype for material handling equipment selection for construction sites, Automation in Construction, 57/2015, 120–131.
[22] Gillis W.L., Cudney E.A., A methodology for applying quality function deployment to the commissioning process, EMJ – Engineering Management Journal, 27(4)/2015, 177–187.
[23] Arditi D., Lee D.-E., Assessing the corporate service quality performance of designbuild contractors using quality function deployment, Construction Management and Economics, 21(2)/2003, 175–185.
[24] Arditi D., Lee D.-E., Service quality performance of design/build contractors using quality function deployment, Construction Management and Economics, 22(2)/2004, 123–127.
[25] Lee D.-E., Arditi D., Total quality performance of design/build firms using quality function deployment, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(1)/2006, 49–57.
[26] Stojadinović Z., Marinković D., Ivković B., Sustav za mjerenje učinka ljudskih resursa za gradstrokeevinske projekte i tvrtke, Tehnicki Vjesnik, 21/2014, 69–78.
[27] Low Sui P., Yeap L., Quality function deployment in design/build projects, Journal of Architectural Engineering, 7(2)/2001,30–39.
[28] Low Sui P., Chia Chow H., Responses of architects and engineers to Quality Function Deployment (QFD) in the Singapore construction industry, Architectural Science Review, 44(3)/2001, 251–260.
[29] Nielsen Y., Erdogan B., Level of visualization support for project communication in the Turkish construction industry: A quality function deployment approach, Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 34(1)/2007, 19–36.
[30] Van Loenen B., Mroczkowski M., QFD for the building and construction industry, International Journal of Design Sciences and Technology, 17(2)/2010, 91–105.

Informacje

Informacje: Czasopismo Techniczne, 2017, Volume 10 Year 2017 (114), s. 79 - 84

Typ artykułu: Oryginalny artykuł naukowy

Tytuły:

Polski:

Production engineering tools for civil engineering practice – the case of QFD

Angielski:

Production engineering tools for civil engineering practice – the case of QFD

Autorzy

Multi-Criteria Methods Application Lab, Department of Management in Power Engineering, Faculty of Management, AGH University of Science and Technology.

Multi-Criteria Methods Application Lab, Department of Management in Power Engineering, Faculty of Management, AGH University of Science and Technology.

Publikacja: 23.10.2017

Status artykułu: Otwarte __T_UNLOCK

Licencja: Żadna

Udział procentowy autorów:

Mirosław Dytczak (Autor) - 50%
Grzegorz Ginda (Autor) - 50%

Korekty artykułu:

-

Języki publikacji:

Angielski