https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9548-4591
Tadeusz Kopyś, Ph.D. – historian at the Institute of European Studies of the Jagiellonian University. He specializes in the history of Central Europe in the 19th and 20th centuries, national issues and nationalism in this region. The main publications concern federation matters in Central Europe (Oszkár Jászi 1875–1957. From the history of the idea of federation in Central Europe, Krakow 2006, Jagiellonian University Publishing House) as well as the Hungarian Revolution of 1956 and Polish-Hungarian relations in the 20th century. He was a multiple scholarship holder at several research institutes in Hungary (e.g. Eötvös Collegium i Europái Intézet) and in Great Britain (Institute for Advanced Study in Humanities in Edinburgh). Dr. Kopysio’s studies include studies on the nationality issue (Nationality issue in the lands of Saint Stephen’s Crown in the years 1867–1918, Krakow 2001), Polish-Hungarian relations in the years 1945–1970 (Krakow 2015) and History of Hungary 1526–1989 (Krakow 2014).
Tadeusz Kopyś
Wschodnioznawstwo, Tom 17, 2023, s. 13 - 39
https://doi.org/10.4467/20827695WSC.23.002.18720
Zachowania polityki zagranicznej Turcji w danym okresie można zrozumieć analizując partię rządzącą i stosunki wewnętrzne, interesy i skład rządzącej koalicji oraz dominującą dynamikę międzynarodową. Celem artykułu jest pokazanie, że zmiany paradygmatyczne w polityce zagranicznej i motory dążenia Turcji do autonomicznej przestrzeni politycznej mogą być rozumiane jako wynik powiązanych ze sobą przemian na poziomie globalnym, regionalnym i krajowym. Po 2010 r. turecka polityka zagraniczna naznaczona była okresem „autonomizacji”, w którym rządząca partia postanowiła wypełnić geopolityczną próżnię powstałą w regionie po fiasku negocjacji z Unią Europejską w zakresie stopniowego wycofywania się Stanów Zjednoczonych z lokalnej szachownicy dyplomatycznej.
Behavioral trends in Turkish foreign policy during the rule of the Justice and Development Party
Turkey’s foreign policy behavior in a given period can be understood by examining the ruling party and domestic relations, the interests and composition of the governing coalition and prevalent international dynamics. The aim of the article is to show, that paradigmatic shifts in foreign policy and the drivers of Turkey’s quest for autonomous policy space can be understood as an outcome of interrelated transformations at global, regional and domestic levels. After 2010, Turkish foreign policy was marked by a period of „autonomization”, in which the ruling party decided to fill the geopolitical vacuum created in the region after the failure of negotiations with the European Union in the gradual withdrawal of the United States from the local diplomatic chessboard.
Tadeusz Kopyś
Studia Środkowoeuropejskie i Bałkanistyczne, Tom XXXIII, 2024, s. 55 - 78
https://doi.org/10.4467/2543733XSSB.24.004.20028Tadeusz Kopyś
Krakowskie Studia z Historii Państwa i Prawa, Tom 15, Zeszyt 3, Tom 15 (2022), s. 369 - 388
https://doi.org/10.4467/20844131KS.22.025.16173In Hungarian history, the Crown of St. Stephen was an important relic symbolizing the unity of the Hungarian state. It was not merely a coronation jewel or symbol of royal prerogatives, but a respected element of the country’s historic “millennial”constitution. Although the doctrine associated with it was a unique Hungarian constitutional theory, symbolizing national independence, it was flexible enough to serve various political ideas and ambitions. The Crown has always embodied the monarchical form of the Hungarian State, and its sacred character symbolized the strong alliance of the monarchy with the Catholic Church. Is this historical doctrine compatible with the values and requirements of modern Europe and the requirements of present-day Hungarian constitutionalism?