Nihil durat in aeternum. On the Ecosystem of Political Communication in the Process of Dynamic Changes, Main Trends and Resulting Threats
cytuj
pobierz pliki
RIS BIB ENDNOTEChoose format
RIS BIB ENDNOTENihil durat in aeternum. On the Ecosystem of Political Communication in the Process of Dynamic Changes, Main Trends and Resulting Threats
Publication date: 27.06.2023
Media Research Issues, 2023, Volume 66, Issue 2 (254), pp. 11 - 24
https://doi.org/10.4467/22996362PZ.23.013.17977Authors
Nihil durat in aeternum. On the Ecosystem of Political Communication in the Process of Dynamic Changes, Main Trends and Resulting Threats
Nihil durat in aeternum. Rzecz o ekosystemie komunikowania politycznego w procesie dynamicznych przemian, głównych trendach i wynikających zagrożeniach
Obserwatorzy i badacze procesów komunikowania politycznego nie mają wątpliwości, że obszar ich zainteresowań ulega głębokim, wielowymiarowym przeobrażeniom. Liczne prace powstające w ostatnich latach stawiają sobie za cel prezentację i analizę charakterystyki zachodzących zmian. Na ogół odnoszą się one do mediów, aktorów politycznych lub obywateli. Zdecydowanie rzadziej pojawiają się próby wielowymiarowej diagnozy zmian, jakie dokonują się we wszystkich głównych elementach ekosystemu komunikowania politycznego. Celem artykułu jest identyfikacja trendów współczesnego komunikowania politycznego. Istotę samego trendu stanowi sekwencja zmian układających się w pewną prawidłowość, wykazujących siłę i ciągłość w czasie, istniejący w danym momencie kierunek rozwoju. Artykuł proponuje zarówno identyfikację, jak i analizę trendów, co rozumieć należy jako interpretację rzeczywistości wymagającą interdyscyplinarnego i otwartego heurystycznego podejścia. Dzięki jego zastosowaniu możliwe staje się szersze spojrzenie na procesy i zmiany zachodzące w ekosystemie komunikowania politycznego, pozwalające na prowadzenie dalszych analiz oraz formułowanie hipotez dotyczących konsekwencji i możliwych kierunków zachodzących zmian, w szczególności odnoszących się do zaufania do mediów i polityków.
Nihil durat in aeternum. On the Ecosystem of Political Communication in the Process of Dynamic Changes, Main Trends and Resulting Threats
Political communication observers and researchers recognise that the field is undergoing deep and multidimensional transformations. Numerous recent works presented and analysed the characteristics of the changes taking place and refer to the media, political actors or citizens. However, attempts at a multidimensional analysis of changes in the political communication ecosystem are much less frequent. This article aims to identify trends in contemporary political communication. A trend is a sequence of changes forming a certain regularity, showing strength and continuity over time, and the direction of development existing at a given moment. The research in this article identifies and analyses these trends, which should be understood as an interpretation of reality requiring an interdisciplinary and open heuristic approach. This approach will provide a broader view of the processes and changes taking place in the political communication ecosystem, allowing for further analyses and the formulation of hypotheses about the consequences and possible directions of the changes taking place, particularly those relating to trust in the media and politicians.
Bennett W.L., Entman R.M. (2001). Mediated Politics: An Introduction. In: W.L. Bennett, R.M. Entman (eds.). Mediated Politics: Communication in the Future of Democracy (pp. 1–29). New York.
Blumler J.G. (2016). The Fourth Age of Political Communication. Politiques de Communication, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 19–30.
Blumler J.G., Gurevitch M. (1995). The Crisis of Public Communication. London–New York.
Brzoza-Kolorz K., Głuszek-Szafraniec D., Szostok-Nowacka P. (2019). „Cóż tam, panie, w polityce?”, czyli o wzajemnym postrzeganiu dziennikarzy i polityków w mediach. Katowice.
Chadwick A., Dennis J., Smith A.P. (2019). Politics in the Age of Hybrid Media: Power, Systems, and Media Logics. In: A. Bruns et al. (eds.). The Routledge Companion to Social Media and Politics (pp. 7–22). New York.
Couldry N. (2012). Media, Society, World: Social Theory and Digital Media Practice. Cambridge–Malden.
Cushion S. (2015). News and Politics: The Rise of Live and Interpretive Journalism. London–New York.
Davis A. (2019). Political Communication: A New Introduction for Crisis Times. Cambridge–Medford.
Davis A. et al. (2020). Media, Democracy and Social Change: Re-imagining Political Communications. London–Thousand Oaks–New Delhi–Singapore.
de Beus J. (2011). Audience Democracy: An Emerging Pattern in Postmodern Political Communication. In: K. Brants, K. Voltmer (eds.). Political Communication in Postmodern Democracy: Challenging the Primacy of Politics (pp. 19–38). Basingstoke.
de Sio L. (2018). The Geometry of Party Competition: Parties and Voters in the Issue Space. In: J. Fisher et al. (eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Elections, Voting Behavior and Public Opinion (pp. 394–403). London–New York.
de Vreese C.H. et al. (2018). Populism as an Expression of Political Communication Content and Style: A New Perspective. International Journal of Press/Politics, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 423–438.
Delli Carpini M.X. (2004). Mediating Democratic Engagement: The Impact of Communications on Citizens’ Involvement in Political and Civic Life. In: L.L. Kaid (ed.). Handbook of Political Communication Research (pp. 395–434). New York.
Dobek-Ostrowska B. (2007). Komunikowanie polityczne i publiczne. Podręcznik akademicki. Warszawa.
Dommett K., Kefford G., Power S. (2021). The Digital Ecosystem: The New Politics of Party Organization in Parliamentary Democracies. Party Politics, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 847–857.
Dumdum O.O., Bankston L. (2022). The Interplay of Actors in Political Communication: The State of the Subfield. Political Communication, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 266–279.
Durántez-Stolle P., Martínez-Sanz R. (2019). Politainment in the Transmedia Construction of the Image of Politicians. Communication & Society, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 111–126.
Esser F. (1999). ‘Tabloidization’ of News: A Comparative Analysis of Anglo-American and German Press Journalism. European Journal of Communication, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 291–324.
Esser F. et al. (2017). The Explanatory Logic: Factors that Shape Political News. In: C.H. de Vreese, F. Esser, D.N. Hopmann (eds.). Comparing Political Journalism (pp. 22–31). London.
Esser F., Pfetsch B. (2020). Political Communication. In: D. Caramani (ed.). Comparative Politics (pp. 327–346). Oxford.
Fortunato J.A. (2015). Commercialization: Impact on Media Content. In: W. Donsbach (ed.). The Concise Encyclopedia of Communication (pp. 68–69). Malden–Oxford–Chichester.
Gandy O.H., Jr. (2001). Dividing Practices: Segmentation and Targeting in the Emerging Public Sphere. In: W.L. Bennett, R.M. Entman (eds.). Mediated Politics: Communication in the Future of Democracy (pp. 141–159). New York.
Garlicki J. (2010). Komunikowanie polityczne – od kampanii wyborczej do kampanii permanentnej. Studia Politologiczne, no. 16, pp. 26–45.
Godlewski T. (2008). Obywatelskie kompetencje polityczne. In: D. Karnowska (red.). Demokracja w Polsce po 2005 roku (pp. 99–106). Toruń.
Gurevitch M., Coleman S., Blumler J.G. (2009). Political Communication – Old and New Media Relationships. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, vol. 625, no. 1, pp. 164–181.
Hallin D.C., Mancini P. (2004). Americanization, Globalization, and Secularization: Understanding the Convergence of Media Systems and Political Communication. In: F. Esser, B. Pfetsch (eds.). Comparing Political Communication: Theories, Cases, and Challenges (pp. 25–44). Cambridge.
Houston B. (2008). Interpretive Journalism. In: W. Donsbach (ed.). The International Encyclopedia of Communication (pp. 2501–2503). Malden–Oxford–Carlton.
Hutchens M.J. et al. (2016). A Spiral of Skepticism? The Relationship between Citizens’ Involvement with Campaign Information to Their Skepticism and Political Knowledge. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, vol. 93, no. 4, pp. 1073–1090.
Idzik J., Klepka R. (2019). Voters in The Filter Bubble: Local Government Election Campaign in Polish Opinion Weeklies in the Light of the “Echo Chamber” Concept. International Relations Review, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 119–130.
Joathan Í., Lilleker D.G. (2023). Permanent Campaigning: A Meta-Analysis and Framework for Measurement. Journal of Political Marketing, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 67–85.
Klepka R. (2017). Hard czy soft: specyfika newsów w „Wiadomościach” TVP w czasie prezydenckiej kampanii wyborczej w 2015 roku. Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis. Studia de Securitate et Educatione Civili, no. 7, pp. 245–257.
Klepka R. (2018). Medialna walka o dobrą zmianę. Obraz wyborów parlamentarnych w 2015 roku w wybranych mediach. Kraków.
Klepka R. (2020). Medialna hipertrofia jako kluczowy problem bezpieczeństwa medialnego. In: H. Batorowska, P. Motylińska (red.). Bezpieczeństwo informacyjne i medialne w czasach nadprodukcji informacji (pp. 99–121). Warszawa.
Komunikat z badań CBOS 43/2020 (2020). Zaufanie społeczne. Komunikat z badań CBOS 37/2022 (2022) Zaufanie społeczne.
Mattoni A., Ceccobelli D. (2018). Comparing Hybrid Media Systems in the Digital Age: A Theoretical Framework for Analysis. European Journal of Communication, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 540–557.
Mazur M. (2014). Polityka z twarzą: personalizacja parlamentarnych kampanii wyborczych w Polsce w latach 1993–2011. Katowice.
McNair B. (2012). Journalism and Democracy: An Evaluation of the Political Public Sphere. London–New York.
Mielczarek T. (2007). Monopol, pluralizm, koncentracja. Środki komunikowania masowego w Polsce w latach 1989–2006. Warszawa.
Negrine R., Lilleker D.G. (2002). The Professionalization of Political Communication: Continuities and Change in Media Practices. European Journal of Communication, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 305–323.
Negrine R., Papathanassopoulos S. (2011). The Transformation of Political Communication. In: S. Papathanassopoulos (ed.). Media Perspectives for the 21st Century (pp. 41–54). London–New York.
Norris P. (2001). Political Communications and Democratic Politics. In: J. Bartle, D. Griffiths (eds.). Political Communications Transformed: From Morrison to Mandelson (pp. 163–180). Basingstoke–New York.
Pacewicz G. (2018). Konotacja i denotacja „trendu”. In: A. Kucner et al. Trendy. Interpretacje i konfrontacje (pp. 138–148). Olsztyn.
Papathanassopoulos S. et al. (2007). Political Communication in the Era of Professionalisation. In: R. Negrine et al. (eds.). The Professionalisation of Political Communication (pp. 63–80). Bristol–Chicago.
Papathanassopoulos S., Negrine R. (2019). Political Communication, Digital Inequality and Populism. In: J. Trappel (ed.). Digital Media Inequalities: Policies against Divides, Distrust and Discrimination (pp. 79–94). Göteborg.
Perloff R.M. (2017). The Dynamics of Political Communication: Media and Politics in a Digital Age. London–New York.
Schulz W. (2014). Political Communication in Long-Term Perspective. In: C. Reinemann (ed.). Political Communication (pp. 63–85). Berlin–Boston.
Snower D.J., Bosworth S.J. (2021). Economic, Social and Political Fragmentation: Linking Knowledge-Biased Growth, Identity, Populism and Protectionism. European Journal of Political Economy, vol. 67, pp. 2–22.
Song H., Gil de Zúñiga H., Boomgaarden H.G. (2020). Social Media News Use and Political Cynicism: Differential Pathways through “News Finds Me” Perception. Mass Communication and Society, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 47–70.
Sparks C. (2000). Introduction: The Panic over Tabloid News. In: C. Sparks, J. Tulloch (eds.). Tabloid Tales: Global Debates over Media Standards (pp. 1–40). Lanham–Boulder–New York–Oxford.
Sternicka-Kowalska M. (2018). Trend w perspektywie badań socjologicznych. In: A. Kucner, et al. Trendy. Interpretacje i konfrontacje (pp. 11–35). Olsztyn.
Swanson D.L. (2004). Transnational Trends in Political Communication: Conventional Views and New Realities. In: F. Esser, B. Pfetsch (eds.). Comparing Political Communication: Theories, Cases, and Challenges (pp. 45–63). Cambridge.
Thussu D.K. (2007). News as Entertainment: The Rise of Global Infotainment. London–Thousand Oaks–New Delhi–Singapore.
Van Aelst P. et al. (2017). Political Communication in a High-Choice Media Environment: A Challenge for Democracy? Annals of the International Communication Association, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 3–27.
van Deth J.W. (2018). Voting and the Expanding Repertoire of Participation. In: J. Fisher et al. (eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Elections, Voting Behavior and Public Opinion (pp. 96–107). London–New York.
Walecka-Rynduch A. (2019). MediaEgo w MediaPolis. W stronę nowego paradygmatu komunikowania politycznego. Kraków.
Zarouali B., Helberger N., Vreese de C.H. (2021). Investigating Algorithmic Misconceptions in a Media Context: Source of a New Digital Divide? Media and Communication, vol. 9, no. 4, ppe. 134–144.
Information: Media Research Issues, 2023, Volume 66, Issue 2 (254), pp. 11 - 24
Article type: Original article
Titles:
Nihil durat in aeternum. On the Ecosystem of Political Communication in the Process of Dynamic Changes, Main Trends and Resulting Threats
Nihil durat in aeternum. On the Ecosystem of Political Communication in the Process of Dynamic Changes, Main Trends and Resulting Threats
Institute of Security Education and Civic Education, University of the National Education Commission, Krakow
Poland
Published at: 27.06.2023
Article status: Open
Licence: CC BY
Percentage share of authors:
Article corrections:
-Publication languages:
EnglishView count: 420
Number of downloads: 283
Suggested citations: Harvard