Agenda-Setting and Reverse Agenda-Setting in the New Media Environment. Theoretical Approach and Research Results (2013–2017)
cytuj
pobierz pliki
RIS BIB ENDNOTEChoose format
RIS BIB ENDNOTEAgenda-setting i reverse agenda-setting w środowisku nowych mediów. Podstawy teoretyczne i wyniki badań empirycznych (2013–2017)
Publication date: 20.12.2019
Media Research Issues, 2019, Volume 62, Issue 4 (240), pp. 95 - 112
https://doi.org/10.4467/22996362PZ.19.046.11050Authors
Agenda-setting i reverse agenda-setting w środowisku nowych mediów. Podstawy teoretyczne i wyniki badań empirycznych (2013–2017)
Agenda-Setting and Reverse Agenda-Setting in the New Media Environment. Theoretical Approach and Research Results (2013–2017)
The development of new media environment requires adequate verification of the results of previously known media effects research. Agenda-setting theory is one of these classic approaches that should be discussed using new types of (public and media) agendas in order to determine their dependencies. Thus the goal of this article is to verify the basic assump-tion of agenda-setting theory and its modification, that is the reverse agenda-setting concept in an online media environment. The results of empirical data showed that the agenda-set-ting theory is still a relevant approach when observing the dependencies between the public agenda and media agenda, which means that media agenda (measured by the frequency of publications of online opinion forming dailies devoted to the selected issues) is statistically significantly dependent on public agenda (measured by public opinion surveys concerning the same issues). The reverse agenda-setting dependency has been observed for the new type of public agenda, that is search agenda (measured using Google Trends application), which proved to be statistically significantly dependent on online news media (opinion forming dailies) agenda.
Babbie E. (2007). Badania społeczne w praktyce, tłum. W. Betkiewicz. Warszawa.
CBOS (2018). Korzystanie z Internetu. Komunikat z badań nr 62/2018. [https://www.cbos.pl/PL/szukaj/szukaj.php; 11.11.2018].
Chadwick A. (2013). A Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power. Oxford.
Chaffee S.H., Metzger M.J. (2001). The End of Mass Communication?, Mass Communication & Society, vol. 4(4), p. 365–379.
Dearing J.W., Rogers E.M. (1996). Agenda-Setting. Communication Concepts 6. Thousand Oaks – London – New Delhi.
Debatin B. (2008). The Internet as a News Platform for Expressing Opinions and as a New Public Sphere. W: W. Donsbach, M.W. Traugott (ed.). The Sage Handbook of Public Opinion Research (p. 64–72). Los Angeles.
Dick M. (2011). Search Engine Optimization in UK News Production. Journalism Practice, vol. 5, p. 462–477.
Dobrołowicz M. (2016). Czy to już rynek pracownika? Poziom bezrobocia w Polsce, Rynek Pracy, nr 1, s. 72–74.
EB Standard (Autumn 2013). [http://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/index.cfm/Survey/index#p=1&instruments=STANDARD; 12.11.2018].
EB Standard (Autumn 2014). [http://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/index.cfm/Survey/index#p=1&instruments=STANDARD; 12.11.2018].
EB Standard (Autumn 2015). [http://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/index.cfm/Survey/index#p=1&instruments=STANDARD; 12.11.2018].
EB Standard (Autumn 2016). [http://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/index.cfm/Survey/index#p=1&instruments=STANDARD; 12.11.2018].
EB Standard (Autumn 2017). [http://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/index.cfm/Survey/index#p=1&instruments=STANDARD; 12.11.2018].
EB Standard (Spring 2013). [http://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/index.cfm/Survey/index#p=1&instruments=STANDARD; 12.11.2018].
EB Standard (Spring 2014). [http://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/index.cfm/Survey/index#p=1&instruments=STANDARD; 12.11.2018].
EB Standard (Spring 2015). [http://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/index.cfm/Survey/index#p=1&instruments=STANDARD; 12.11.2018].
EB Standard (Spring 2016). [http://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/index.cfm/Survey/index#p=1&instruments=STANDARD; 12.11.2018].
EB Standard (Spring 2017). [http://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/index.cfm/Survey/index#p=1&instruments=STANDARD; 12.11.2018].
Euronews (2018). [https://www.euronews.com/about; 01.12.2018].
Eurostat (2013). EU Member States granted protection to 135 700 Asylum Seekers in 2013. [https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/2995521/5173390/3–19062014-BP-EN.PDF/5adae441–47f4–4669-b9a3-a44b29c64e24; 11.11.2018].
Eurostat (2014). Asylum Quarterly Report. [https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/6049358/7005580/Asylum+quarterly+report+-+Q4+2015.pdf/7c7307b1-a816–439b-a7d9–2d15e6e22e82; 11.11.2018].
Eurostat (2017). Asylum Statistics. [https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Asylum_statistics#Number_of_asylum_applicants:_drop_in_2017; 11.11.2018].
Francuz P., Mackiewicz R. (2007). Liczby nie wiedzą, skąd pochodzą. Przewodnik po metodologii i statystyce. Nie tylko dla psychologów. Lublin.
Frączyk J. (2017). Koniec bezrobocia w Polsce. Nie pracuje ten, kto nie chce, podaje BIEC. [money.pl. https://www.money.pl/gospodarka/wiadomosci/artykul/biec-naturalna-stopa-bezrobocia-wrp-wskaznik,193,0,2360769.html; 11.11.2018].
Funkhouser G.R. (1973). The Issues of the Sixties: An Exploratory Study in the Dynamics of Public Opinion. Public Opinion Quarterly, vol. 37(1), p. 62–75.
Funkhouser G.R., Shaw E.F. (1990). How Synthetic Experience Shapes Social Reality. Journal of Communication, vol. 40, p. 75–87.
Google Trends (2018). [https://trends.google.pl/trends/?geo=PL; 21.10.2018].
GUS (2018). Stopa bezrobocia rejestrowanego w latach 1990–2018. [https://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/rynek-pracy/bezrobocie-rejestrowane/stopa-bezrobocia-rejestrowanego-w-latach-1990–2018,4,1.html; 11.11.2018].
IMM. (2014). Najbardziej opiniotwórcze polskie media w 2013 roku, Instytut Monitorowania mediów, Warszawa luty 2014. [https://www.imm.com.pl/sites/default/files/raporty/raport_najbardziej_opiniotworcze_media_2013.pdf; 21.10.2018].
IMM. (2015). Najbardziej opiniotwórcze polskie media w 2014 roku, Instytut Monitorowania mediów, Warszawa luty 2015. [https://www.imm.com.pl/sites/default/files/raporty/najbardziej_opiniotworcze_media_w_2014.pdf; 21.10.2018].
IMM. (2016). Najbardziej opiniotwórcze polskie media w 2015 roku, Instytut Monitorowania mediów, Warszawa marzec 2016. [https://www.imm.com.pl/sites/default/files/raporty/najbardziej_opiniotworcze_media_w_2015.pdf 21.10.2018; 21.10.2018].
IMM. (2017). Najbardziej opiniotwórcze polskie media w 2016 roku, Instytut Monitorowania mediów, Warszawa luty 2017. [https://www.imm.com.pl/sites/default/files/raporty/najbardziej_opiniotworcze_media_w_2016_0.pdf; 21.10.2018].
IMM. (2018). Najbardziej opiniotwórcze polskie media w 2017 roku, Instytut Monitorowania mediów, Warszawa styczeń 2018. [https://www.imm.com.pl/sites/default/files/raporty/najbardziej_opiniotworcze_media_w_2017.pdf; 21.10.2018].
Lee A.M., Lewis S.C., Powers M. (2014). Audience Clicks and News Placement. A Study of Time-Lagged Influence in Online Journalism. Communication Research, vol. 41(4), p. 505–530.
López-Escobar E., Sádaba T. (2017). Agenda-Setting: Second Level Perspective and Cognitive versus Persuasive Effects. W: P. Rossler (ed.). The International Encyclopedia of Media Effects (p. 38–45). Chichester.
McCombs M.E., Shaw D., Weaver D. (2014), New Directions in Agenda-Setting Theory and Research, Mass Communication and Society, vol. 17, p. 781–802.
McCombs M. (2008). Ustanawianie agendy. Media masowe i opinia publiczna, tłum. B. Radwan. Kraków.
McCombs M., Shaw D. (1972). The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass Media, Public Opinion Quarterly, vol. 36(2), p. 176‒187.
Ragas M., Tran H., Martin J. (2014). Media-Induced or Search-Driven? A Study of Online
Sayre B., Bode L., Shah D., Wilcox D., Shah C. (2010). Agenda Setting in a Digital Age:
Tracking Attention to California Proposition 8 in Social Media, Online News, and Conventional News. Policy & Internet, vol. 2, p. 7–32.
Scharkow M., Vogelgesang J. (2011). Measuring the Public Agenda Using Search Engine Queries. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, vol. 23(1), p. 104–113.
Search Engine Market Share Poland (2013–2017). [http://gs.statcounter.com/search-engine-market-share/all/poland/2013; 11.11.2018].
Shafi A. (2016). Personal Experience Versus Media Coverage: Testing the Issue Obtrusiveness Condition of Agenda-Setting Theory in a Developing Country. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, vol. 94(4), p. 1056–1072.
Shaw D.L., Weaver D.H. (2014). Epilogue. Media Agenda-Setting and Audience Agenda-Melding. W: M. McCombs (ed.). Setting the Agenda. The Mass Media and Public Opinion. Second Edition (Kindle edition). Cambridge.
Soroka S.N. (2002). Agenda-Setting Dynamics in Canada. Vancouver.
Szukalski P. (2018). Niskie bezrobocie – zagrożenie dla sektora usług społecznych. Rynek Pracy, nr 3, s. 16–24.
Tandoc E.C. (2014). Journalism is Twerking? How Web Analytics is Changing the Process of Gatekeeping. New Media & Society, vol. 16(4), p. 559–575.
Urząd do spraw Cudzoziemców (2015). Dane liczbowe dotyczące postępowań prowadzonych wobec cudzoziemców w latach 2013–2015. [https://udsc.gov.pl/statystyki/raporty-okresowe/zestawienia-roczne/; 05.12.2018].
Urząd do spraw Cudzoziemców (2017). Miesięczny raport z działalności Urzędu (2015, 2016, 2017), Urząd do spraw Cudzoziemców. [https://udsc.gov.pl/statystyki/raporty-okresowe/meldunek-miesieczny/2015–2/; 05.12.2018].
Vu H.T., Guo L., McCombs M.E. (2014). Exploring ‘the World Outside and the Pictures in our Heads’: A Network Agenda-Setting Study. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, vol. 91 (4), p. 669–686.
Weiman G., Brosius H.B. (2016). New Agenda for Agenda-Setting Research in the Digital Era. W: G. Vowe, P. Henn (ed.). Political Communication in the Online World: Theoretical Approaches and Research Design (p. 26–44). New York – London.
Weimann G., Brosius H.B. (2017). Redirecting the Agenda. Agenda-Setting in the Online Era. Agenda Setting Journal, vol. 1(1), p. 63–101.
Wu H.D., Coleman R. (2009). Advancing Agenda-Setting Theory: The Comparative Strength and New Contingent Conditions of the Two Levels of Agenda-Setting Effects. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, vol. 86(4), p. 775–789.
Zucker H.G. (1978). The Variable Nature of News Media Influence. Communication Yearbook, vol. 2, p. 225–245.
Information: Media Research Issues, 2019, Volume 62, Issue 4 (240), pp. 95 - 112
Article type: Original article
Titles:
Agenda-setting i reverse agenda-setting w środowisku nowych mediów. Podstawy teoretyczne i wyniki badań empirycznych (2013–2017)
Agenda-Setting and Reverse Agenda-Setting in the New Media Environment. Theoretical Approach and Research Results (2013–2017)
Maria Curie Skłodowska University, Plac Marii Skłodowskiej-Curie 5, Lublin, Poland
Published at: 20.12.2019
Article status: Open
Licence: CC BY-NC-ND
Percentage share of authors:
Article corrections:
-Publication languages:
PolishView count: 1889
Number of downloads: 1177