FAQ
logo of Jagiellonian University in Krakow

What Might it Mean to Democratize School Reform?

Publication date: 2009

Public Management, Szyszkownik 2024, Issue 4 (4) , pp. 13 - 19

Authors

John Fischer
Bowling Green State University, Ohio, USA
All publications →

Titles

What Might it Mean to Democratize School Reform?

Abstract

he goal of education is to prepare individuals for the new world of global connections, competition and the labor market by means of an educational process that works to get students ready for activity, responsibility and deliberation. Within these issues schools and teachers are the focus of much concern. Many reform efforts work to remove autonomy from the school. “Deskilling,” viewing school improvement through the lens of packaged programs that work to script teachers, prescribe what they should do in their context, and pull more and more control to central authorities, is not a new phenomenon. Recently, however, teachers have been recognized as necessary leaders in school reform.
How might those based in universities proceed to work and change the situation we find in schools? Rather than one-shot, one-way school reform efforts and programs which are known to have little impact compared to long-term, collegial work, our work with schools should be based on building professional relationships. Democratic school reform is possible. By working (as it was mentioned) to link schools, universities and communities in engaged, reciprocal, networks of support we can strengthen the outcomes and the success of school reform in ways that lift up students, teachers, communities, universities and democratic societies themselves.

References

Ayers W., Teaching toward freedom, Beacon Press, Boston 2004.

Ayers W., Klonsky, M., and Lyon, G., A simple justice: the challenge of small schools, Teachers College Press, New York and London 2000.

Clark C., Moss P., Goering S., Herter R., Lamar B., Leonard D., Robbins S., Russell M., Templin M. and Wascha K., Collaboration as dialogue: Teachers and researchers engaged in conversation and professional development, American Educational Research Journal 33(1), 1996.

Darling-Hammond L. and Sykes G. (eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco 1999.

Fine M., Not in our name: Reclaiming the democratic vision of small school reform, Rethinking Schools, 4(19), 2005.

Giroux H.A., Teoria krytyczna i racjonalność w edukacji obywatelskiej, in: T. Jaworska, R. Leppert (eds.), Wprowadzenie do pedagogiki, Oficyna Wydawnicza IMPULS, Kraków 1998.

Goddard R.D., Hoy W.K. and Hoy A.W., Collective Efficacy Beliefs: Theoretical developments, empirical evidence, and future directions, Educational Researcher, Vol. 33, no. 3, April 2004.

Hamer L., Fischer J. and Stewart V., Teachers’ experiences of longitudinal school reform: A phenomenological study with implications for reform efforts, unpublished, 2007.

Hixson J., and Tinzmann M.B., What changes are generating new needs for professional development?, retrieved March 26, 2002, from http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/rpl_esys/profdev..htm

Kaczara A., O kryzysie szkoły raz jeszcze, in: J. Kargul (ed.), Z aktualnych problemów oświaty i kultury, Prace Pedagogiczne, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego, 1997.

Kahne J. and Westheimer J., A pedagogy of collective action and reflection: Preparing teachers for collective school leadership, Journal of Teacher Education, 51(5), 2000.

Pomson Alex D.M., One classroom at a time? Teacher isolation and community viewed through the prism of the particular, retrieved through http://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentID+11820 on June 4, 2007.

Sparks D. and Hirsch S., A new vision for staff development, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Alexandria 1997.

Spring J., Conflict of interest: The politics of American education, 4th ed., McGraw-Hill, New York 2002.

Stigler J.W. and Hiebert J., The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom, NY: Summit Books, New York 1999.

Stronge J.H., Qualities of effective teachers, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Alexandria 2002.

Wiburg K. and Brown S., Lesson Study Communities Increasing Achievement with Diverse Students, CA: Corwin Press, Thousand Oaks 2007.

Wood F.H. and Thompson S.R., Assumptions about staff development based on research and best practice, Journal of Staff Development 14(4), 1993, pp. 52–57

Information

Information: Public Management, Szyszkownik 2024, Issue 4 (4) , pp. 13 - 19

Article type: Original article

Titles:

Polish:

What Might it Mean to Democratize School Reform?

English:

What Might it Mean to Democratize School Reform?

Authors

Bowling Green State University, Ohio, USA

Published at: 2009

Article status: Open

Licence: CC BY  licence icon

Percentage share of authors:

John Fischer (Author) - 100%

Article corrections:

-

Publication languages:

English

View count: 796

Number of downloads: 679