How do you write about female authors?
cytuj
pobierz pliki
RIS BIB ENDNOTEChoose format
RIS BIB ENDNOTEJak pisać o pisarkach? Podsumowania
Publication date: 25.05.2017
Terminus, 2016, Volume 18, Issue 2 (39), pp. 117 - 130
https://doi.org/10.4467/20843844TE.16.004.6814Authors
Jak pisać o pisarkach? Podsumowania
At the moment, the majority of papers concerning women’s writing oscillates between cultural studies and literary studies, or history studies and literary studies. Such a view on women’s creative output and, in more general terms, women’s presence in culture, seems to bring the best results. Due to academic development in recent decades and the so-called “return of the subject” in philosophical, social, historical and literary studies, these disciplines gained a perspective that turns to womanly experiences, and interprets them with specific methodologies, thereby rendering them valid objects of study and representative voices of a given epoch.
In studies on early modern women’s literature, we should create a space for dialogue between philological studies, social history, the history of culture and gender studies. Only such an attitude makes it possible to avoid misunderstandings inscribed in the studies on early modern culture carried out with the application of modern and post-modern analytical categories, including the category of gender. At the same time, we should bear in mind that gender always remains a category that is useful in historico-literary analyses, if it keeps its critical relation to binary categories “woman”/“man” and “femininity”/“masculinity”, as well as to its own function consisting of forming social dynamics based on the sexual difference. Thus understood dialogical perspective allows going beyond the programmatic and methodological frames of feminist studies, in which a “woman” and a “man” are presented as permanent and closed categories that can only be used to describe various social roles, but do not lead to any critical interpretation of these roles.
Amorós C., Prólogo, w: Asunción Oliva Portolés, La pregunta por el sujeto en la teoría feminista. El debate filosófico actual, Madrid 2009, s. 11–20.
Collin F., Différence et différend, la question des femmes en philosophie, w: Histoire des femmes en Occident, t. 5, red. G. Duby, M. Perrot, Paris 1992, s. 243–374.
Collin F., Praxis de la diferencia. Liberación y libertad, Barcelona 2006.
Davis N.Z., Gender and Genre: Women as Historical Writers, 1400–1820, “University of Ottawa Quarterly” 50 (1980), nr 1, s. 123–144.
Davis N.Z., Women and the World of Annales, „History Workshop Journal” 33 (1992), s. 121–137.
Díaz-Diocartez M., „La palabra no olvida de donde vino”. Para una poética dialógica de la diferencia, w: Breve historia feminista de la literatura Española (en lengua castellana), t. 1,Teoría feminista: Discursos y diferencias. Enfoques feministas de la literatura española, Barcelona 1993, s. 77–124.
García González G., La experiencia de la mujer hecha memoria, w: Espacios visibles. Espacios invisibles. Mujer y Memoria en la Salamanca del Siglo XVI (selección documental), ed. G. García González, M.L. Prado Herrera, Salamanca 2006, s. 19–35.
Gilbert S., Gubar S., No Man’s Land: Sex Changes, New Haven 1991.
Gilbert S., Gubar S., The Madwoman in the Attic: The Woman Writer and the Nineteenth-Century Literary Imagination, New Haven 1979.
Gordon A.D., Buhle M.J., Dye N.Sh., The Problem of Women’s History, w: Liberating Women’s History. Theoretical and Critical Essays, ed. B. Caroll, Chicago 1976, s. 75–93.
Iwasiów I., Wstęp, w: Prywatne/publiczne. Gatunki pisarstwa kobiecego, red. I. Iwasiów, Szczecin 2008, s. 7–11.
Jehlen M., Archimedes and the Paradox of Feminist Criticism, „Signs” 6 (1981), s. 575–561.
Kramarae Ch., Coming to Terms with Women’s Language, w: International Encyclopedia of Communications, ed. E. Barnouw, t. 1–2, New York 1989, s. 157–60.
Lewandowska J., Sor Juana Inés de la Cruz y la crítica literaria feminista: contribuciones y controversias, „Itinerarios. Revista de estudios lingüísticos, literarios, históricos y antropológicos” 15 (2012), s. 43–66.
Nash M., Historia, retos y movimientos, Barcelona 2004.
Partyka J., Żona wyćwiczona. Kobieta pisząca w kulturze XVI i XVII wieku, Warszawa 2004.
Penelope J., Unlearning the Lies of the Fathers’ Tongues, New York 1990.
Rivera Garretas M. M., Nombrar el mundo en femenino: Unos ejemplos del Humanismo y Renacimiento, w: La conjura del olvido. Escritura y Feminismo, ed. N. Ibeas, M. Ángeles Millán, Barcelona 1997, s. 89–106.
Scott J.W., Gender as a Useful Category of Historical Analysis, „American Historical Review” 91 (1986), 5, s. 1053–1075.
Scott J.W., Gender: Still a Useful Category of Analysis?, „Diogenes” 57 (2010), s. 7–14.
Showalter E., Krytyka feministyczna na bezdrożach. Pluralizm a krytyka feministyczna, „Teksty Drugie”, nr 4/5/6 (22/23/24) 1993, s. 115–146.
Spender D., Man Language, London 1984.
Zavala I.M., Las formas y funciones de una teoría crítica feminista. Feminismo dialógico, w: Breve historia feminista de la literatura española (en lengua castellana), t. 1, Teoría feminista: discursos y diferencia, ed. I.M. Zavala, M.Díaz-Diocartez, Barcelona 1993, s. 27–76.
Zavala I.M., El canon, la literatura y las teorías feministas, w: Breve historia feminista de la literatura española (en lengua castellana), t. 1, Teoría feminista: discursos y diferencia, ed. I.M. Zavala, M. Díaz-Diocartez, Barcelona 1993, s. 9–20.
Information: Terminus, 2016, Volume 18, Issue 2 (39), pp. 117 - 130
Article type: Original article
Titles:
Jak pisać o pisarkach? Podsumowania
How do you write about female authors?
The Institute of Literary Research at Polish Academy of Sciences, Nowy Świat 72, Warsaw, Poland
The Institute of Literary Research at Polish Academy of Sciences, Nowy Świat 72, Warsaw, Poland
University of Warsaw, Krakowskie Przedmieście 30, 00-927 Warszawa, Poland
Published at: 25.05.2017
Article status: Open
Licence: None
Percentage share of authors:
Article corrections:
-Publication languages:
Polish