FAQ
logo of Jagiellonian University in Krakow

Complexity of the Inversion Algorithm of Polynomial Mappings

Publication date: 24.03.2017

Schedae Informaticae, 2016, Volume 25, pp. 209 - 225

https://doi.org/10.4467/20838476SI.16.016.6197

Authors

Paweł Bogdan
Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland
All publications →

Titles

Complexity of the Inversion Algorithm of Polynomial Mappings

Abstract

In this paper we will recall the inversion algorithm described in [1]. The algorithm classifies polynomial automorphisms into two sets: Pascal finite and Pascal infinite. In this article the  complexity of the inversion algorithm will be estimated. To do so, we will present two popular ways  how Computer   lgebra Systems (CASes) keep the information about multivariate polynomials. We will define the complexity as the amount of simple operations performed by the algorithm as a function of the size of the input. We will define simple operations of the algorithm. Then we will estimate complexity of checking that the polynomial map is not a polynomial automorphism. To do so we will use theorem 3.1 from [1].

References

[1] Adamu E., Bogdan P., Crespo T., Hajto Z., An effective study of polynomial maps. Journal of Algebra and Its Applications, 2017, 16(5).

[2] Campbell L.A., A condition for a polynomial map to be invertible. Mathematische Annalen, 1973, 205(3), pp. 243–248.

[3] Crespo T., Hajto Z., Picard-vVessiot theory and the Jacobian problem. Israel Journal of Mathematics, 2012, 186(1), pp. 401–406.

[4] Adamus E., Bogdan P., Hajto Z., An effective approach to Picard-Vessiot theory and the Jacobian Conjecture, 2015, submitted.

[5] M¨uller N.T., Uniform Computational Complexity of Taylor Series. In: 14th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming, London, UK, UK, Springer-Verlag, 1987, pp. 435–444.

[6] Bardet M., Faug`ere J.C., Salvy B., On the complexity of the F5 Gr´’obner basis algorithm. Journal of Symbolic Computation, 2014, 70, pp. 1–24.

[7] Faug`ere J.C., Safey El Din M., Spaenlehauer P.J., Gr¨obner Bases of Bihomogeneous Ideals Generated by Polynomials of Bidegree (1,1): Algorithms and Complexity. Journal of Symbolic Computation, 2011, 46(4), pp. 406–437 Available online 4 November 2010.

[8] Adamus E., Bogdan P., Crespo T., Hajto Z., An effective study of polynomial maps, 2016, submitted.

[9] Developers T.S., Sage Mathematics Software (Version 7.1). 2015.

[10] Winkler F., Polynomial Algorithms in Computer Algebra. Texts & Monographs in Symbolic Computation. Springer Vienna, 1996.

[11] van den Essen A., Polynomial Automorphisms: and the Jacobian Conjecture (Progress in Mathematics). Birkhuser, 2000.

[12] Yagzhev A.V., Keller’s problem. Siberian Mathematical Journal, 1980, 21(5), pp. 747–754.

[13] Bass H., Connell E.H., Wright D., The Jacobian conjecture: Reduction of degree and formal expansion of the inverse. Bulletin of the AMS – American Mathematical Society (NS), 1982, 7(2), pp. 287–330.

[14] Druzkowski L.M., An Effective Approach to Keller’s Jacobian Conjecture. Mathematische Annalen, 1983, 264, pp. 303–314.

Information

Information: Schedae Informaticae, 2016, Volume 25, pp. 209 - 225

Article type: Original article

Titles:

Polish:
Complexity of the Inversion Algorithm of Polynomial Mappings
English:
Complexity of the Inversion Algorithm of Polynomial Mappings

Authors

Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland

Published at: 24.03.2017

Article status: Open

Licence: None

Percentage share of authors:

Paweł Bogdan (Author) - 100%

Article corrections:

-

Publication languages:

English